Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. ABC Poll: If the election were held again...

ABC Poll: If the election were held again...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
6 Posts 4 Posters 499 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • StinkHole StinkHoleS One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 3k Posts
    • 365 Reputation
    StinkHoleS StinkHole wrote on last edited by StinkHole
    #1

    Stuart


    ...Trump would win again.

    You betcha ABC was chomping at the bit to conduct this poll hoping for a much different result.

    http://ijr.com/2017/04/855544-2016-election-held-trumps-first-100-days-heres-happen/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Owned&utm_term=ijamerica&utm_campaign=ods&utm_content=Politics

    If the 2016 Election Were Held Again After Trump's First 100 Days, Here's What Would Happen...

    BY JASON HOWERTON
    If the 2016 presidential election were held again today, Hillary Clinton would receive even fewer votes and Donald Trump would still be the president, according to ABC News.

    President Trump has the lowest approval rating of any president since 1945 as he nears his 100th day in office. However, the vast majority of Americans who voted for him in 2016 apparently have no regrets and would vote for him again today.

    The same can’t be said for Hillary Clinton.

    An astonishing 96 percent of people who voted for Trump in November said they would vote for him again if the election was held today, according to ABC’s polling. On the other hand, only 85 percent of Clinton voters said they would cast another vote for the Democratic candidate.

    ABC News adds more context to the numbers:

    Among Americans who say they voted in the 2016 election, 46 percent say they voted for Hillary Clinton and 43 percent for Trump, very close to the 2-point margin in the actual popular vote results. However, while Trump would retain almost all of his support if the election were held again today (96 percent), fewer of Clinton's supporters say they'd stick with her (85 percent), producing a 40-43 percent Clinton-Trump result in this hypothetical re-do among self-reported 2016 voters.

    That's not because former Clinton supporters would now back Trump; only 2 percent of them say they'd do so, similar to the 1 percent of Trump voters who say they'd switch to Clinton. Instead, they're more apt to say they'd vote for a third-party candidate or wouldn't vote.

    In a cautionary note to her party, Clinton's 6-point drop in a hypothetical mulligan election relates to views of whether the Democratic Party is in touch with peoples' concerns. Although the sample sizes are small, those who say the party is out of touch are less likely to say they'd support Clinton again, compared with those who see it as in touch.

    That’s not to say that Trump doesn’t have his own polling problems. Just 42 percent of Americans approve of Trump’s job performance so far. In comparison, Barack Obama saw a 69 percent approval rating during his first 100 days in office.

    Further, 60 percent said they doubted Trump’s honesty and trustworthiness and 55 percent say his policy agenda is not driven by a clear set of principles.

    But Americans gave Trump good grades for his initiative to keep jobs in the United States by pressuring companies — with 73 percent approving his tactics. In another important measure, 53 percent of Americans see Trump as a strong leader.

    Bottom line: Even if Democrats got a second chance at the election today, they'd still lose to Trump.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
      • 11k Posts
      • 3k Reputation
      OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I read where the networks nightly news has run about 90 percent unfavorable coverage on Trump. The only thing that surprises me is after watching the nightly news for many months now I have yet to find that 10 percent favorable coverage. Even if a story is favorable such as the saving jobs at Carrier the evening news found fault with the number of jobs Trump claimed were saved and the concessions made to keep the jobs at Carrier. Even on a positive story like this they were able to find plenty of fault with Trump like they always do. Biased, corrupt, liberal MSM.

      StinkHoleS 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
        • 64k Posts
        • 8k Reputation
        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
        #3

        there has to be invisible money flowing from soros funded groups. the msm is way too consistently

        in their camp.

        Or, they fear the activist, rich, corrupt left enough to suck up to them.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

          I read where the networks nightly news has run about 90 percent unfavorable coverage on Trump. The only thing that surprises me is after watching the nightly news for many months now I have yet to find that 10 percent favorable coverage. Even if a story is favorable such as the saving jobs at Carrier the evening news found fault with the number of jobs Trump claimed were saved and the concessions made to keep the jobs at Carrier. Even on a positive story like this they were able to find plenty of fault with Trump like they always do. Biased, corrupt, liberal MSM.

          StinkHole StinkHoleS One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 3k Posts
          • 365 Reputation
          StinkHoleS StinkHole wrote on last edited by StinkHole
          #4

          @oldbrownsfan said:

          I read where the networks nightly news has run about 90 percent unfavorable coverage on Trump. The only thing that surprises me is after watching the nightly news for many months now I have yet to find that 10 percent favorable coverage. Even if a story is favorable such as the saving jobs at Carrier the evening news found fault with the number of jobs Trump claimed were saved and the concessions made to keep the jobs at Carrier. Even on a positive story like this they were able to find plenty of fault with Trump like they always do. Biased, corrupt, liberal MSM.

          The MSM id hell bent on bringing Trump down. That is their mission.

          Here is how they pull people in.

          Take a page like this...they give you the illusion of honest reporting.

          A lot of good informative legit stuff...health, sports, trivia, history, entertainment...then thrown in with all of that is politics, and when it comes to Trump or the Republicans, its always negative 100%, and they always picture him either looking befuddled or mad.

          http://www.msn.com/?pc=EUPP_UE13&ocid=UE13DHP

          OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
          👍
          Quote Reply
          • StinkHoleS StinkHole

            @oldbrownsfan said:

            I read where the networks nightly news has run about 90 percent unfavorable coverage on Trump. The only thing that surprises me is after watching the nightly news for many months now I have yet to find that 10 percent favorable coverage. Even if a story is favorable such as the saving jobs at Carrier the evening news found fault with the number of jobs Trump claimed were saved and the concessions made to keep the jobs at Carrier. Even on a positive story like this they were able to find plenty of fault with Trump like they always do. Biased, corrupt, liberal MSM.

            The MSM id hell bent on bringing Trump down. That is their mission.

            Here is how they pull people in.

            Take a page like this...they give you the illusion of honest reporting.

            A lot of good informative legit stuff...health, sports, trivia, history, entertainment...then thrown in with all of that is politics, and when it comes to Trump or the Republicans, its always negative 100%, and they always picture him either looking befuddled or mad.

            http://www.msn.com/?pc=EUPP_UE13&ocid=UE13DHP

            OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
            • 11k Posts
            • 3k Reputation
            OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by OldBrownsFan
            #5

            @stinkhole said:

            The MSM id hell bent on bringing Trump down. That is their mission.

            Here is how they pull people in.

            Take a page like this...they give you the illusion of honest reporting.

            A lot of good informative legit stuff...health, sports, trivia, history, entertainment...then thrown in with all of that is politics, and when it comes to Trump or the Republicans, its always negative 100%, and they always picture him either looking befuddled or mad.

            http://www.msn.com/?pc=EUPP_UE13&ocid=UE13DHP

            I would also add this one. Same way with good info on a number of issues but when it comes to Trump or conservatives the stories are almost always negative.

            https://www.google.com/search?q=yahoo+news+liberal#q=yahoo+news+

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
              • 33k Posts
              • 3k Reputation
              MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Damn mainstream liberal Hillary loving media posting polls that show Trump winning again. I mean how anti Trump can they be?

              Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply

              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

              Register Login
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              Theme
              • System
              • Light
              • Dark
              The Browns Board Terms Privacy

              The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Forums
              • Recent
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Donate