owner front office different opinion then coaches?
-
La canfora... don't believe it
Every time MKC speaks this Jason La Canfora has to speak for her again.. Or sleep with her again
. Fire this Leaking spare tire named Mary would be a good start..She's a media mingling Ba FOON!! funny after 3 days we all the sudden add in a character in Haslem now wanting Trib & now the 1st split both want Garrett..what would make my day is MKC running card to Roger Every time MKC speaks this Jason La Canfora has to speak for her again.. Or sleep with her again
. Fire this Leaking spare tire named Mary would be a good start..She's a media mingling Ba FOON!! funny after 3 days we all the sudden add in a character in Haslem now wanting Trib & now the 1st split both want Garrett..what would make my day is MKC running card to Roger Mary Kay all mad because Sashi said she has the Patriots on speed dial. I don't doubt it's true. I heard more Garropolo crap to the Browns on ESPN before the Celtics-Bulls game. They won't let that one die either. Unless Sashi is totally lying- that rumor should have been dead and buried after the presser.
La-Can't-for-ya hates the Browns and his stuff is click fodder. You would hope after the Johnny Football fiasco Haslam has learned not to listen to street people, and let the Front Office do the picking.
-
He's only one player, just like everyone else. Did Wentz really change the Eagles by himself?
Nope..But I'd take Wentz over this QB draft class. Image all the free time we'd have
4 WR's minus 1 still equals us landing Kessler tooNope..But I'd take Wentz over this QB draft class.
Me too....
So, when people speculate we will trade up to get our QB, it makes me wonder why we would pass on one when we have the pick(this year AND last year).....but then suddenly give 2 firsts(or the equivalent or more) for one thats not deemed to be so great....
Doesnt make any sense....
-
Nope..But I'd take Wentz over this QB draft class.
Me too....
So, when people speculate we will trade up to get our QB, it makes me wonder why we would pass on one when we have the pick(this year AND last year).....but then suddenly give 2 firsts(or the equivalent or more) for one thats not deemed to be so great....
Doesnt make any sense....
Me too....
So, when people speculate we will trade up to get our QB, it makes me wonder why we would pass on one when we have the pick(this year AND last year).....but then suddenly give 2 firsts(or the equivalent or more) for one thats not deemed to be so great....
Doesnt make any sense....
And hopefully it doesn't make sense to the FO either.
-
Me too....
So, when people speculate we will trade up to get our QB, it makes me wonder why we would pass on one when we have the pick(this year AND last year).....but then suddenly give 2 firsts(or the equivalent or more) for one thats not deemed to be so great....
Doesnt make any sense....
And hopefully it doesn't make sense to the FO either.
And hopefully it doesn't make sense to the FO either.
Right.....that would be key.....
Shashi did say they value picks too much to want to give 2 picks for one guy.......lets hope thats true.....
And, lets also hope that they dont value 2 picks(so much) that they pass on the great players to get em......(ala 2016)
Edit: speaking on higher picks only.....no issue with grouping some late picks to move up a bit.....I just have this thing that I feel we should tap "good" players instead of larger groups of bad players.....thats just me tho
-
And hopefully it doesn't make sense to the FO either.
Right.....that would be key.....
Shashi did say they value picks too much to want to give 2 picks for one guy.......lets hope thats true.....
And, lets also hope that they dont value 2 picks(so much) that they pass on the great players to get em......(ala 2016)
Edit: speaking on higher picks only.....no issue with grouping some late picks to move up a bit.....I just have this thing that I feel we should tap "good" players instead of larger groups of bad players.....thats just me tho
-
The worst year in my career as a Browns fan.
Wait... I could have made a career out of this? How good are the bennies?
Me too....
So, when people speculate we will trade up to get our QB, it makes me wonder why we would pass on one when we have the pick(this year AND last year).....but then suddenly give 2 firsts(or the equivalent or more) for one thats not deemed to be so great....
Doesnt make any sense....
