Clemson, Oklahoma, Georgia and Alabama picked for College Playoff
-
I'll give you the FCS thing. But the 9-game schedule is irrelevant.
-
I'll give you the FCS thing. But the 9-game schedule is irrelevant.
Point is that the is what the other conferences are all doing. But instead of the extra conference games...the SEC has another donut. If they were taking that extra game and scheduling against a P5 opponent....that would be one thing....but they are not.
-
The SEC isn't the only league with an 8-game conference schedule.
-
I’ll just leave this here. . .
Power 5 Bowl standings after today:
@B1Gfootball 5-0
@Big12Conference 4-2
@ACCFootball 4-3
@pac12 1-7
@SEC 0-3 -
B1G making a statement.
4-0 PAC 12
1-0 SEC
2-0 ACC
Have beaten 4 current top 20 teams including 3 in the top 11.Not bad at all.
-
If we just all agree that the Big 12 should be banned from the playoff then Ohio State could have had that spot today. They're a joke. OU is head and shoulders better than anyone else in the Big 12 and they lost. Meanwhile, the SEC has 2 other teams this year on par with its champion (stupid games against UCF notwithstanding). Big 10 had a solid group of teams at the top too. Really solid. The Big 12 sucks.
-
Just expand the playoffs to 8. Include the winners of the 5 P5 conferences, plus 3 wildcards. Then it would be fair to have more than 1 team in from 1 conference...plus you could include an outlier like Central Florida...and see how they could really matchup.
It is so absurdly simple....and will happen. Just when?
-
Just expand the playoffs to 8. Include the winners of the 5 P5 conferences, plus 3 wildcards. Then it would be fair to have more than 1 team in from 1 conference...plus you could include an outlier like Central Florida...and see how they could really matchup.
It is so absurdly simple....and will happen. Just when?
Just expand the playoffs to 8. Include the winners of the 5 P5 conferences, plus 3 wildcards. Then it would be fair to have more than 1 team in from 1 conference...plus you could include an outlier like Central Florida...and see how they could really matchup.
It is so absurdly simple....and will happen. Just when?
It would be so easy to do and is being called for by more media outlets, from SB Nation:
Here’s what an eight-team playoff might look like in 2017, if all the conference title game favorites win this coming weekend:
- 8 UCF (G5 rep) at 1 Clemson (ACC champ)
- 5 Ohio State (Big Ten champ) at 4 Alabama (at-large)
- 6 USC (Pac-12 champ) at 3 Auburn (SEC champ)
- 7 Wisconsin (at-large) at 2 Oklahoma (Big 12 champ)
You could make a case for including Penn State or even a two-loss Georgia over Wisconsin, but we’ll go with this.
-
Should be 16 to rival Match Madness.
-
Should be 16 to rival Match Madness.
Yes instead of 40 bowl games with 20-30 basically not that interesting and half empty make some the early round playoff games like the Sweet 16......and every other brand of football from the pros down to high school.
A no brainer!
-
Just expand the playoffs to 8. Include the winners of the 5 P5 conferences, plus 3 wildcards. Then it would be fair to have more than 1 team in from 1 conference...plus you could include an outlier like Central Florida...and see how they could really matchup.
It is so absurdly simple....and will happen. Just when?
It would be so easy to do and is being called for by more media outlets, from SB Nation:
Here’s what an eight-team playoff might look like in 2017, if all the conference title game favorites win this coming weekend:
- 8 UCF (G5 rep) at 1 Clemson (ACC champ)
- 5 Ohio State (Big Ten champ) at 4 Alabama (at-large)
- 6 USC (Pac-12 champ) at 3 Auburn (SEC champ)
- 7 Wisconsin (at-large) at 2 Oklahoma (Big 12 champ)
You could make a case for including Penn State or even a two-loss Georgia over Wisconsin, but we’ll go with this.
It would be so easy to do and is being called for by more media outlets, from SB Nation:
Here’s what an eight-team playoff might look like in 2017, if all the conference title game favorites win this coming weekend:
- 8 UCF (G5 rep) at 1 Clemson (ACC champ)
- 5 Ohio State (Big Ten champ) at 4 Alabama (at-large)
- 6 USC (Pac-12 champ) at 3 Auburn (SEC champ)
- 7 Wisconsin (at-large) at 2 Oklahoma (Big 12 champ)
You could make a case for including Penn State or even a two-loss Georgia over Wisconsin, but we’ll go with this.
