Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Browns overall grade "OUTSTANDING"

Browns overall grade "OUTSTANDING"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
14 Posts 12 Posters 1.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Dan in Florida Dan in FloridaD
    • 437 Posts
    • 0 Reputation
    Dan in FloridaD Dan in Florida wrote on last edited by Dan in Florida
    #1

    Originally posted:

    by (Dan in Florida @ Apr 27 2009, 07:28 PM) in the thread "The Draft Grades Are In"...why there?

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NFL DRAFT

    Draft grades

    Browns, Eagles receive highest marks

    By Nolan Nawrocki [Pro Football Weekly]

    April 27, 2009

    In a typical draft, the goal of NFL teams is to come away with starters in the first three rounds. In a weak draft such as this one, the draft expectation diminishes, with teams hoping to find sub-package or niche role players who can contribute their first year in Round Three.

    It’s not fair to evaluate a draft class before it is given time to show how it produces, but there is an art to knowing the value of talent, moving up and down the draft board to secure targets and acquire additional picks — and the following grades are based more on the ability of teams to recognize value and manipulate the draft board to their favor than they are an evaluation of the talent acquired, which has not yet had a chance to prove its worth.

    For our analysis of the draft, we will use an abbreviated scouting scale with four terms — outstanding, good, average and questionable — to evaluate draft classes. Grades were assigned based on the number of starters we believe each team can be expected to have acquired, with two starters and a nickel contributor being the expectation by which we judged each team. Those teams we think were able to meet that expectation did a good job. Anyone producing better did an outstanding job. Future picks that were acquired for the first three rounds of subsequent drafts will be counted as potential starters, and veterans acquired also need to be factored into the equation. Because of the premium placed on the QB position, the acquisition of a Pro Bowl quarterback is being considered equivalent to two starters.

    To be fair, the best work of scouting departments is often done after the draft in what used to be Rounds 8-12, where many teams often produce starters. Not all undrafted free agents have even finished signing deals, making these grades very incomplete. For example, the Chargers' 2003 draft was discouraging, with the first three picks — Sammy Davis, Drayton Florence and Terrence Kiel, all drafted in the first 62 picks, turning out to be disappointments. But when taking into account an undrafted free-agent class that included not only three starters, but three Pro Bowlers — TE Antonio Gates, OG Kris Dielman and special-teams superstar Kassim Osgood — not to mention Pro Bowl P Mike Scifres in the fifth round, A.J. Smith’s 2003 draft may rank among the best ever.

    The risk of picks, considering medical and character questions, was also considered and weighed into grades, as was the drafting of projections who may have a steeper learning curve and include more overall risk to make it in the NFL. Also considered is the overall number of players expected to make the 53-man roster, although that was given less weight given that it is easier to make a roster of a bad team than it is a team that has been well-stocked. Lastly, the ability to match talent to schemes and coaching staffs was also weighed.

    Based on our analysis, the winners in each division this year were the Cleveland Browns in the AFC and the Philadelphia Eagles in the NFC.

    AFC

    Cleveland Browns — No team may have orchestrated trades and acquired more overall value better than the Browns, who traded back three times in the first round before landing their prize, Alex Mack, in front of a team (Vikings) that was considering selecting the draft’s first center. Brian Robiskie and Mohamed Massaquoi both have starter potential at receiver and could allow for a Braylon Edwards trade. David Veikune is a projected outside linebacker who has a great motor and fits the scheme. Kaluka Maiava could fill a nickel linebacker role. CBs Don Carey and Coye Francies could make the roster. DE Kenyon Coleman and DB Abram Elam, acquired from the Jets for the fifth pick, along with QB Brett Ratliff, could both be starters. Overall, the Browns may come away with six starters from this draft, while also adding character to the locker room and potentially replacing a fifth of the 53-man roster through the draft. GM George Kokinis and head coach Eric Mangini have received a fair share of criticism in their short tenure together, but they may have had the best draft of any AFC team.

