Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Sashi Brown: "We Have Never Engaged In Trade Talks About Kirk Cousins"

Sashi Brown: "We Have Never Engaged In Trade Talks About Kirk Cousins"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
26 Posts 14 Posters 751 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
    • 30k Posts
    • 6k Reputation
    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #1

    http://cleveland.cbslocal.com/2017/05/02/sashi-brown-we-have-never-engaged-in-trade-talks-about-kirk-cousins/

    In a related story there was a "report" that we had made an offer that WSH "laughed at". Turns out that they were indeed laughing, but it was at reports that we were in serious negotiations with them for Cousins...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • LondonBrown L Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 4k Posts
      • 918 Reputation
      L LondonBrown wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Rappaport is consistently wrong. Only has his job due to his Patriot connections.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
        • 39k Posts
        • 9k Reputation
        W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
        #3

        For some reason it's hard to put any stock whatsoever in anything that anybody in the front office says. Call me a cynic.

        ?

        WSS

        www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
        Tour2maT 1 Reply Last reply
        👍
        Quote Reply
        • jcam222 jcam222J Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 3k Posts
          • 873 Reputation
          jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
          #4

          In corporate speak that means " We have had extensive discussions regarding discussions but couldn't get it done"

          1 Reply Last reply
          👍
          Quote Reply
          • Bob806 Bob806B Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 5k Posts
            • 2k Reputation
            Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by
            #5

            The national media makes shit up about teams constantly, just to reel everybody in. Unless those teams are the beloved Packers, Steelers, Broncos,Patriots, Cowboys or Giants...then it's probably true.

            Karlis Missed
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • gumby73 gumby73G Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 11k Posts
              • 4k Reputation
              gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
              #6

              MKC--ok. ok. Yes I Do you have Cousins on speed dial also 😛

              Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson
              Canton MikeC 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • gumby73G gumby73

                MKC--ok. ok. Yes I Do you have Cousins on speed dial also 😛

                Canton Mike Canton MikeC
                • 4k Posts
                • 2k Reputation
                Canton MikeC Canton Mike wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @gumby73 said:

                MKC--ok. ok. Yes I Do you have Cousins on speed dial also 😛

                Yeah...ONEIL Cousins!!! LOL

                Mike

                IN DORSEY I TRUST
                1 Reply Last reply
                👍
                Quote Reply
                • W Westside Steve

                  For some reason it's hard to put any stock whatsoever in anything that anybody in the front office says. Call me a cynic.

                  ?

                  WSS

                  Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                  • 30k Posts
                  • 6k Reputation
                  Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @westside-steve said:

                  For some reason it's hard to put any stock whatsoever in anything that anybody in the front office says. Call me a cynic.

                  After disparaging our FO, why would you expect us to be so nice?

                  @gumby73 said:

                  MKC--ok. ok. Yes I Do you have Cousins on speed dial also 😛

                  Hay... apparently we called NE one last time on Day 2...

                  "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • nickers nickersN Conversation Starter Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                    • 14k Posts
                    • 5k Reputation
                    nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    The Browns could've saved them selves the trouble and just drafted Trubisky.. As usual.. they outsmart themselves..

                    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
                    T The GipperT LogicIsForSquaresL 3 Replies Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • nickersN nickers

                      The Browns could've saved them selves the trouble and just drafted Trubisky.. As usual.. they outsmart themselves..

                      TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 23k Posts
                      • 6k Reputation
                      T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
                      #10

                      @nickers said:

                      The Browns could've saved them selves the trouble and just drafted Trubisky.. As usual.. they outsmart themselves..

                      Just more words to eat as he bombs in Chicago and the Browns build a defense to contend with. Chicago screwed the pooch in this draft. I think the Browns played a great smoke game and scared a lot of teams into taking QBs from a mediocre class too early and increasing their own options for great players in the process.

                      The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • nickersN nickers

                        The Browns could've saved them selves the trouble and just drafted Trubisky.. As usual.. they outsmart themselves..

                        The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                        • 57k Posts
                        • 4k Reputation
                        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @nickers said:

                        The Browns could've saved them selves the trouble and just drafted Trubisky.. As usual.. they outsmart themselves..

                        Water over the Bridge now. We gotta roll with what we got.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • T TexasAg1969

                          @nickers said:

                          The Browns could've saved them selves the trouble and just drafted Trubisky.. As usual.. they outsmart themselves..

                          Just more words to eat as he bombs in Chicago and the Browns build a defense to contend with. Chicago screwed the pooch in this draft. I think the Browns played a great smoke game and scared a lot of teams into taking QBs from a mediocre class too early and increasing their own options for great players in the process.

                          The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                          • 57k Posts
                          • 4k Reputation
                          The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @texasag1969 said:

                          Just more words to eat as he bombs in Chicago and the Browns build a defense to contend with. Chicago screwed the pooch in this draft. I think the Browns played a great smoke game and scared a lot of teams into taking QBs from a mediocre class too early and increasing their own options for great players in the process.

