Skip to content

NFL struggles in LA

The Browns Board
87 20 2.7k
  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #5

    The sushi crowd are not real NFL fans.  (yes, it's a sweeping generalization) 

  • @alkid3 said:

    That's because LA needs just 1 team. And besides they are more of a Basketball Baseball city. 

    LA didn't need or really want 1 team let alone 2.  The Rams at least have some sort of following but for the 500th time, the Raiders are the most popular team in LA.  The Rams are a distant 2nd and the Chargers aren't even in the race.  Wait till that little soccer stadium is filled with fans of the opposing team to watch the Chargers.

    A Alkid3 wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @mark-o said:

    LA didn't need or really want 1 team let alone 2.  The Rams at least have some sort of following but for the 500th time, the Raiders are the most popular team in LA.  The Rams are a distant 2nd and the Chargers aren't even in the race.  Wait till that little soccer stadium is filled with fans of the opposing team to watch the Chargers.

    Agree. Chargers should go somewhere else. Atleast Rams have somewhat of a chance to succeed.

  • @alkid3 said:

    That's because LA needs just 1 team. And besides they are more of a Basketball Baseball city. 

    LA didn't need or really want 1 team let alone 2.  The Rams at least have some sort of following but for the 500th time, the Raiders are the most popular team in LA.  The Rams are a distant 2nd and the Chargers aren't even in the race.  Wait till that little soccer stadium is filled with fans of the opposing team to watch the Chargers.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @mark-o said:

    LA didn't need or really want 1 team let alone 2.  The Rams at least have some sort of following but for the 500th time, the Raiders are the most popular team in LA.  The Rams are a distant 2nd and the Chargers aren't even in the race.  Wait till that little soccer stadium is filled with fans of the opposing team to watch the Chargers.

    Including Browns fans in December?

  • @alkid3 said:

    That's because LA needs just 1 team. And besides they are more of a Basketball Baseball city. 

    LA didn't need or really want 1 team let alone 2.  The Rams at least have some sort of following but for the 500th time, the Raiders are the most popular team in LA.  The Rams are a distant 2nd and the Chargers aren't even in the race.  Wait till that little soccer stadium is filled with fans of the opposing team to watch the Chargers.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @mark-o said:

    LA didn't need or really want 1 team let alone 2.

    Oh they wanted them... both of them. They just won't support them...

  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on last edited by
    #9

    L.A. didn't want an NFL team there...the NFL wanted a team there.

  • L.A. didn't want an NFL team there...the NFL wanted a team there.

    nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @canton-dawg said:

    L.A. didn't want an NFL team there...the NFL wanted a team there.

    It all boils down to greed...

  • L.A. didn't want an NFL team there...the NFL wanted a team there.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @canton-dawg said:

    L.A. didn't want an NFL team there...the NFL wanted a team there.

    Yes

  • @canton-dawg said:

    L.A. didn't want an NFL team there...the NFL wanted a team there.

    It all boils down to greed...

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @nickers said:

    It all boils down to greed...

    And Yes again.

    I mean...is a new stadium in LA really going to make the NFL all that much more money (if at all) than having teams in SD or St. L?.

  • @nickers said:

    It all boils down to greed...

    And Yes again.

    I mean...is a new stadium in LA really going to make the NFL all that much more money (if at all) than having teams in SD or St. L?.

    nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by nickers
    #13

    @the-gipper said:

    And Yes again.

    I mean...is a new stadium in LA really going to make the NFL all that much more money (if at all) than having teams in SD or St. L?.

    Not to sound redundant But, I think we can all agree a team is in LA is simply for greed #1.. Image #2.. And it becomes the NFL's personal love child so to speak.. The NFL will make sure they have a good team put together , regardless of what Krohnke does.. They will force him to do it.. Or force him to sell the franchise.

    Edit: The NFL does not like being made a fool of...

  • @mark-o said:

    LA didn't need or really want 1 team let alone 2.  The Rams at least have some sort of following but for the 500th time, the Raiders are the most popular team in LA.  The Rams are a distant 2nd and the Chargers aren't even in the race.  Wait till that little soccer stadium is filled with fans of the opposing team to watch the Chargers.

    Including Browns fans in December?

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @the-gipper said:

    Including Browns fans in December?

    I would think so.   They were struggling to get fans to show up for the exhibition games.

  • @mark-o said:

    LA didn't need or really want 1 team let alone 2.  The Rams at least have some sort of following but for the 500th time, the Raiders are the most popular team in LA.  The Rams are a distant 2nd and the Chargers aren't even in the race.  Wait till that little soccer stadium is filled with fans of the opposing team to watch the Chargers.

    Including Browns fans in December?

    A Alkid3 wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @the-gipper said:

    Including Browns fans in December?

    Yes ill be there. ?

  • L.A. didn't want an NFL team there...the NFL wanted a team there.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @canton-dawg said:

    L.A. didn't want an NFL team there...the NFL wanted a team there.

    ^^^

    @the-gipper said:

    And Yes again.

    I mean...is a new stadium in LA really going to make the NFL all that much more money (if at all) than having teams in SD or St. L?.

    Um, no. 

    @nickers said:

    Not to sound redundant But, I think we can all agree a team is in LA is simply for greed #1.. Image #2.. And it becomes the NFL's personal love child so to speak.. The NFL will make sure they have a good team put together , regardless of what Krohnke does.. They will force him to do it.. Or force him to sell the franchise.

    Edit: The NFL does not like being made a fool of...

    They're already being made a fool of in cities like San Diego and St Louis. They don't care. As the Bible says "pride goeth before a fall". The megaplex probably will draw fans for a year or two, but after that- lotsa luck. 

