Deshone Kizer
-
No he's NOT!.. Gordon is our best receiver , ding dong... Get the glass dikk out of your mouth!
Hahahaha. Well Coleman played this year... Gordon hasn't played in 2. I'm a big Gordon supporter but please stop making yourself look stupid. You like contradicting yourself? Gordon has been sooo available...
Hahahaha. Well Coleman played this year... Gordon hasn't played in 2. I'm a big Gordon supporter but please stop making yourself look stupid. You like contradicting yourself? Gordon has been sooo available...
The difference is Gordon has honest to god talent.. Coleman is a wannabe who has hands of stone and porcelain for legs.. what part of that can't your pea sized brain understand?
-
Hahahaha. Well Coleman played this year... Gordon hasn't played in 2. I'm a big Gordon supporter but please stop making yourself look stupid. You like contradicting yourself? Gordon has been sooo available...
The difference is Gordon has honest to god talent.. Coleman is a wannabe who has hands of stone and porcelain for legs.. what part of that can't your pea sized brain understand?
The difference is Gordon has honest to god talent.. Coleman is a wannabe who has hands of stone and porcelain for legs.. what part of that can't your pea sized brain understand?
You need to get off Gordon's sack. He's played zero games. Coleman played 1 and played good. Don't be a fool.
-
The difference is Gordon has honest to god talent.. Coleman is a wannabe who has hands of stone and porcelain for legs.. what part of that can't your pea sized brain understand?
You need to get off Gordon's sack. He's played zero games. Coleman played 1 and played good. Don't be a fool.
-
-
I'm not ready to say Coleman sucks. I think he's a guy who has suffered some really bad luck, and he's a guy who also made some poor decisions (being around that felony assault at the apartment complex, missing curfew, etc). On the other hand, I'm not ready to paint him as a good receiver either. I've always said that I don't see Coleman as a true "#1 WR", but I DO believe he's capable of being an extremely productive #2 IF....if...he has a legit #1 playing along side of him. As it stands right now, we're going to see if I'm right because Josh Gordon IS a true #1 WR, and I don't give a crap HOW LONG he's been out. Will he be rusty? Of course. Will it take him some time to get used to playing again? I'm sure. But keep this in mind: Josh was high, drunk, or BOTH when he played for us basically every game of his career (according to him). If he's truly sober now, that HAS to increase his ability level to SOME degree. It will help his memory with the offense, his ability to recover health wise, and his overall stamina.
I've heard some fans ask who would play slot WR for us when we get Josh and Corey back on the field, and the answer is going to shock you. It's not going to be Corey, it's not going to be Higgins, or even Duke or Dreggs. Don't be surprised if Josh Gordon plays a large percentage of snaps as our slot receiver when we go with 3 WR formations. Sound crazy? Yeah, crazy like a fox. If you go back and look at when Norv Turner was our OC, Norv LOVED to use Josh Gordon as the slot WR and he did this because he could somewhat control the matchups. He could get a safety or sometimes a linebacker on Josh, and that's obviously a mismatch 100 times out of 100. Obviously Josh won't play the slot EVERY DOWN, but you will probably see it more than you might think.
Regardless of how long Josh has been out, and that's well documented, he's STILL going to command the opposition's #1 CB, and that means Corey won't face as much pressure. Corey is nowhere near as big as Josh, and if I had to guess, Corey doesn't do too well against larger, physical corners (I could be wrong, haven't see any numbers. Just a guess). Well, Corey won't be facing the big corners when Josh is in the lineup, and I'm excited to see what HE can do when Josh comes back. Hue Jackson said Corey is "100% ready to go", and that's a good sign. I'm somewhat concerned about soft-tissue injuries with him, as that's always been a problem, and he's coming back from a lengthy stint on the IR. But if he CAN stay healthy, I really do believe we'll see some good results. What we really need to figure out is how to get Corey the ball in open spaces. We failed at this last year, and we really didn't do it in the first two games this season either. I can't think of ANY YAC for Corey, and that's just not ok. He excelled at YAC in college, and we have to devise ways to get him in space so he can use his speed and agility. Again, if/when Josh is in the game, I think that might be easier to accomplish.