    Grade: Outstanding

    Pro Football Weekly link

    I'm sticking with Mangini & Amber
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • NewEraDawg NewEraDawgN
      • 645 Posts
      • 0 Reputation
      NewEraDawgN NewEraDawg wrote on last edited by
      #2

      AFC

      Cleveland Browns — No team may have orchestrated trades and acquired more overall value better than the Browns, who traded back three times in the first round before landing their prize, Alex Mack, in front of a team (Vikings) that was considering selecting the draft’s first center. Brian Robiskie and Mohamed Massaquoi both have starter potential at receiver and could allow for a Braylon Edwards trade. David Veikune is a projected outside linebacker who has a great motor and fits the scheme. Kaluka Maiava could fill a nickel linebacker role. CBs Don Carey and Coye Francies could make the roster. DE Kenyon Coleman and DB Abram Elam, acquired from the Jets for the fifth pick, along with QB Brett Ratliff, could both be starters. Overall, the Browns may come away with six starters from this draft, while also adding character to the locker room and potentially replacing a fifth of the 53-man roster through the draft. GM George Kokinis and head coach Eric Mangini have received a fair share of criticism in their short tenure together, but they may have had the best draft of any AFC team.

      Grade: Outstanding

      My thoughts exactly . ❗

      NewEraDawg
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
        • 64k Posts
        • 8k Reputation
        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Mack could have been nabbed by the Vikings... OR

        also the Ravens or Steelers or even Altanta I think it was.

        If the ratbirds or steelers had nabbed a perennial All-pro at center,

        we'd all be sick. It's dramatic improvement at center for the Browns,

        and addition by subtraction.. the Browns adding Mack and keeping him from the

        ratbirds and steelers - that is priceless.

        vs the big NT's of the rats and stinklers - the Browns' Mack will be worth his weight in gold.

        The second wr was certainly a surprise, what with other players on the board most of us have talked about,

        but when you read up on him and the rest of the picks, it's brilliant and consistent picking of character, fine intelligence

        and football smarts, and skill.

        Pretty shrewd. And, they couldn't trade down anymore... the ratbirds were only a few picks away.

        I love it.

        Oldcrow1945O 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • C calfoxwc

          Mack could have been nabbed by the Vikings... OR

          also the Ravens or Steelers or even Altanta I think it was.

          If the ratbirds or steelers had nabbed a perennial All-pro at center,

          we'd all be sick. It's dramatic improvement at center for the Browns,

          and addition by subtraction.. the Browns adding Mack and keeping him from the

          ratbirds and steelers - that is priceless.

          vs the big NT's of the rats and stinklers - the Browns' Mack will be worth his weight in gold.

          The second wr was certainly a surprise, what with other players on the board most of us have talked about,

          but when you read up on him and the rest of the picks, it's brilliant and consistent picking of character, fine intelligence

          and football smarts, and skill.

          Pretty shrewd. And, they couldn't trade down anymore... the ratbirds were only a few picks away.

          I love it.

          Oldcrow1945 Oldcrow1945O
          • 1k Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          Oldcrow1945O Oldcrow1945 wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @calfoxwc said:

          Mack could have been nabbed by the Vikings... OR

          also the Ravens or Steelers or even Altanta I think it was.

          I think Atlanta was the team that would've been all over Mack. LSU's McClure is old and Romberg is a career back up.

          Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote! - "Ben Franklin"
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • We need Tom Tupa W
            • 591 Posts
            • 11 Reputation
            W We need Tom Tupa wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I really love where this thread is going. Informative, useful, and pretty. Keep up the good work!

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • choco chocoC
              • 4k Posts
              • 352 Reputation
              chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
              #6

              hooray for grudge posting!!!!

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Dan in Florida Dan in FloridaD
                • 437 Posts
                • 0 Reputation
                Dan in FloridaD Dan in Florida wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @shepwrite said:

                Funny, Toop.

                I find it SO disappointing and repetitive and disappointing and redundant.

