Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Brock O to Colts?

Brock O to Colts?

The Browns Board
29 18 1.4k
  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @hoorta said:

    Gip I'm not sure the Browns would bring in a vet QB if Brock gets traded. The list of potential replacements is unappealing, to say the least. 

    So, they would just go with Kessler, Kizer and Hogan?  I don't know about that there.  In fact, if B.O. gets traded...or cut,  do NOT be surprised if in fact CK were to land here (don't want to start the diatribes on that...its just, football wise, a possibility)

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #18

    @the-gipper said:

    So, they would just go with Kessler, Kizer and Hogan?  I don't know about that there.  In fact, if B.O. gets traded...or cut,  do NOT be surprised if in fact CK were to land here (don't want to start the diatribes on that...its just, football wise, a possibility)

    Yup, I really think so... Kessler isn't a rookie, neither is Hogan. They both have 2 years in Hue's system.  Remote possibility about CK Gip. Like what can he teach them? How to avoid prepatellar bursitis from kneeling too much?  🙄

    @mark-o said:

    I don't think CK has any chance of coming here.  If they were remotely interested, he would've been here already.

    Apparently CK wants starter money- and we're not paying him that to be a backup. 

  • Canton MikeC Canton Mike wrote on
    #19

    @boo-fagley said:

    Yes, but is 1 Kizer, 2 Kessler and 3 Hogan doable? Id say yes.

    Given low expectations for the Browns, I agree. If push comes to shove, pull a cheap option off the scrap heap. We may end up with a cheap diamond in the rough...we'll see.

    Mike

    IN DORSEY I TRUST
  • Z Zombo wrote on
    #20

    @boo-fagley said:

    Also, Houston is in a win now mode and the Browns traded a 2017 4th which was basically a 3rd.

    Nope, it's basically a 4th, Farley.

    Z

  • OrionO Orion wrote on
    #21

    I find it difficult to believe that anyone would want Brock.

    Here we are with basically a guy entering his junior year in college, a mediocre late third round pick, a guy named Hogan and Brock....and we've pretty much announced that Brock cannot beat out the college junior or the mediocre 3rd round pick as our starter.

    I mean, if Brock can't start for US, then who the hell else would give us a bag of barbeque chips for him?  (I wouldn't...but that's just because I cherish barbeque chips)

    -  Personally, I think there's still a chance that he starts game 1 for us.  If Kizer bombs out against the #1 defense(s) and Kessler follows suite, then the Ostrich would probably be the default starter.  

    BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on
    #22

    Brock could be a better QB than Kessler or Kizer. That's not out of the question. But Kizer is close enough and has much more upside. It's not his current skill that puts him over Brock, but instead it's the long term plan.

    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #23

    @boo-fagley said:

     tsulaofu, nevertheless the Texans are in a win now season.

    Texans make no cents$..They add 10M to their Cap by peddling off Brock to Browns. But let their pro bowl LT Dwayne Brown sit out camp deserving to get paid. Not sure if they have spent a dime in this off-season..they may need a Savage to run around back there to play dodge ball.. 

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
    👍
  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on
    #24

    If we trade Brock we are eating a large sum of that salary which is fine. 

    The issue is who in God's name would trade anything of value for this guy? He's got enough film and enough years in the league to know the player he is. The dude is Brandon Weeden 2.0, and at this point he'd be of more value 3rd string for Cleveland than a 7th round pick or w/e low ball we'd get. 

  • Mark OM Mark O

    @ibleedbrown said:

    Not sure l follow this part because why would Houston give is a 2nd to take him off their hands if there wasn't a financial benefit? Otherwise they would just cut him. All the news at the time of the trade made it sound like we were on the hook for 16 mil no matter what.

    We took on the contract and got the 2nd round pick to take the contract off the Texans books. 

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #25

    @mark-o said:

    We took on the contract and got the 2nd round pick to take the contract off the Texans books. 

    Folks may remember that Houston thought it was in the Romo Sweepstakes at the time...

    @boo-fagley said:

    Ok, heres some clarity in regards to Oswieilers contract.

    His signing bonus of 12 million has been fully paid, they are virtually always guaranteed. Under the "signing" column, $3 million is listed and that is spread out equally over 4 years. Its not listed on the spreadsheet which is somewhat confusing, but at the bottom is shows his "dead cap money"  is $9 million. Houston already took the cap hit in 2016 for the first installment of $3 million. The remaining $9 million accelerates onto the 2017 Houston cap.

    Actually the full 12 was paid in 2016... thus the term signing bonus. 😉

    My fav cap site, Over-the-cap, has a section for each player tabulating earnings to date that showed Brock pulling in $21mm in 2016.

    @boo-fagley said:

    Alright, BOs 2017 salary was guaranteed. I didnt know that.

    Your spotrac link showed this by showing his $16mm 2017 "salary" as "dead money".

    I don't think there's a single cap site that gets everything correct and makes it easy to understand, but OTC seems to come closest.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #26

    @boo-fagley said:

    Obrien will be fired.

    I'm not sure there will be a safer bet all season...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #27

    Colts apparently not the only possible trade partner for B.O.:   Jets, Ravens, Jags as well:

    http://brownswire.usatoday.com/2017/08/24/4-potential-trade-destinations-for-brock-osweiler/

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    Colts apparently not the only possible trade partner for B.O.:   Jets, Ravens, Jags as well:

    http://brownswire.usatoday.com/2017/08/24/4-potential-trade-destinations-for-brock-osweiler/

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on
    #28

    @the-gipper said:

    Colts apparently not the only possible trade partner for B.O.:   Jets, Ravens, Jags as well:

    http://brownswire.usatoday.com/2017/08/24/4-potential-trade-destinations-for-brock-osweiler/

    " Without knowing the potential likelihood of any of these possibilities, if any exists at all, here are four teams that could be in the market for Osweiler. "

    Not so great an article with this phrase in it.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #29

    @boo-fagley said:

    John Fox and Todd Bowles are in the same boat as Obrien

    I think Fox is relatively safe so long as he doesn't stick with Ichabod too long... expectations are much higher in Houston.

    Bowles? Yeah, if for no other reason to prove there is no justice in the world given that QB trio...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    👍
Log in to reply