    Screw the love child and screw (Missouri) Kroenke. It would warm my heart if the Lambs fall flat on their face in LA, playing to empty stadiums. Nothing lasts forever- and look for soccer to overtake the NFL- sooner rather than later.  

  • @canton-dawg said:

    L.A. didn't want an NFL team there...the NFL wanted a team there.

    ^^^

    @the-gipper said:

    And Yes again.

    I mean...is a new stadium in LA really going to make the NFL all that much more money (if at all) than having teams in SD or St. L?.

    Um, no. 

    @nickers said:

    Not to sound redundant But, I think we can all agree a team is in LA is simply for greed #1.. Image #2.. And it becomes the NFL's personal love child so to speak.. The NFL will make sure they have a good team put together , regardless of what Krohnke does.. They will force him to do it.. Or force him to sell the franchise.

    Edit: The NFL does not like being made a fool of...

    They're already being made a fool of in cities like San Diego and St Louis. They don't care. As the Bible says "pride goeth before a fall". The megaplex probably will draw fans for a year or two, but after that- lotsa luck. 

    Screw the love child and screw (Missouri) Kroenke. It would warm my heart if the Lambs fall flat on their face in LA, playing to empty stadiums. Nothing lasts forever- and look for soccer to overtake the NFL- sooner rather than later.  

    nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @hoorta said:

    ^^^

    Um, no. 

    They're already being made a fool of in cities like San Diego and St Louis. They don't care. As the Bible says "pride goeth before a fall". The megaplex probably will draw fans for a year or two, but after that- lotsa luck. 

    Screw the love child and screw (Missouri) Kroenke. It would warm my heart if the Lambs fall flat on their face in LA, playing to empty stadiums. Nothing lasts forever- and look for soccer to overtake the NFL- sooner rather than later.  

    Agreed.. But I'm not sure Zombo would like it..

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #18

    This Board has taken a noticeable turn to the theological...

  • @the-gipper said:

    Including Browns fans in December?

    Yes ill be there. ?

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @alkid3 said:

    Yes ill be there. ?

    I will not... 

  • This Board has taken a noticeable turn to the theological...

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
    #20

    @tour2ma said:

    This Board has taken a noticeable turn to the theological...

    And I have stepped back from that since it usually leads nowhere worthwhile. At least on the political board Trump finally betrayed the Trumpettes with his embrace of Shumer/Pelosi. 30 pieces of silver anyone?😄

  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by D Bone
    #21

    Lived in the LA 'area' my whole life and couldn't care less about the local teams. In the 70s (I'm 49) I kind of liked the Goats as a kid, but soon fell in love with the Browns. There is just so much to do here all year long which allows a lot of us to outdoor stuff on Sundays, even in the "winter"..... It's just weird, no one really cares about going to watch a local NFL game. I of course have been to tons of games - mainly to watch the Browns, but all of my friends don't even know how to spell NFL much less go to a game. 

    The Rams moving back I could see working - maybe, but moving the Chargers here was mind boggling. I don't care how many people live in the "#2 market", they/we just won't come. In 20 years either the Goats or Bolts, or both, will have been in their new home for several years.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #22

    And here I thought you were an old, transplanted Cleveland Rams fan...

  • Lived in the LA 'area' my whole life and couldn't care less about the local teams. In the 70s (I'm 49) I kind of liked the Goats as a kid, but soon fell in love with the Browns. There is just so much to do here all year long which allows a lot of us to outdoor stuff on Sundays, even in the "winter"..... It's just weird, no one really cares about going to watch a local NFL game. I of course have been to tons of games - mainly to watch the Browns, but all of my friends don't even know how to spell NFL much less go to a game. 

    The Rams moving back I could see working - maybe, but moving the Chargers here was mind boggling. I don't care how many people live in the "#2 market", they/we just won't come. In 20 years either the Goats or Bolts, or both, will have been in their new home for several years.

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @d-bone said:

    Lived in the LA 'area' my whole life and couldn't care less about the local teams. In the 70s (I'm 49) I kind of liked the Goats as a kid, but soon fell in love with the Browns. There is just so much to do here all year long which allows a lot of us to outdoor stuff on Sundays, even in the "winter"..... It's just weird, no one really cares about going to watch a local NFL game. I of course have been to tons pf games - mainly to watch the Browns, but all of my friends don't even know how to spell NFL much less go to a game. 

    The Rams moving back I could see working - maybe, but moving the Chargers here was mind boggling. I don't care how many people live in the "#2 market", they/we just won't come. In 20 years either the Goats or Bolts, or both, will have been in their new home for several years.

    I've always thought of LA as being a college market with USC/UCLA.

  • @d-bone said:

    Lived in the LA 'area' my whole life and couldn't care less about the local teams. In the 70s (I'm 49) I kind of liked the Goats as a kid, but soon fell in love with the Browns. There is just so much to do here all year long which allows a lot of us to outdoor stuff on Sundays, even in the "winter"..... It's just weird, no one really cares about going to watch a local NFL game. I of course have been to tons pf games - mainly to watch the Browns, but all of my friends don't even know how to spell NFL much less go to a game. 

    The Rams moving back I could see working - maybe, but moving the Chargers here was mind boggling. I don't care how many people live in the "#2 market", they/we just won't come. In 20 years either the Goats or Bolts, or both, will have been in their new home for several years.

    I've always thought of LA as being a college market with USC/UCLA.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @texasag1969 said:

    I've always thought of LA as being a college market with USC/UCLA.

    It is...considering both SC and UCLA get 80 or 90 thousand plus(maybe more) for all their home games and the Rams aren't even making all the seats available for their home games in the same stadium that nearly fills.