Skip to content

Pryor to Redskins

The Browns Board
312 51 12.4k
  • @ghoolie said:

    Pryor MAYBE is a #3 WR in Pittsburgh, Pryor is okay, that's all. A C+ grade performer.

    no maybe. He'd be a #2. Martavis Bryant is now their Gordon.Pryor's a easy B with a QB...BTW- F them Steel queers..Revis DiD

    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @gumby73 said:

    no maybe. He'd be a #2. Martavis Bryant is now their Gordon.Pryor's a easy B with a QB...BTW- F them Steel queers..Revis DiD

    Sounds like Revis knocked out a couple Pittsburgh punks who were hounding him and filming him.

    I have new respect for him.

    When the Jets cut him, we need to sign him to play free safety.

    Zombo

  • C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #12

    His lacknof production came about because teams realized he's all we got and our o line and qb's couldnt hold up their end of the deal. Tp's dangerous routes require an extra second or two for him to get deep but by that time our qb was flat on his ass and getting the smelling salts

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Revis has become alergic to tackling. No thanks.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
    #14

    @ghoolie said:

    WOW.............. can you fucking imagine this? Another non-issue that won't do cunt-fuck to win football games consuming the Browns.

    Pryor MAYBE is a #3 WR in Pittsburgh, He is an easy shut down adn resigning him means nothing without Gordon, or a Julio Jones caliber #1 WR. Pryor is okay, that's all. A C+ grade performer.

    He would be #2. Beyond A. Brown the Steelers have fuck all at WR. That was proven vs. the Pats.

    โ€‹Besides...I thought you were the one that was all about the skill players. So, which is it.....WRs, OL, nobody worth your attention?

  • Terrel Pryor at all costs.

    He is a great example and role model to a player like Josh Gordon.

    Both together would be an amazing to watch! Plus, a speedster like Coleman added to Gordon and Pryor would make it nearly impossible to stop.

    Pryor and Gordon go together like Peanut Butter and Jelly.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @poeticg said:

    Terrel Pryor at all costs.

    No... just, no...

    @tiamat63 said:

    Revis has become alergic to tackling. No thanks.

    My very first thought as well.

  • C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by Clevfan4life
    #16

    We dont exactly have playmaking freaks of nature falling in our laps every year, fucking keep pryor. From a physical standpoint he might be the most gifted wr in football, but yeah guys like him show up in berea every year looking for work so fuck it let him walk

  • C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #17

    I think you guys have to understand that ghoolies not a browns fan anymore. He wants them to do everything possible to "not" get better so they'll fold and move again. He's said it himself, he wants a new franchise in cleveland

  • I think you guys have to understand that ghoolies not a browns fan anymore. He wants them to do everything possible to "not" get better so they'll fold and move again. He's said it himself, he wants a new franchise in cleveland

    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by LogicIsForSquares
    #18

    @clevfan4life said:

    I think you guys have to understand that ghoolies not a browns fan anymore. He wants them to do everything possible to "not" get better so they'll fold and move again. He's said it himself, he wants a new franchise in cleveland

    You read far too much into the random trolling from some autistic lump.

  • We dont exactly have playmaking freaks of nature falling in our laps every year, fucking keep pryor. From a physical standpoint he might be the most gifted wr in football, but yeah guys like him show up in berea every year looking for work so fuck it let him walk

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @clevfan4life said:

    We dont exactly have playmaking freaks of nature falling in our laps every year, fucking keep pryor.

    From a physical standpoint he might be the most gifted wr in football, but yeah guys like him show up in berea every year looking for work so fuck it let him walk

    "At all costs?"

    Most physically gifted? Not feeling that... but even were I to concede that, he still has to develop a number of receiver skills to get in the best WR conversation.

  • U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
    #20

    He's good. He'll get a big contract. But he's not in the same room let alone the same conversation as the actual Pro Bowl WR's.

    I see more TP telling his nonsense agents to stop "demanding" the same deal as Dez Bryant rather than Browns management somehow deliberately low-balling.

  • OsirisO Osiris wrote on last edited by Osiris
    #21

    The agents are probably just stalling. If TP told them to get the deal done, they are just making sure they get max money for him, and only way to do that is to wait until the free-agency period opens up. I expect the deal will get done in the first week of March. TP has to do this because he's not likely to get a big-bucks next contract like a conventional standout drafted WR entering his prime would get.

  • The agents are probably just stalling. If TP told them to get the deal done, they are just making sure they get max money for him, and only way to do that is to wait until the free-agency period opens up. I expect the deal will get done in the first week of March. TP has to do this because he's not likely to get a big-bucks next contract like a conventional standout drafted WR entering his prime would get.

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @osiris said:

    The agents are probably just stalling. If TP told them to get the deal done, they are just making sure they get max money for him, and only way to do that is to wait until the free-agency period opens up. I expect the deal will get done in the first week of March. TP has to do this because he's not likely to get a big-bucks next contract like a conventional standout drafted WR entering his prime would get.

    I have a feeling he might get franchised with a view to lengthening the exclusive negotiating period through most of the offseason.

  • @osiris said:

    The agents are probably just stalling. If TP told them to get the deal done, they are just making sure they get max money for him, and only way to do that is to wait until the free-agency period opens up. I expect the deal will get done in the first week of March. TP has to do this because he's not likely to get a big-bucks next contract like a conventional standout drafted WR entering his prime would get.

    I have a feeling he might get franchised with a view to lengthening the exclusive negotiating period through most of the offseason.

    OsirisO Osiris wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @gftchris said:

    I have a feeling he might get franchised with a view to lengthening the exclusive negotiating period through most of the offseason.