-
And the D usually keeps the opposing offense down while the O blows the game, but you give them no credit for that and still want to scrap everyone. Be consistent. Hogan should start.
Usually? Indy? Cincy? Houston? How did the defense keep the opposing offense down? Yesterday they didn't either. Thats 4 games out of 9. Hardly usually but hey..dont let the actual score get in the way of your argument.
Usually? Indy? Cincy? Houston? How did the defense keep the opposing offense down? Yesterday they didn't either. Thats 4 games out of 9. Hardly usually but hey..dont let the actual score get in the way of your argument.
You've said repeatedly that it doesn't matter how good the defense is if we're not winning. That was your argument. Period. Whether you think the defense is actually good or not is immaterial to what your point was. So, likewise, it doesn't matter how well Kizer's playing if we're losing. #StartHogan
-
Usually? Indy? Cincy? Houston? How did the defense keep the opposing offense down? Yesterday they didn't either. Thats 4 games out of 9. Hardly usually but hey..dont let the actual score get in the way of your argument.
You've said repeatedly that it doesn't matter how good the defense is if we're not winning. That was your argument. Period. Whether you think the defense is actually good or not is immaterial to what your point was. So, likewise, it doesn't matter how well Kizer's playing if we're losing. #StartHogan
You've said repeatedly that it doesn't matter how good the defense is if we're not winning. That was your argument. Period. Whether you think the defense is actually good or not is immaterial to what your point was. So, likewise, it doesn't matter how well Kizer's playing if we're losing. #StartHogan
Hogan is going to be inactive again this week. So you start hogan clowns should want the coach fired who keeps the best QB not only on the bench but not even active.
-
I'm not the one saying start Hogan lol. You are, by the same logic you apply to the team as a whole. Kizer's winless, so by default the next guy should get a try.
-
I'm not the one saying start Hogan lol. You are, by the same logic you apply to the team as a whole. Kizer's winless, so by default the next guy should get a try.
I'm not the one saying start Hogan lol. You are, by the same logic you apply to the team as a whole. Kizer's winless, so by default the next guy should get a try.
He had a try...he completed more passes it seemed to the other team and guys on the sidelines than he did to his own receivers. No need to see that shit show again.
-
I'm not the one saying start Hogan lol. You are, by the same logic you apply to the team as a whole. Kizer's winless, so by default the next guy should get a try.
He had a try...he completed more passes it seemed to the other team and guys on the sidelines than he did to his own receivers. No need to see that shit show again.
He had a try...he completed more passes it seemed to the other team and guys on the sidelines than he did to his own receivers. No need to see that Sheet show again.
It seems that you see what you want to see.
We've seen the Kizer Sheet show 8 times this year and you're begging for reruns? I can only imagine the grip you'd have on Kizer's nuts if he ever actually won a game!
The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain- -
Jesus, what the hell has happened to this board? You guys are using flame throwers and it is me being the voice of reason?
How about we put this in proper perspective? Corey Coleman has a place on this team. He isn't Julio Jones and he isn't Antonio Brown. However, he is a decent, #2 or #3, nifty type WR who, with a big star on the WR corp can do a lot of damage to opposing defenses. His repeated injuries are a concern, and hopefully it is behind him now.He isn't a trouble maker, he can make some plays and he seems to be a team player.
You can't compare him to Gordon. Not in games played, not in talent. They are simply two different talents. Which is better a Crescent wrench or a Socket wrench? Doesn't matter. Please, stop with this bullschidt of who is better because it is childish. The Browns need to build a better toolbox at WR. Coleman is never gong to be in the HOF, and he is never going to be the stud type player Gordon has shown he can be.
I am interested in the kid getting healthy, and in the Browns getting a Gordon/Jones/Green guy to set the tone and draw the double coverages.
Save me the manure about Coleman being crap.If the guy played for one of the better teams and was healthy, he would contribute nicely, I have no doubt.
