Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Warrane Sapp say Garrett isnt worthy of #1 pick

Warrane Sapp say Garrett isnt worthy of #1 pick

The Browns Board
26 13 875

  • @ghoolie said:

    I don't know who Trubinsky is, and if he has to sit a year, so be it.

    As far as Trubisky goes, what fucking difference does it make if he has to sit? In that case, any new QB will have to sit. Build a jewel? YOu mean like the fucking piece of shit Hue and company built last year? WTF are you basing your faith on that 2017 is going to be better than the 1 - 19 shit we have now?

    The Browns need a QB....they need hope.....they need a leader. An asshole edge rusher for 188 million dollars isn't going to contribute jack shit to anything.

    Dude, every year it's one of these guys with you...

    The Browns were asshats for not drafting Paxton Lynch last year...

    Whatever fucking name you were posting under during the Osweiler draft the Browns were fucktards for not taking him that year... now we have him and he's a sack of shit.

    Can't wait to watch all the sand falling out of your vagina for the next six months when they don't take Mitch tomorrow.

    Actually hoping they do now so your damn head can spin for a few weeks while your looking for the next thing to bitch about.

    👍

  • If you put farve on this team as it stands as a whole does not mean shit. You will still lose. Build a FUCKING somewhat team. No TEAM no WINS. One out of 11 on the field dies not change the win count. This year we can add pieces that don't have to sit one or two years.

    hoortaH 1 Reply

  • Let's just be like a broken washing machine stick in spin cycle.

  • LBC mikeL LBC mike

    If you put farve on this team as it stands as a whole does not mean shit. You will still lose. Build a FUCKING somewhat team. No TEAM no WINS. One out of 11 on the field dies not change the win count. This year we can add pieces that don't have to sit one or two years.

    @lbc-mike said:

    If you put farve on this team as it stands as a whole does not mean shit. You will still lose. Build a FUCKING somewhat team. No TEAM no WINS. One out of 11 on the field dies not change the win count. This year we can add pieces that don't have to sit one or two years.

    OK, you want "immediate contributors". You're forgetting this FO is building a team for the long haul, not quick fixes, immediate impact.

  • I am tired of wasting picks hoorta. I want solid players that are solid without question marks in the first or second round. We build this through the draft. I really don't see our future QB in this class.

    Quick fixed are in free agency.

    The GipperT 1 Reply

  • Simply put.....if we draft a player at #1......then draft a QB with our 2nd first rounder.....we are following the EXACT formula previous regimes have failed with......exact

    jrb12711J The GipperT 2 Replies
  • MudflyM Mudfly

    Simply put.....if we draft a player at #1......then draft a QB with our 2nd first rounder.....we are following the EXACT formula previous regimes have failed with......exact

    Warren Sapp is a piece of shit whose opinion I hold in less regard than Ghoolies. If he's saying Myles isn't worth the 1st pick I'm even more on board with taking him.

    @mudfly said:

    Simply put.....if we draft a player at #1......then draft a QB with our 2nd first rounder.....we are following the EXACT formula previous regimes have failed with......exact

  • "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • LBC mikeL LBC mike

    I am tired of wasting picks hoorta. I want solid players that are solid without question marks in the first or second round. We build this through the draft. I really don't see our future QB in this class.

    Quick fixed are in free agency.

    @lbc-mike said:

    I am tired of wasting picks hoorta. I want solid players that are solid without question marks in the first or second round. We build this through the draft. I really don't see our future QB in this class.

    Quick fixed are in free agency.

    Of course the fact is, every single other person/position that YOU think is solid and without question mark could bust just as easily as the QB that you think would be no good.

    About the same ratio of DEs and OLBs taken in the top 10 of the draft have been busts as have QBs. Between 2000 and 2015 (not counting 2016...too early), you have the following names:

    Dante Fowler

    Jamal Reynolds

    Gaines Adams

    Derrick Harvey

    Vernon Gholston

    Dion Jordan

    Jamal Anderson

    Aldon Smith

    Courtney Brown

    So, don't be sure about what you think you know.

  • MudflyM Mudfly

    Simply put.....if we draft a player at #1......then draft a QB with our 2nd first rounder.....we are following the EXACT formula previous regimes have failed with......exact

    @mudfly said:

    Simply put.....if we draft a player at #1......then draft a QB with our 2nd first rounder.....we are following the EXACT formula previous regimes have failed with......exact

    So? You are arguing to take the QB with our first first round pick? Sounds like it.

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @mudfly said:

    Simply put.....if we draft a player at #1......then draft a QB with our 2nd first rounder.....we are following the EXACT formula previous regimes have failed with......exact

    So? You are arguing to take the QB with our first first round pick? Sounds like it.

    @the-gipper said:

    So? You are arguing to take the QB with our first first round pick? Sounds like it.

    No....Im not arguing anything....or suggesting we draft a QB at one....

    Im simply stating a fact about the Browns history(and I know you like facts and history).....

    Simply put.....I dont want to spend a 1st round pick on a qb NOT good enough to draft with our first pick...again....and again....and again.....and NOW...POTENTIALLY......again....

Log in to reply