    It's possible. Though the front office said they don't intend to FT him, they could be saying that to encourage his agents to stop stalling.

  • @osiris said:

    The agents are probably just stalling. If TP told them to get the deal done, they are just making sure they get max money for him, and only way to do that is to wait until the free-agency period opens up. I expect the deal will get done in the first week of March. TP has to do this because he's not likely to get a big-bucks next contract like a conventional standout drafted WR entering his prime would get.

    I have a feeling he might get franchised with a view to lengthening the exclusive negotiating period through most of the offseason.

    jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @gftchris said:

    I have a feeling he might get franchised with a view to lengthening the exclusive negotiating period through most of the offseason.

    To franchise TP would cost the Browns about $16 million dollars: http://www.pennlive.com/steelers/index.ssf/2017/02/nfl_franchise_tag_2017_position.html

    I like the guy a lot and hope we re-sign him, but that would be absurd amount of money to pay him for what he's done in his career so far. I really doubt this FO would pull that either. The guy wants to be here, we can "overpay" him to stay here on a contract, all signs point to just getting the deal done.

    My best guess because you have to tag someone is that it'll go to Colquitt.

  • @gftchris said:

    I have a feeling he might get franchised with a view to lengthening the exclusive negotiating period through most of the offseason.

    To franchise TP would cost the Browns about $16 million dollars: http://www.pennlive.com/steelers/index.ssf/2017/02/nfl_franchise_tag_2017_position.html

    I like the guy a lot and hope we re-sign him, but that would be absurd amount of money to pay him for what he's done in his career so far. I really doubt this FO would pull that either. The guy wants to be here, we can "overpay" him to stay here on a contract, all signs point to just getting the deal done.

    My best guess because you have to tag someone is that it'll go to Colquitt.

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
    #25

    @jrb12711 said:

    To franchise TP would cost the Browns about $16 million dollars: http://www.pennlive.com/steelers/index.ssf/2017/02/nfl_franchise_tag_2017_position.html

    I like the guy a lot and hope we re-sign him, but that would be absurd amount of money to pay him for what he's done in his career so far. I really doubt this FO would pull that either. The guy wants to be here, we can "overpay" him to stay here on a contract, all signs point to just getting the deal done.

    My best guess because you have to tag someone is that it'll go to Colquitt.

    We won't franchise the punter.

    I'm not saying franchise Pryor and leave it there - just use it as a tool to get more negotiating time.

  • @gftchris said:

    I have a feeling he might get franchised with a view to lengthening the exclusive negotiating period through most of the offseason.

    To franchise TP would cost the Browns about $16 million dollars: http://www.pennlive.com/steelers/index.ssf/2017/02/nfl_franchise_tag_2017_position.html

    I like the guy a lot and hope we re-sign him, but that would be absurd amount of money to pay him for what he's done in his career so far. I really doubt this FO would pull that either. The guy wants to be here, we can "overpay" him to stay here on a contract, all signs point to just getting the deal done.

    My best guess because you have to tag someone is that it'll go to Colquitt.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
    #26

    @jrb12711 said:

    To franchise TP would cost the Browns about $16 million dollars: http://www.pennlive.com/steelers/index.ssf/2017/02/nfl_franchise_tag_2017_position.html

    I like the guy a lot and hope we re-sign him, but that would be absurd amount of money to pay him for what he's done in his career so far.

    But it is still cheaper than the commitment we will have to make to him to lock him into a multi-year deal.

    If we are not sure how high his ceiling is, then the tag is a viable, smart route.

  • W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #27

    If you have the money just laying around, you might as well spend it on him. It will build up some good will on his part that you overpaid him so much, won't affect the health of our roster going forward, and will give us another year to evaluate him.

  • B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #28

    How is that Joe Haden contract working out? And how many Pro Bowls did he make.

  • How is that Joe Haden contract working out? And how many Pro Bowls did he make.

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @baconhound said:

    How is that Joe Haden contract working out? And how many Pro Bowls did he make.

    Let me try to follow the logic here - we had a good young corner that we drafted high and who played well; he went to the pro-bowl; we signed him to a long contract extension; he then went to another pro-bowl; he's been injured a lot the last couple of year; therefore we shouldn't sign anyone to a contract extension?

    Sound.

  • @jrb12711 said:

    To franchise TP would cost the Browns about $16 million dollars: http://www.pennlive.com/steelers/index.ssf/2017/02/nfl_franchise_tag_2017_position.html

    I like the guy a lot and hope we re-sign him, but that would be absurd amount of money to pay him for what he's done in his career so far.

    But it is still cheaper than the commitment we will have to make to him to lock him into a multi-year deal.

    If we are not sure how high his ceiling is, then the tag is a viable, smart route.

    jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
    #30

    @tour2ma said:

    But it is still cheaper than the commitment we will have to make to him to lock him into a multi-year deal.

    If we are not sure how high his ceiling is, then the tag is a viable, smart route.

    I'd ask you to go more into detail on this. If we keep the tag on TP as noted he would cost the Browns $16 or so million. I get and understand the idea a contract can be negotiated during this time, but assuming he signs the tag that's overpaying for TP given his career production wouldn't you agree?

    If we sign him to a contract with about that same money guaranteed (again, my target would be something like 4 yr/$35 million with $16-20 mil guaranteed) and back-load it, we would be paying the guy roughly the same amount of money over the first two years of the contract to include his guarantees. If the dudes balls out he's worth the $9-10 million you're giving him in the last two years of the deal in this back load scenario. If he bottoms out (which still is a concern of mine as it should be for the Browns) after two years you release him for the cap space. I prefer option two because it provides much more stability without nearly as much cost.