Considering that Georgia was SEC champ...I think you may revise this.
And NO...no home games. Continue to use the neutral site bowl games for these first rounds. They are useless anyway...so incorporate them into this.
-
It would be so easy to do and is being called for by more media outlets, from SB Nation:
Here’s what an eight-team playoff might look like in 2017, if all the conference title game favorites win this coming weekend:
- 8 UCF (G5 rep) at 1 Clemson (ACC champ)
- 5 Ohio State (Big Ten champ) at 4 Alabama (at-large)
- 6 USC (Pac-12 champ) at 3 Auburn (SEC champ)
- 7 Wisconsin (at-large) at 2 Oklahoma (Big 12 champ)
You could make a case for including Penn State or even a two-loss Georgia over Wisconsin, but we’ll go with this.
Considering that Georgia was SEC champ...I think you may revise this.
And NO...no home games. Continue to use the neutral site bowl games for these first rounds. They are useless anyway...so incorporate them into this.
Considering that Georgia was SEC champ...I think you may revise this.
And NO...no home games. Continue to use the neutral site bowl games for these first rounds. They are useless anyway...so incorporate them into this.
That was just a convenient example I found from SB. And the "at" designation can be the home team even at neutral sites.....which is preferred. Ironically the national championship game will be in ALABAMA this year vs Georgia.
-
Considering that Georgia was SEC champ...I think you may revise this.
And NO...no home games. Continue to use the neutral site bowl games for these first rounds. They are useless anyway...so incorporate them into this.
That was just a convenient example I found from SB. And the "at" designation can be the home team even at neutral sites.....which is preferred. Ironically the national championship game will be in ALABAMA this year vs Georgia.
That was just a convenient example I found from SB. And the "at" designation can be the home team even at neutral sites.....which is preferred. Ironically the national championship game will be in ALABAMA this year vs Georgia.
Actually...it will be in Georgia...in Atlanta, vs. Alabama. Are you getting dyslexic?
-
That was just a convenient example I found from SB. And the "at" designation can be the home team even at neutral sites.....which is preferred. Ironically the national championship game will be in ALABAMA this year vs Georgia.
Actually...it will be in Georgia...in Atlanta, vs. Alabama. Are you getting dyslexic?
Actually...it will be in Georgia...in Atlanta, vs. Alabama. Are you getting dyslexic?
D'OH, I only heard it 100 times, good Georgia will have a better shot.......maybe. Maybe not. And no I'm definitely not dlyselxic.
-
Bama's going to blow them out. Bet the farm on the Tide.
-
THE NCAA D-1AA and D-1AA CHAMPIONSHIP GAMES.....from vegasinsider.com
NCAA FOOTBALL SPREAD 
01/06 12:00 PM
367 North Dakota State
368 James Madison
-4½ -10
48u-10
-4 -10
48u-10
-4 -10
47u-10
-3½ -10
46½u-10
-4 -10
47u-10
-4 -10
46½u-10
-4 -10
47u-10
-4 -10
47½u-10
-4 -10
48o-12Picks TV: ESPN2, DTV: 209 01/08 8:10 PM
151 Alabama
152 Georgia
-4½ -10
47u-10
-4 -10
44½u-10
-4 -10
44½u-10
-4 -10
44½u-10
-4 -10
44½u-10
-3½ -10
44½u-10
-3½ -15
44½u-10
-3½ -10
44½u-10
-3½ -14
44u-10P AS YOU SEE BOTH ND ST and ALA are currently the consensus -4 favorites. Both opened as -4 1/2 point favorites.
ALA is only a -3 1/2 point favorite at a few books shown here.
-
Bama's going to blow them out. Bet the farm on the Tide.
How about we just bet your house on it....since you are so confident.

-
I'm poor though.
-
Wrong on the blowout. Still got the win.
-
Wrong on the blowout. Still got the win.
One blown coverage from the win for Ga. As my son said that safety was not responsible for the other side of the field and should never have been pulled over by the QBs eyes. He ended up not being in position to pick up his responsibility on the deep R side of the D. Safety 101 class for dummies.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login