                I should start my own thread about this...lol

                I'm sticking with Mangini & Amber
                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Gips GipsG
                  • 3k Posts
                  • 34 Reputation
                  GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by Gips
                  #8

                  C'mon shep..

                  Its a good article its worth duping...plus dans headline is more attractive...hehehehehehe 😉

                  We have been rebuilding since 1964, Why stop now? GO BROWNS!
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • OconRecon OconReconO Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 1k Posts
                    • 2 Reputation
                    OconReconO OconRecon wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    T T T - I'm diggin' this outstanding grade.

                    Let's bump the shit out of this thread until pre-season.........

                    or at least until Friday when rookie mini-camp starts.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • daddybull1 D
                      • 384 Posts
                      • 19 Reputation
                      D daddybull1 wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Living here in Pennsylvania, I can say without a doubt, the Steelers definitly had their eyes on Mack...

                      He was #1 on their draft board.... You should have heard the grumblings when we picked him..

                      Hey, maybe this is a trend, we've beat them in the draft so lets do it on the field....

                      T.Dawg

                      Dan in FloridaD nickersN 2 Replies Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • D daddybull1

                        Living here in Pennsylvania, I can say without a doubt, the Steelers definitly had their eyes on Mack...

                        He was #1 on their draft board.... You should have heard the grumblings when we picked him..

                        Hey, maybe this is a trend, we've beat them in the draft so lets do it on the field....

                        T.Dawg

                        Dan in Florida Dan in FloridaD
                        • 437 Posts
                        • 0 Reputation
                        Dan in FloridaD Dan in Florida wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @daddybull1 said:

                        Living here in Pennsylvania, I can say without a doubt, the Steelers definitly had their eyes on Mack...

                        He was #1 on their draft board.... You should have heard the grumblings when we picked him..

                        Hey, maybe this is a trend, we've beat them in the draft so lets do it on the field....

                        T.Dawg

                        I heard that too about the stinkin' Squeelers wanting Mack. I like having a guy called "Mack" plowing up the middle for some reason.

                        I'm sticking with Mangini & Amber
                        ? 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • D daddybull1

                          Living here in Pennsylvania, I can say without a doubt, the Steelers definitly had their eyes on Mack...

                          He was #1 on their draft board.... You should have heard the grumblings when we picked him..

                          Hey, maybe this is a trend, we've beat them in the draft so lets do it on the field....

                          T.Dawg

                          nickers nickersN Conversation Starter Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                          • 14k Posts
                          • 5k Reputation
                          nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by nickers
                          #12

                          @daddybull1 said:

                          Living here in Pennsylvania, I can say without a doubt, the Steelers definitly had their eyes on Mack...

                          He was #1 on their draft board.... You should have heard the grumblings when we picked him..

                          Hey, maybe this is a trend, we've beat them in the draft so lets do it on the field....

                          T.Dawg

                          Daddybull...Great to see You posting again...I had wondered what happened to Ya and hoped you were ok......And I agree...We need to start kickin some Stooler ass around here...Its about damn time!

                          Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 9k Posts
                            • 2k Reputation
                            ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Mack Truck

                            If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • Dan in FloridaD Dan in Florida

                              @daddybull1 said:

                              Living here in Pennsylvania, I can say without a doubt, the Steelers definitly had their eyes on Mack...

                              He was #1 on their draft board.... You should have heard the grumblings when we picked him..

                              Hey, maybe this is a trend, we've beat them in the draft so lets do it on the field....

                              T.Dawg

                              I heard that too about the stinkin' Squeelers wanting Mack. I like having a guy called "Mack" plowing up the middle for some reason.

                              mz. ?
                              • Posts
                              • 0 Reputation
                              ? mz. wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @dan-in-florida said:

                              I like having a guy called "Mack" plowing up the middle for some reason.

                              Perv.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply

                              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                              Register Login
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              Theme
                              • System
                              • Light
                              • Dark
                              The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                              The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Forums
                              • Recent
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Donate