Sure it does... just as our FO is looking ahead to 2018 so were they in 2017. And in the over 30 minutes of tape they then had on Trubs, they saw greatness.
#sarcasm
-
And hopefully it doesn't make sense to the FO either.
Right.....that would be key.....
Shashi did say they value picks too much to want to give 2 picks for one guy.......lets hope thats true.....
And, lets also hope that they dont value 2 picks(so much) that they pass on the great players to get em......(ala 2016)
Edit: speaking on higher picks only.....no issue with grouping some late picks to move up a bit.....I just have this thing that I feel we should tap "good" players instead of larger groups of bad players.....thats just me tho
-
Don't believe statistically that's true (in fact I am sure it's not) on an individual basis... but so many more UDFAs attend camps than Day 3 picks that in the aggregate it may appear to be true.
The reason I am sure it's not true statistically is the Meers Chart.
-
as to the point how can garett make a difference well ask yourself how will a guy with only 13 college games make a difference?
-
He beat me by 30 seconds. I have only read Ghoolie and maybe you that want trubs number oneWe all don't believe Canfora but one or two of us? Yes, that is true.
He beat me by 30 seconds. I have only read Ghoolie and maybe you that want trubs number one
Hoorta. And I am not saying I want MT #1....but I do want him. If he goes to #12, great. (he won't slip that far). If the Browns trade up to #5 or 6, also good.
I fully expect the Browns to take Garrett. The question, for me, is how can they also get MT.
-
Well.... ok. If we take him, I won't count on him winning us any games by himself. I would count on him making an abysmal defense better.
Well.... ok. If we take him, I won't count on him winning us any games by himself. I would count on him making an abysmal defense better.
Somewhat, perhaps. But they would only be better with him and about 4-5 additional quality players.
-
Well.... ok. If we take him, I won't count on him winning us any games by himself. I would count on him making an abysmal defense better.
The abysmal defense certainly does need help doesn't it.......and so does our abysmal offense.......we were abysmal.
We were the Abominable Abysmal.
The abysmal defense certainly does need help doesn't it.......and so does our abysmal offense.......we were abysmal.
We were the Abominable Abysmal.
The OL has gotten a lot of help now. Zeitler, Tretter, Martin etc. But skill areas of improvement needed ...besides QB: a productive TE and WR.
I think we get a TE. Not sure about WR give last year's quadruple picks.
-
Nope..But I'd take Wentz over this QB draft class.
Me too....
So, when people speculate we will trade up to get our QB, it makes me wonder why we would pass on one when we have the pick(this year AND last year).....but then suddenly give 2 firsts(or the equivalent or more) for one thats not deemed to be so great....
Doesnt make any sense....
Me too....
So, when people speculate we will trade up to get our QB, it makes me wonder why we would pass on one when we have the pick(this year AND last year).....but then suddenly give 2 firsts(or the equivalent or more) for one thats not deemed to be so great....
Doesnt make any sense....
Because you are wrong and the guy that they want this year is better...in their opinion... than that guy from last year. That is why.
-
He beat me by 30 seconds. I have only read Ghoolie and maybe you that want trubs number one
Hoorta. And I am not saying I want MT #1....but I do want him. If he goes to #12, great. (he won't slip that far). If the Browns trade up to #5 or 6, also good.
I fully expect the Browns to take Garrett. The question, for me, is how can they also get MT.
Hoorta. And I am not saying I want MT #1....but I do want him. If he goes to #12, great. (he won't slip that far). If the Browns trade up to #5 or 6, also good.
I fully expect the Browns to take Garrett. The question, for me, is how can they also get MT.
Exactly Gip. Taking Mitch #1 over Garrett would be a huge risk, and would be universally critised.
I've already said the 49ers #2 is out of reach from what we'd have to give up. But if he's still there @ #5 with the Titans on the clock, it gets interesting. For all we know, the Jets who supposedly love Trubs could move up to #2. That would probably only cost them their 2018 first round pick.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login