The Browns have holes, missing pieces if you will. I am not interested in seeing the team create more holes by abandoning talent simply because that individual is not the consummate answer. Coleman can play, the focus needs to be on adding the missing pieces of the team.
A stud WR
A smash mouth TE
A more aggressive offense (play action deep on 2nd and 1, for instance)
Another guy like Collins
This team does some stuff really well. I am not of the mind to schidtcan all of it.
The Cleveland Browns have the hardest hit players in the NFL -
He had a try...he completed more passes it seemed to the other team and guys on the sidelines than he did to his own receivers. No need to see that Sheet show again.
It seems that you see what you want to see.
We've seen the Kizer Sheet show 8 times this year and you're begging for reruns? I can only imagine the grip you'd have on Kizer's nuts if he ever actually won a game!
It seems that you see what you want to see.
We've seen the Kizer Sheet show 8 times this year and you're begging for reruns? I can only imagine the grip you'd have on Kizer's nuts if he ever actually won a game!
Try to follow along...I've said this several times but I know you youngsters have trouble paying attention these days. 1. Hogan sucks and is once again the 3rd string inactive QB this week. 2. Kizer is the only QB on the roster with the POTENTIAL to be an NFL QB. 3. Show me one time where I've said Kizer is any good? Please...go ahead and search every post I've made. I've been very clear that I think every QB on the roster sucks and we will be drafting one very very early next season.
I'd love to see Kizer continue to improve and be the QB of the future, I'm not convinced he has it in him but I hope he does. Just like I hoped that Hogan wouldn't shit himself when he got the chance to start. You are still the only one here with a hard on for one of the QB's on this time with your constant whining about how great a QB Carl Hogan is. Most everyone here is either totally out on Kizer or at least saying he's the only one who has a chance to be an NFL starting QB.
The Kizer that played on Sunday is a QB that Ben Hogan can only dream of being...he doesn't have any where near that amount of talent in him and that still wasn't good enough to win, although putting up 24 points should be good enough to win a game, he got no help from our defense this week. I hope, because I'm a Browns fan as opposed to someone with a homo crush on a 3rd string QB, that Kizer can keep improving so we don't have to draft another fucking QB in the early rounds this year.
-
Lighten up. Kizer is a kid. I give Hue props for standing up and taking heat. God knows he is already under enough pressure. So, the kid made a bone headed audible. It had no impact on the outcome of the game.
He better not be a kid, kids don't do well against men in sports. Men who own there mistakes have character, men who don't are called kids.
He better not be a kid, kids don't do well against men in sports. Men who own there mistakes have character, men who don't are called kids.
He's a kid. Kid's don't do well in sports? LOL. So why draft youth? Look man, Deshone Kizer didn't have pubic hair when Barack Obama was elected. He's a kid. It is mistakes that help a kid become a man. If the Browns abandon this kid, they will absolutely live to regret it.
-
Jesus, what the hell has happened to this board? You guys are using flame throwers and it is me being the voice of reason?
How about we put this in proper perspective? Corey Coleman has a place on this team. He isn't Julio Jones and he isn't Antonio Brown. However, he is a decent, #2 or #3, nifty type WR who, with a big star on the WR corp can do a lot of damage to opposing defenses. His repeated injuries are a concern, and hopefully it is behind him now.He isn't a trouble maker, he can make some plays and he seems to be a team player.
You can't compare him to Gordon. Not in games played, not in talent. They are simply two different talents. Which is better a Crescent wrench or a Socket wrench? Doesn't matter. Please, stop with this bullschidt of who is better because it is childish. The Browns need to build a better toolbox at WR. Coleman is never gong to be in the HOF, and he is never going to be the stud type player Gordon has shown he can be.
I am interested in the kid getting healthy, and in the Browns getting a Gordon/Jones/Green guy to set the tone and draw the double coverages.
Save me the manure about Coleman being crap.If the guy played for one of the better teams and was healthy, he would contribute nicely, I have no doubt.
The Browns have holes, missing pieces if you will. I am not interested in seeing the team create more holes by abandoning talent simply because that individual is not the consummate answer. Coleman can play, the focus needs to be on adding the missing pieces of the team.
