browns chargers game 2017
-
Hopefully the move demoralizes the players and we can pull bosa out of there in time to play with nick when we draft him?
-
Did texas really need a 3rd team tho?
Did texas really need a 3rd team tho?
Florida has 3. NY sorta has 3. Calif has 4...for now.
Texas can probably support 3 teams better than LA can support one.
-
SD isn''t that far from LA... so the die hard's still have a team.
As for me attending our trip to LA... not in the cards for 2017.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
SD isn''t that far from LA... so the die hard's still have a team.
As for me attending our trip to LA... not in the cards for 2017.
SD isn''t that far from LA... so the die hard's still have a team.
If the Browns moved to Columbus today to play in a soccer stadium while they had a football stadium built and changed their logo before you woke up this morning to reflect Columbus ... you'd have thousands of people dumping their now useless Cleveland Browns gear in front of the offices in Berea and and half the board saying "I'm Out!"
Zombo
-
SD isn''t that far from LA... so the die hard's still have a team.
If the Browns moved to Columbus today to play in a soccer stadium while they had a football stadium built and changed their logo before you woke up this morning to reflect Columbus ... you'd have thousands of people dumping their now useless Cleveland Browns gear in front of the offices in Berea and and half the board saying "I'm Out!"
Zombo
Zombo said:
If the Browns moved to Columbus today to play in a soccer stadium while they had a football stadium built and changed their logo before you woke up this morning to reflect Columbus ... you'd have thousands of people dumping their now useless Cleveland Browns gear in front of the offices in Berea and and half the board saying "I'm Out!"
Zombo
The Chargers have changed the logo too? Did not see that. Why would they do that ? (other, obviously than to change SD ot LA)
There was nothing wrong with their logo that it needed changing....unless they want back to the original like 1960 LA Chargers logo.
-
This is it? Its really pretty suck ass, ain't it:
-
Better, though I think this is an old one:
-
SD isn''t that far from LA... so the die hard's still have a team.
As for me attending our trip to LA... not in the cards for 2017.
SD isn''t that far from LA... so the die hard's still have a team.
As for me attending our trip to LA... not in the cards for 2017.
You hosting us if we all decide to do Houston?
-
Is this their new helmet design?
Basically same as the old, which is fine.
-
You hosting us if we all decide to do Houston?
Hosting is a bit strong, but I know some places...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
SD isn''t that far from LA... so the die hard's still have a team.
If the Browns moved to Columbus today to play in a soccer stadium while they had a football stadium built and changed their logo before you woke up this morning to reflect Columbus ... you'd have thousands of people dumping their now useless Cleveland Browns gear in front of the offices in Berea and and half the board saying "I'm Out!"
Zombo
Zombo said:
If the Browns moved to Columbus today to play in a soccer stadium while they had a football stadium built and changed their logo before you woke up this morning to reflect Columbus ... you'd have thousands of people dumping their now useless Cleveland Browns gear in front of the offices in Berea and and half the board saying "I'm Out!"
Zombo
Exactly.
-
You hosting us if we all decide to do Houston?
Hosting is a bit strong, but I know some places...
-
SD isn''t that far from LA... so the die hard's still have a team.
As for me attending our trip to LA... not in the cards for 2017.
SD isn''t that far from LA... so the die hard's still have a team.
As for me attending our trip to LA... not in the cards for 2017.
The diehards are telling the team to go fuck themselves and dumping boxes full of Chargers gear in front of the team offices.
-
Again....I guess I am wondering about that: How is going to LA going to make the NFL....and its other owners make all that much more profit? How is having a team in a city that is almost completely non-supportive an economic boon?
Nationally I do not see where the Chargers will be any more attractive in LA than they were in SD.
I mean, is it JUST stadium loge money?
And with the Rams there that honey pot would have to be seriously divided.
Will having half sold loges and half filled seats be all that remunerative.
I guess the financial benefit of this move has to be explained to me, as I don't really see it.
Though, there is one thing that I think will happen: The Chargers stadium will be half or more filled with the fans of the visiting teams.
When the Browns play there next year, I expect the place to be overwhelmed by Browns fans. Same with when the Broncos/Chiefs/Steelers/Patriots etc. etc. etc. go there. The place will be taken over.
Fair to say?
I read somewhere, might have been on profootballtalk.com, that this LA stadium thing is similar to Jerry Jones' place, but on a larger scale (hard to believe).
The NFL will gain by having FOX Sports headquarters there, hosting Super Bowls, NCAA events, maybe the draft, and so on.
I think the ticket money we fans generate is just frosting on the cake for these guys. The TV revenue seems more important, that's why these owners want the Thursday games, even though it's generally a lousy product.
I read somewhere, might have been on profootballtalk.com, that this LA stadium thing is similar to Jerry Jones' place, but on a larger scale (hard to believe).
