Skip to content

Camp Trubisky

The Browns Board
548 53 13.4k
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    I didn't get to see this game. I would still take him.

  • I didn't get to see this game. I would still take him.

    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    I didn't get to see this game. I would still take him.

    Why? Because he's a homie?

    Zombo

  • Z Zombo wrote on last edited by

    OK, that last drive was mucho impressive. Love his arm. I'll keep an open mind. But he feels like a project, not a first year starter.

    Zombo

  • Z Zombo wrote on last edited by

    #90 for Stanford though ... he's ready for primetime.

    Zombo

  • @the-gipper said:

    I didn't get to see this game. I would still take him.

    Why? Because he's a homie?

    Zombo

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    Zombo said:

    Why? Because he's a homie?

    Zombo

    I have explained this. Because he is better than anyone that has come out in two years....and perhaps anyone that will come out in the next couple of years.

    And because you said it: the Browns need to quit fucking around and get a real QB. And this guy can be a real QB. Is he perfect? No....But then, since like 1970 there have been maybe10-12 better prospects that have come out better than him.

    Bradshaw, Elway, Bernie, Vinny, Peyton, Aikman, Newton, Luck, Winston

    He is a better prospect than the likes of Jeff George, Vick, Plunket, Stafford, Palmer, Smith, Couch, Bartkowski and a number of others.

  • OK, that last drive was mucho impressive. Love his arm. I'll keep an open mind. But he feels like a project, not a first year starter.

    Zombo

    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by

    Zombo said:

    OK, that last drive was mucho impressive. Love his arm. I'll keep an open mind. But he feels like a project, not a first year starter.

    Zombo

    The plan is to have him sit on the bench and learn from The Wiley Old Pro RG3.

    WSS

    🙁

  • T Taco918 wrote on last edited by

    Well he did a solid job on this final drive of the 4th. Got lucky on those first two completions (both probably should've been reviewed) but that's more on the WR's then Mitch. He got dicked over by his WR with an awful drop for a TD but he came back and made a great play to get the TD.

    Didn't have a shot in hell on the 2 pointer though.

    Overall it was a bit of a mixed bag. He made some mistakes, had to deal with a fluky fumble but came through in the clutch when his team needed it.

  • #90 for Stanford though ... he's ready for primetime.

    Zombo

    T Taco918 wrote on last edited by

    Zombo said:

    #90 for Stanford though ... he's ready for primetime.

    Zombo

    Yes he is. If he hasn't declared yet, he should after that game.

  • Zombo said:

    Why? Because he's a homie?

    Zombo

    I have explained this. Because he is better than anyone that has come out in two years....and perhaps anyone that will come out in the next couple of years.

    And because you said it: the Browns need to quit fucking around and get a real QB. And this guy can be a real QB. Is he perfect? No....But then, since like 1970 there have been maybe10-12 better prospects that have come out better than him.

    Bradshaw, Elway, Bernie, Vinny, Peyton, Aikman, Newton, Luck, Winston

    He is a better prospect than the likes of Jeff George, Vick, Plunket, Stafford, Palmer, Smith, Couch, Bartkowski and a number of others.

    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    I have explained this. Because he is better than anyone that has come out in two years....and perhaps anyone that will come out in the next couple of years.

    And because you said it: the Browns need to quit fucking around and get a real QB. And this guy can be a real QB. Is he perfect? No....But then, since like 1970 there have been maybe10-12 better prospects that have come out better than him.

    Bradshaw, Elway, Bernie, Vinny, Peyton, Aikman, Newton, Luck, Winston

    He is a better prospect than the likes of Jeff George, Vick, Plunket, Stafford, Palmer, Smith, Couch, Bartkowski and a number of others.

    He seems very raw with a rocket arm to me, but I will keep an open mind.

    Zombo

  • @the-gipper said:

    I have explained this. Because he is better than anyone that has come out in two years....and perhaps anyone that will come out in the next couple of years.

    And because you said it: the Browns need to quit fucking around and get a real QB. And this guy can be a real QB. Is he perfect? No....But then, since like 1970 there have been maybe10-12 better prospects that have come out better than him.

    Bradshaw, Elway, Bernie, Vinny, Peyton, Aikman, Newton, Luck, Winston

    He is a better prospect than the likes of Jeff George, Vick, Plunket, Stafford, Palmer, Smith, Couch, Bartkowski and a number of others.

    He seems very raw with a rocket arm to me, but I will keep an open mind.

    Zombo

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    Zombo said:

    He seems very raw with a rocket arm to me, but I will keep an open mind.

    Zombo

    Yea, not saying he is ready immediately to step in and win games. Give him half a year to sit and learn. Its not like the Browns will likely be ready to win big at the beginning of next year. And, Like with the Browns, he does not have that good of a team around him. In games I saw this year the NC defense was pretty suckass.

  • alporciniA alporcini wrote on last edited by

    Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

  • #90 for Stanford though ... he's ready for primetime.

    Zombo

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73

    Zombo said:

    #90 for Stanford though ... he's ready for primetime.

    Zombo

    DE Soloman Thomas..Dudes got guns..7 tackles, 1 GW Sack but nobody wanted to block him either..Tia, if u get time. U the man on D tape Monsters..Edit--As for Mitch, I thought he played well behind a Bad OL that got beat up just as bad against a good Virginia Tech D Front..Tuff. yes raw, but got that AFCN look moving in pocket with eyes down field

  • B beare wrote on last edited by

    Garnett and trubinsky both had blah bowl games with that said id love to see trubinsky drop to 2nd rd grab him there. The biggest prob i see if we draft a qb who is gonna mentor him rg3 that would never work.

  • flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on last edited by

    If we pass, then he will be with the Jets

  • Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @alporcini said:

    Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

  • Garnett and trubinsky both had blah bowl games with that said id love to see trubinsky drop to 2nd rd grab him there. The biggest prob i see if we draft a qb who is gonna mentor him rg3 that would never work.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @beare said:

    Garnett and trubinsky both had blah bowl games with that said id love to see trubinsky drop to 2nd rd grab him there. The biggest prob i see if we draft a qb who is gonna mentor him rg3 that would never work.

    He may not drop past #2 if we don't take him.

    What the fuck is wrong with you people saying stupid shit like "I hope/think he would drop to round 2". He isn't fucking dropping to past the Top 1,2,3.

  • If we pass, then he will be with the Jets

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    If we pass, then he will be with the Jets

    Or the 49ers or the Bears.

    Hello people. Wake up!! He is better than the guys that went #1 and #2 overall last year.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
  • @alporcini said:

    Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    sure changed your tune from last draft, where you were screaming NOT to draft a QB high(just because he's the highest rated QB in the draft) and to, instead, draft the highest rated player(your guy was Bosa).....you said it over and over and over...

    But, this year...we should draft a QB first, JUST because he's the highest QB(even though he's not the highest rated player)?

    contradiction abounds

  • T Taco918 wrote on last edited by

    I think Gipper might have a crush.