A stud WR
A smash mouth TE
A more aggressive offense (play action deep on 2nd and 1, for instance)
Another guy like Collins
This team does some stuff really well. I am not of the mind to schidtcan all of it.
A more aggressive offense (play action deep on 2nd and 1, for instance)
One decision that I did like that Hue made this past Sunday. It was 3rd and 1 at around our own 40ish and I want to say 1st quarter even based on the direction we were going on the field but I could be wrong. Anyways... 3rd and short...Hue called play action...Kizer held it as long as he could and tried a short pass to the FB (one that even had some touch) and it was incomplete. We went on 4th and Duke made it on the play that Detroit challenged the spot even though the spot was actually shitty in Detroits favor. It was one of the few times that it seemed that Hue was actually thinking ahead and decided we are going for it on 4th and 1 so lets take a shot here and then we can run it and get the 1st down.
I'd like to see him do this more often to your point...but that was at least one example where I think he was being aggressive.
-
He better not be a kid, kids don't do well against men in sports. Men who own there mistakes have character, men who don't are called kids.
He's a kid. Kid's don't do well in sports? LOL. So why draft youth? Look man, Deshone Kizer didn't have pubic hair when Barack Obama was elected. He's a kid. It is mistakes that help a kid become a man. If the Browns abandon this kid, they will absolutely live to regret it.
He's a kid. Kid's don't do well in sports? LOL. So why draft youth? Look man, Deshone Kizer didn't have pubic hair when Barack Obama was elected. He's a kid. It is mistakes that help a kid become a man. If the Browns abandon this kid, they will absolutely live to regret it.
Never said that they should abandon him. Don't get this "love it or leave it mentality". He made a terrible call and needed to face the music but instead he let Hue take the heat,
-
It seems that you see what you want to see.
We've seen the Kizer Sheet show 8 times this year and you're begging for reruns? I can only imagine the grip you'd have on Kizer's nuts if he ever actually won a game!
Try to follow along...I've said this several times but I know you youngsters have trouble paying attention these days. 1. Hogan sucks and is once again the 3rd string inactive QB this week. 2. Kizer is the only QB on the roster with the POTENTIAL to be an NFL QB. 3. Show me one time where I've said Kizer is any good? Please...go ahead and search every post I've made. I've been very clear that I think every QB on the roster sucks and we will be drafting one very very early next season.
I'd love to see Kizer continue to improve and be the QB of the future, I'm not convinced he has it in him but I hope he does. Just like I hoped that Hogan wouldn't shit himself when he got the chance to start. You are still the only one here with a hard on for one of the QB's on this time with your constant whining about how great a QB Carl Hogan is. Most everyone here is either totally out on Kizer or at least saying he's the only one who has a chance to be an NFL starting QB.
The Kizer that played on Sunday is a QB that Ben Hogan can only dream of being...he doesn't have any where near that amount of talent in him and that still wasn't good enough to win, although putting up 24 points should be good enough to win a game, he got no help from our defense this week. I hope, because I'm a Browns fan as opposed to someone with a homo crush on a 3rd string QB, that Kizer can keep improving so we don't have to draft another fucking QB in the early rounds this year.
Try to follow along...I've said this several times but I know you youngsters have trouble paying attention these days. 1. Hogan sucks and is once again the 3rd string inactive QB this week. Hogan doesn't suck and you don't know if he's going to be the #2 or not this Sunday. Nobody does. The "unofficial" depth chart online is just that... unofficial. 2. Kizer is the only QB on the roster with the POTENTIAL to be an NFL QB. That isn't true either. You or I or anybody on here knows how high Hogan's ceiling is. I'd bet 100 dollars that there's been more than 3 other QBs that had a bad game their first start and wound up or will end up in the Hall of Fame. 3. Show me one time where I've said Kizer is any good? Putting Kizer over Hogan- when Hogan has CLEARLY outplayed Kizer makes Hogan our best QB... Please...go ahead and search every post I've made. I've been very clear that I think every QB on the roster sucks and we will be drafting one very very early next season.
