Skip to content

Pryor to Redskins

The Browns Board
312 51 12.4k
  • IMO, The Committee doesn't like him...because he opens his mouth and criticizes them for getting the QB's killed.

  • IMO, The Committee doesn't like him...because he opens his mouth and criticizes them for getting the QB's killed.

    @orion said:

    IMO, The Committee doesn't like him...because he opens his mouth and criticizes them for getting the QB's killed.

    They criticize him for being right? Letting the Schwartz go. Letting Mack go (they could have franchise tagged him Bito getting injured, the drafting of awful Cam Erving. Only the first two matters are on the hands of this FO.

  • The "committee"?

  • The "committee"?

    @tour2ma said:

    The "committee"?

    Yes, I wondered about that....who is on this committee? Sachi, Berry, Hue....the DC/OC....other personell/scout people...and of course, ultimately, Jimmy Haslam?

  • So...if the Browns Franchise Tagged Pryor it would have to be for 15.6 mill per year. But, according to this, if they Transition tag him, it would still cost them 13.1 Mill per year. But other teams could sign him to an offer sheet that the Browns have the right to match.

    Would you Transition him for 13.1 mill?

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/02/27/browns-still-dont-plan-to-tag-terrelle-pryor/

  • Sashi saying today that if Pryor doesn't return they wont panic. FUCK THAT, are we EVER going to keep anyone

  • Just posturing.

  • Why would we "panic"?

  • So...if the Browns Franchise Tagged Pryor it would have to be for 15.6 mill per year. But, according to this, if they Transition tag him, it would still cost them 13.1 Mill per year. But other teams could sign him to an offer sheet that the Browns have the right to match.

    Would you Transition him for 13.1 mill?

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/02/27/browns-still-dont-plan-to-tag-terrelle-pryor/

    @the-gipper said:

    So...if the Browns Franchise Tagged Pryor it would have to be for 15.6 mill per year. But, according to this, if they Transition tag him, it would still cost them 13.1 Mill per year. But other teams could sign him to an offer sheet that the Browns have the right to match.

    Would you Transition him for 13.1 mill?

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/02/27/browns-still-dont-plan-to-tag-terrelle-pryor/

    Well as of this writing this is officially a moot point. I feel pretty confident is us re-signing him at the moment, but we shall see how it all breaks down.

  • @the-gipper said:

    So...if the Browns Franchise Tagged Pryor it would have to be for 15.6 mill per year. But, according to this, if they Transition tag him, it would still cost them 13.1 Mill per year. But other teams could sign him to an offer sheet that the Browns have the right to match.

    Would you Transition him for 13.1 mill?

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/02/27/browns-still-dont-plan-to-tag-terrelle-pryor/

    Well as of this writing this is officially a moot point. I feel pretty confident is us re-signing him at the moment, but we shall see how it all breaks down.

    @jrb12711 said:

    Well as of this writing this is officially a moot point. I feel pretty confident is us re-signing him at the moment, but we shall see how it all breaks down.

    Yep. Apparently no tag of any sort put on TP.

    http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2017/3/1/14555886/terrelle-pryor-franchise-tag-browns-free-agency?yptr=yahoo

  • The "committee"?

    @tour2ma said:

    The "committee"?

    That's our group of Harvard decision makers.....and Hue, the football guy. His opinion is supposed to have 'some' merit also.

    Call them the Inner Circle if you like. The Analytic Associates. Or a favorite of mine, The Geek Squad.

  • @ghoolie said:

    People, are even assimilating wtf this discussion is? Terrel Pryor.............. a franchise player? Are you out of your fucking minds?

    Maybe for our franchise.....

  • Why would we "panic"?

    @tour2ma said:

    Why would we "panic"?

    Cus' we got anal-litics.

  • We don't panic at all-------we just quietly blow it, Collins being one of the few exceptions.

  • @tour2ma said:

    The "committee"?

    That's our group of Harvard decision makers.....and Hue, the football guy. His opinion is supposed to have 'some' merit also.

    Call them the Inner Circle if you like. The Analytic Associates. Or a favorite of mine, The Geek Squad.

    @orion said:

    Or a favorite of mine, The Geek Squad.

    Seconded!

  • Pryor is going to tear it up somewhere. 1000 receiving yards as a rookie receiver essentially. He did that with a carasoul of bad QB play. He can pretty much get open at will.

  • Pryor is going to tear it up somewhere. 1000 receiving yards as a rookie receiver essentially. He did that with a carasoul of bad QB play. He can pretty much get open at will.

    @jcam222 said:

    Pryor is going to tear it up somewhere. 1000 receiving yards as a rookie receiver essentially. He did that with a carasoul of bad QB play. He can pretty much get open at will.

    Had a similar year to Travis Benjamin 2015 under similar conditions

  • Oh man, think long term deal guys...

    Pryor, 5 year deal

    Gordon gets reinstated, works off the next two seasons of his rookie contract and then we resign him to another 3-5 year deal

    Coleman has 3 more season and then we resign him for 2 more years on a show me contract before extending him another 4-5 year deal.

    If everything works out as planned... WR would be a position of STRENGTH for the long term.

    Then all that we have to do is get a franchise QB and find a legitimate threat- a gamechanger at RB and our offense is just a lineman or two away from being top 3 ELITE... Imagine that shit!

  • We could actually solve that whole equation by Drafting Trubisky, Fournette, McCafferey, Elflein and Forrest Lamp?

  • Oh man, think long term deal guys...

    Pryor, 5 year deal

    Gordon gets reinstated, works off the next two seasons of his rookie contract and then we resign him to another 3-5 year deal

    Coleman has 3 more season and then we resign him for 2 more years on a show me contract before extending him another 4-5 year deal.

    If everything works out as planned... WR would be a position of STRENGTH for the long term.

    Then all that we have to do is get a franchise QB and find a legitimate threat- a gamechanger at RB and our offense is just a lineman or two away from being top 3 ELITE... Imagine that shit!

    @poeticg said:

    Oh man, think long term deal guys...

    Pryor, 5 year deal

    Gordon gets reinstated, works off the next two seasons of his rookie contract and then we resign him to another 3-5 year deal

    Coleman has 3 more season and then we resign him for 2 more years on a show me contract before extending him another 4-5 year deal.

    If everything works out as planned... WR would be a position of STRENGTH for the long term.

    Then all that we have to do is get a franchise QB and find a legitimate threat- a gamechanger at RB and our offense is just a lineman or two away from being top 3 ELITE... Imagine that shit!

    Well, I can imagine getting a date with Jennifer Garner too. 🙂 First, Gordon has to get reinstated. That's not a done deal. Second, John Clayton one of the few commentators I respect, thinks it best that the Browns move on from Josh. I do tend to agree you don't get unlimited chances. Should he get reinstated, this has to be absolutely his last chance to fly right.