The NFL will gain by having FOX Sports headquarters there, hosting Super Bowls, NCAA events, maybe the draft, and so on.
I think the ticket money we fans generate is just frosting on the cake for these guys. The TV revenue seems more important, that's why these owners want the Thursday games, even though it's generally a lousy product.
This might be a BIG financial mistake with the NFL showing cracks in the shield, viewership is actually dropping particularly on the Thursday and even less interest in Sunday Night and Monday Night games.
And now drop a $1B plus investment in Lala Land? Is that wise? Not really unless it becomes part of Disneyland.
Plus moving two old franchises to a weak LA market plus the Raiders to an untried Vegas market....well maybe they can comp you with football tickets if you blow enough gambling.
-
I read somewhere, might have been on profootballtalk.com, that this LA stadium thing is similar to Jerry Jones' place, but on a larger scale (hard to believe).
The NFL will gain by having FOX Sports headquarters there, hosting Super Bowls, NCAA events, maybe the draft, and so on.
I think the ticket money we fans generate is just frosting on the cake for these guys. The TV revenue seems more important, that's why these owners want the Thursday games, even though it's generally a lousy product.
This might be a BIG financial mistake with the NFL showing cracks in the shield, viewership is actually dropping particularly on the Thursday and even less interest in Sunday Night and Monday Night games.
And now drop a $1B plus investment in Lala Land? Is that wise? Not really unless it becomes part of Disneyland.
Plus moving two old franchises to a weak LA market plus the Raiders to an untried Vegas market....well maybe they can comp you with football tickets if you blow enough gambling.
This might be a BIG financial mistake with the NFL showing cracks in the shield, viewership is actually dropping particularly on the Thursday and even less interest in Sunday Night and Monday Night games.
And now drop a $1B plus investment in Lala Land? Is that wise? Not really unless it becomes part of Disneyland.
Plus moving two old franchises to a weak LA market plus the Raiders to an untried Vegas market....well maybe they can comp you with football tickets if you blow enough gambling.
From my understanding, Stan Kronke (or however you spell it) paid for the new stadium in LA himself. The league might have chipped in some money in exchange for having the NFL combine and all league offices be a part of this new giant palace in Inglewood.
The Raiders will do fine in Vegas....big following, cheap flights from LA, OC or Bay area and it seems clear that Raiders fans don't care where the team plays and they'll still follow them. SD Chargers fans are not going to follow this team to LA even though its' only about 90 miles away. People in SD hate everything about LA and there's no chance they're going to support the team up there.
-
This might be a BIG financial mistake with the NFL showing cracks in the shield, viewership is actually dropping particularly on the Thursday and even less interest in Sunday Night and Monday Night games.
And now drop a $1B plus investment in Lala Land? Is that wise? Not really unless it becomes part of Disneyland.
Plus moving two old franchises to a weak LA market plus the Raiders to an untried Vegas market....well maybe they can comp you with football tickets if you blow enough gambling.
From my understanding, Stan Kronke (or however you spell it) paid for the new stadium in LA himself. The league might have chipped in some money in exchange for having the NFL combine and all league offices be a part of this new giant palace in Inglewood.
The Raiders will do fine in Vegas....big following, cheap flights from LA, OC or Bay area and it seems clear that Raiders fans don't care where the team plays and they'll still follow them. SD Chargers fans are not going to follow this team to LA even though its' only about 90 miles away. People in SD hate everything about LA and there's no chance they're going to support the team up there.
From my understanding, Stan Kronke (or however you spell it) paid for the new stadium in LA himself. The league might have chipped in some money in exchange for having the NFL combine and all league offices be a part of this new giant palace in Inglewood.
The Raiders will do fine in Vegas....big following, cheap flights from LA, OC or Bay area and it seems clear that Raiders fans don't care where the team plays and they'll still follow them. SD Chargers fans are not going to follow this team to LA even though its' only about 90 miles away. People in SD hate everything about LA and there's no chance they're going to support the team up there.
I know you've been following this Mark. The SD folks had to know by now how the new stadium or I'll move extortion game is played. They had their chance- and vote, adios.
-
Heard some sports talk show discuss the move and the situation so mimics the browns.
Chargers in Sand Diego for 56 yrs.
Spanos asking for a new stadium as far back as 1995 when the Chargers were in the Super Bowl vs San Fran.
Padres after 1 winning season get a new baseball stadium, but the chargers continue to be ignored.
Spanos...he had no choice.
-
Heard some sports talk show discuss the move and the situation so mimics the browns.
Chargers in Sand Diego for 56 yrs.
Spanos asking for a new stadium as far back as 1995 when the Chargers were in the Super Bowl vs San Fran.
Padres after 1 winning season get a new baseball stadium, but the chargers continue to be ignored.
Spanos...he had no choice.