-
Hogan hasn't "clearly" outplayed anyone. He's had some nice moments in relief but the list of QB's who look good in relief and then shit themselves when a starter is a very long one. He threw some atrociously bad interceptions against Houston and that horrendous one against Baltimore that changed the momentum before halftime, ...anyone watching that Houston game (but you because you were too busy jerking off that your boyfriend was finally starting a game) saw that he doesn't have the arm strength to make the throws. He's Colt McCoy..nice long career as a backup/3rd string guy. Great work if you can get it. Good for him. The fact that he's got one fan who thinks he's the greatest QB since Brady should make him happy.
-
Hogan hasn't "clearly" outplayed anyone. He's had some nice moments in relief but the list of QB's who look good in relief and then shit themselves when a starter is a very long one. He threw some atrociously bad interceptions against Houston and that horrendous one against Baltimore that changed the momentum before halftime, ...anyone watching that Houston game (but you because you were too busy jerking off that your boyfriend was finally starting a game) saw that he doesn't have the arm strength to make the throws. He's Colt McCoy..nice long career as a backup/3rd string guy. Great work if you can get it. Good for him. The fact that he's got one fan who thinks he's the greatest QB since Brady should make him happy.
Hogan hasn't "clearly" outplayed anyone. He's had some nice moments in relief but the list of QB's who look good in relief and then Sheet themselves when a starter is a very long one. He threw some atrociously bad interceptions against Houston and that horrendous one against Baltimore that changed the momentum before halftime, ...anyone watching that Houston game (but you because you were too busy jerking off that your boyfriend was finally starting a game) saw that he doesn't have the arm strength to make the throws. He's Colt McCoy..nice long career as a backup/3rd string guy. Great work if you can get it. Good for him. The fact that he's got one fan who thinks he's the greatest QB since Brady should make him happy.
The Browns haven't had a young QB look like he belonged on an NFL roster since Derek Anderson in 2007.
-
Hogan hasn't "clearly" outplayed anyone. He's had some nice moments in relief but the list of QB's who look good in relief and then Sheet themselves when a starter is a very long one. He threw some atrociously bad interceptions against Houston and that horrendous one against Baltimore that changed the momentum before halftime, ...anyone watching that Houston game (but you because you were too busy jerking off that your boyfriend was finally starting a game) saw that he doesn't have the arm strength to make the throws. He's Colt McCoy..nice long career as a backup/3rd string guy. Great work if you can get it. Good for him. The fact that he's got one fan who thinks he's the greatest QB since Brady should make him happy.
The Browns haven't had a young QB look like he belonged on an NFL roster since Derek Anderson in 2007.
The Browns have had a young QB look like he belonged on an NFL roster since Derek Anderson in 2007.
I've guessing you're saying haven't had....Shockingly of all the QB's on that "jersey", I think McCoy and Anderson are the only two who lasted for very long in the NFL after starting in Cleveland.
Kizer might be that guy...he's got a lot of growing to do but he has the tools. Ok game against Minnesota (and a good defense too) and better game on the road against Detroit. This week will be a real test for him.
-
The Browns have had a young QB look like he belonged on an NFL roster since Derek Anderson in 2007.
I've guessing you're saying haven't had....Shockingly of all the QB's on that "jersey", I think McCoy and Anderson are the only two who lasted for very long in the NFL after starting in Cleveland.
Kizer might be that guy...he's got a lot of growing to do but he has the tools. Ok game against Minnesota (and a good defense too) and better game on the road against Detroit. This week will be a real test for him.
I've guessing you're saying haven't had....Shockingly of all the QB's on that "jersey", I think McCoy and Anderson are the only two who lasted for very long in the NFL after starting in Cleveland.
Kizer might be that guy...he's got a lot of growing to do but he has the tools. Ok game against Minnesota (and a good defense too) and better game on the road against Detroit. This week will be a real test for him.
Yep sorry. The jury is still out on Kizer for me. I haven't see a full half yet where I was blown away. There were games where Anderson stood in the pocket like an NFL QB and picked teams apart.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login