Skip to content

The Team of the Decade 2010s

The Cavs Board
5 2 944
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Here is my updated Team of the Decade listing for the NBA.

    Recall how this point system works (same for all 3 sports that I keep track of here: MLB, NFL, NBA):

    The Champion gets 10 points, the runnerup gets 6 points, the two losers of the conference finals get 3 points, and any other team that makes the playoffs gets 1 point. We have gone now through 8 years of the 2010s...and as you will see, the ultimate title is up for grabs at this point. Point totals for the 8 years are accumulated up to this point. Here is the current order:

    Miami Heat 34 pts

    Warriors 28 pts.

    Spurs 26 pts.

    Cavaliers 23 pts

    Thunder 18 pts.

    Celtics 16 pts

    Mavericks 15 pts.

    Lakers 13 pts.

    Hawks 10 pts.

    Pacers 10 pts.

    Grizzlies 9 pts.

    Bulls 8 pts.

    Rockets 7 pts.

    Clippers 6 pts.

    Raptors 6 pts.

    Blazers 6 pts

    Magic 5 pts.

    Nuggets 4 pts

    Bucks 4 pts.

    Jazz 3 pts

    Knicks 3 pts.

    Suns 3 pts.

    Nets 3 pts.

    Wizards 3 pts.

    Hornets 3 pts.

    Pelicans 2 pts.

    76ers 2 pts

    Pistons 1 pt.

    Kings -0- pts.

    T-wolves -0- pts.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
    #2

    Previous Teams of the Decades:

    2000s: LA Lakers finished with 55 pts, Spurs 40, Piston 31

    1990s: Bulls 65 pts, Rockets 29, Jazz 26

    1980s: LA Lakers 72 pts, Celtics 53, 76ers 32

    1970s Indiana Pacers (as a result of ABA performance) 43 pts. NY Knicks and Washington Bullets (nka Wizards) 34 pts.

    1960s Boston Celtics 93 points (won 9 out of the 10 titles) LA Lakers 44 pts. (lost 6 of those titles to Celts). Hawks 29 pts

    1950s Minneapolis Lakers 56 pts Syracuse Nationals (nka Phil. 76ers) 39 pts, Celtics 38 pts.

    1940s Warriors (in Philly) 17 pts. Lakers 10 pts, Chicago Stags and Washington Capitols 10 pts (last two teams now defunct)

  • mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28
    #3

    Miami Heat 34 pts

    Warriors 28 pts.

    Spurs 26 pts.

    Cavaliers 23 pts <--- CAVS #23 how ironic.

    Seems strange seeing Cleveland and a "decade of" designation of any kind.....lately.

    Oh the Indians highest winning percentage decade ever the 1950s, good decade for the BROWNS also.

  • Miami Heat 34 pts

    Warriors 28 pts.

    Spurs 26 pts.

    Cavaliers 23 pts <--- CAVS #23 how ironic.

    Seems strange seeing Cleveland and a "decade of" designation of any kind.....lately.

    Oh the Indians highest winning percentage decade ever the 1950s, good decade for the BROWNS also.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @mjp28 said:

    Miami Heat 34 pts

    Warriors 28 pts.

    Spurs 26 pts.

    Cavaliers 23 pts <--- CAVS #23 how ironic.

    Seems strange seeing Cleveland and a "decade of" designation of any kind.....lately.

    Oh the Indians highest winning percentage decade ever the 1950s, good decade for the BROWNS also.

    If you go to my NFL team of the Decade thread you will see that the Browns were the "Team of the Decade of the 50s....but the Indians came no where close....that was during the Yankees run.

  • @mjp28 said:

    Miami Heat 34 pts

    Warriors 28 pts.

    Spurs 26 pts.

    Cavaliers 23 pts <--- CAVS #23 how ironic.

    Seems strange seeing Cleveland and a "decade of" designation of any kind.....lately.

    Oh the Indians highest winning percentage decade ever the 1950s, good decade for the BROWNS also.

    If you go to my NFL team of the Decade thread you will see that the Browns were the "Team of the Decade of the 50s....but the Indians came no where close....that was during the Yankees run.

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @the-gipper said:

    If you go to my NFL team of the Decade thread you will see that the Browns were the "Team of the Decade of the 50s....but the Indians came no where close....that was during the Yankees run.

    Yeah or put another way since the 1920s, why? Because they have the best fans there in the Bronx. 😆

    Or they got the buying up talent thing down early especially from smaller market teams.