Heard some sports talk show discuss the move and the situation so mimics the browns.
Chargers in Sand Diego for 56 yrs.
Spanos asking for a new stadium as far back as 1995 when the Chargers were in the Super Bowl vs San Fran.
Padres after 1 winning season get a new baseball stadium, but the chargers continue to be ignored.
Spanos...he had no choice.
Spanos had no choice if he wanted to keep up with the (Jerry) Jonses.
We wouldn't expect a Steelers fan to know the details of 1995, but regarding Artie- not exactly. He had the original sweetheart deal from the City of Cleveland- essentially free stadium, all the concessions, and the rather primitive luxury box revenue. And he had the Indians as a captive tenant. Hit Model right in the pocket when the Tribe moved to Jacobs Field. But though he had to be jealous, Artie never asked for a NEW Stadium, The plans for a remodeled one were on the books, and there was a vote on the November ballot. That's where Spanos and Modell diverge. Spanos has been bellyaching for a new stadium for decades, Voters rejected funding a couple months ago. Modell never asked for one- and if he had- it would have been a done deal. There's a difference in wealth too. Alex is worth over a billion- Modell had no choice BECAUSE it came to light after the fact- he was essentially broke. Even with the $42 million bribe from Baltimore, the state of Maryland- and a sweetheart deal that made anything he had in Cleveland look like chump change, he was forced to sell out to Biscotti- because Fleet Bank was threatening foreclosure on him. Plus, Modell could have sold out to Al Lerner, but nope, he wanted to pass the team down to his cigar chompin' kid. As Mr. DeFord famously said- "Sorry Art, you're just not RICH enough to own a football team anymore."
-
FWIW the Chargers get to move into Kroenke's 2.6 billion dollar palace for $1 a year. Not sure for how long the sweetheart deal lasts but the NFL forced the deal on Kroenke as a condition for approving his move from St Louis. Remember, the NFL didn't support the move at first, but McNair, Jones, and other owners fell in love with Kroenke's mega proposal and voted for it despite committee recommendations.
Also of note, and quite possibly the rationale behind the sweetheart rent deal, the Chargers relocation fee is estimated to be 650 million. Rams paid slightly less when they moved because Los Angeles was still considered their secondary market even after playing 20 years in St Louis. Spanos may attempt to argue Los Angeles was always a secondary market for the Chargers, but the NFL ruled several years ago that no team had a claim on the LA market and couldn't move there without approval. The Raiders relocation fee if they move to Vegas is also rumored to be in the 650 million dollar range, but it's unclear how much of that tab would be picked up by hotel and casino owners.
-
Boo fucking hoo. And of course corporatist ESPN is going to run a puff piece on how sad this move is.
Reality? Spanos is a greedy bastard who doesn't care about anything especially the viability/perception of the NFL. As George Carlin famously said, it's a club and you ain't in it.. and they don't care about you.
Are the Chargers correct? FUCK NO. The entire notion of a team is its city - without that, the team is literally nothing. Thought experiment: What, exactly, is the current Browns organization without Cleveland? Because Haslam doesn't get to take it with him.. that's Cleveland's.
I say let Spanos and his rent-a-team fail for however long it takes. He'll come crawling back and be told to sit down, shut up, and pay for a stadium renovation out of his own revenue sharing deal.
And if he doesn't, GOOD FOR SAN DIEGO. I live in a town (suburb of Boston) that happily and correctly told the Olympics to go pound sand because the economics weren't a good deal for the taxpayers.
Ultimately this is not really a commentary on the NFL as an institution --- it's a commentary on the laughable absurdity of public cost / private profit enterprises, and the continuing revolt against the economic policies of the 1% who own each individual business.
Boo fucking hoo. And of course corporatist ESPN is going to run a puff piece on how sad this move is.
Reality? Spanos is a greedy bastard who doesn't care about anything especially the viability/perception of the NFL. As George Carlin famously said, it's a club and you ain't in it.. and they don't care about you.
Are the Chargers correct? FUCK NO. The entire notion of a team is its city - without that, the team is literally nothing. Thought experiment: What, exactly, is the current Browns organization without Cleveland? Because Haslam doesn't get to take it with him.. that's Cleveland's.
I say let Spanos and his rent-a-team fail for however long it takes. He'll come crawling back and be told to sit down, shut up, and pay for a stadium renovation out of his own revenue sharing deal.
And if he doesn't, GOOD FOR SAN DIEGO. I live in a town (suburb of Boston) that happily and correctly told the Olympics to go pound sand because the economics weren't a good deal for the taxpayers.
Ultimately this is not really a commentary on the NFL as an institution --- it's a commentary on the laughable absurdity of public cost / private profit enterprises, and the continuing revolt against the economic policies of the 1% who own each individual business.
A liberal talking economics making very little sense. Shocked.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login