                          No, getting both of them would have been the ideal scenario. Bears got a guy to compete with Aaron Rodgers in that division. (or..to take over from his as the supreme QB there.) Bears made big move to get him. Browns would have made a big move to do so just a bit further down, but were trumped by the Bears.

                          T 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • The GipperT The Gipper

                            @texasag1969 said:

                            Just more words to eat as he bombs in Chicago and the Browns build a defense to contend with. Chicago screwed the pooch in this draft. I think the Browns played a great smoke game and scared a lot of teams into taking QBs from a mediocre class too early and increasing their own options for great players in the process.

                            No, getting both of them would have been the ideal scenario. Bears got a guy to compete with Aaron Rodgers in that division. (or..to take over from his as the supreme QB there.) Bears made big move to get him. Browns would have made a big move to do so just a bit further down, but were trumped by the Bears.

                            TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 23k Posts
                            • 6k Reputation
                            T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
                            #13

                            @the-gipper said:

                            No, getting both of them would have been the ideal scenario. Bears got a guy to compete with Aaron Rodgers in that division. (or..to take over from his as the supreme QB there.) Bears made big move to get him. Browns would have made a big move to do so just a bit further down, but were trumped by the Bears.

                            Chicago would have taken him for nothing @ #3, so Browns had no move "a bit further down".

                            Here is the real question. Had Kizer come out after the 2015 season would he have gone a lot higher than 2nd round?

                            The GipperT Tour2maT 2 Replies Last reply
                            👍
                            Quote Reply
                            • T TexasAg1969

                              @the-gipper said:

                              No, getting both of them would have been the ideal scenario. Bears got a guy to compete with Aaron Rodgers in that division. (or..to take over from his as the supreme QB there.) Bears made big move to get him. Browns would have made a big move to do so just a bit further down, but were trumped by the Bears.

                              Chicago would have taken him for nothing @ #3, so Browns had no move "a bit further down".

                              Here is the real question. Had Kizer come out after the 2015 season would he have gone a lot higher than 2nd round?

                              The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                              • 57k Posts
                              • 4k Reputation
                              The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @texasag1969 said:

                              Chicago would have taken him for nothing @ #3, so Browns had no move "a bit further down".

                              Right.....but the Browns could have had a move UP to the Niners. That is what the Bears wanted to avoid...ergo their offer.

                              Now, maybe Niners would not have taken a chance on losing Thomas...or maybe they would have taken such a chance if the Browns offer were sweet enough, but Browns apparently did not want to get completely raked...and thus declined what the Niners may have been asking for.

                              We all don't know what was going on in the backrooms. There was clearly some wheeling and dealing....as the pick took right up to the last moment to be made....and the Bears didn't even call MT to let them know they were taking him. He heard it from the podium. It was probably that close of a deal.

                              Here is the real question. Had Kizer come out after the 2015 season would he have gone a lot higher than 2nd round?

                              Its not a real question at all. It didn't happen so the question is completely moot.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • jiggins7919 jiggins7919J Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 5k Posts
                                • 1k Reputation
                                jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                It just goes to show you that the NFL writers literally don't know anything. Reporters can say anything they want and then claim "unnamed sources" or "a person involved with the team" or some crap, and then say, "I would never reveal my sources!" It's crap.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • nickersN nickers

                                  The Browns could've saved them selves the trouble and just drafted Trubisky.. As usual.. they outsmart themselves..

                                  LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 10k Posts
                                  • 2k Reputation
                                  LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @nickers said:

                                  The Browns could've saved them selves the trouble and just drafted Trubisky.. As usual.. they outsmart themselves..

                                  Ghoolie will give you a firm pat on the head for that one. You might even get to sleep at the foot of the bed.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • T TexasAg1969

                                    @the-gipper said:

                                    No, getting both of them would have been the ideal scenario. Bears got a guy to compete with Aaron Rodgers in that division. (or..to take over from his as the supreme QB there.) Bears made big move to get him. Browns would have made a big move to do so just a bit further down, but were trumped by the Bears.

                                    Chicago would have taken him for nothing @ #3, so Browns had no move "a bit further down".

                                    Here is the real question. Had Kizer come out after the 2015 season would he have gone a lot higher than 2nd round?

                                    Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                    • 30k Posts
                                    • 6k Reputation
                                    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @texasag1969 said:

                                    Here is the real question. Had Kizer come out after the 2015 season would he have gone a lot higher than 2nd round?

                                    No... ya know why?

                                    Because...

                                    Wait for it....

                                    ... he would've only had 13 starts...

                                    lmao... sometimes I just kill myself...

                                    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    👍
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                      • 57k Posts
                                      • 4k Reputation
                                      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      4799636-352-k486705.jpg

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                        • 57k Posts
                                        • 4k Reputation
                                        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        yo-mamma-joke.jpg

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • RoyceRolls R
                                          • 1k Posts
                                          • 345 Reputation
                                          R RoyceRolls wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          I think the whole "trade up for Trubisky" was just smoke the whole time. If they thought he was worth an early 1st plus extra picks, they would've taken him at 1. If Trubisky was there at 52, they would've taken him there.

                                          The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate