QB Sneak = 2001-2016
-
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21158057/the-dying-art-qb-sneak
...this is with 2 yards or less for the 1st down. (the lousiest team was 70%)
Short-Yardage Conversion Rate
TEAM OTHER PLAYS (%) SNEAKS (%) NE 64.4 90.6 NYJ 61.2 89.9 TB 56.8 88.1 MIA 60.9 87.5 JAC 57.8 87.3 SD/LA 63.9 87.0 NO 63.5 86.7 DEN 60.8 86.2 CIN 59.5 85.4 PIT 60.3 85.0 CLE 59.6 84.9 PHI 62.1 84.7 NYG 61.2 84.4 BAL 57.2 84.3 OAK 59.5 84.1 MIN 63.7 82.5 SF 57.9 82.3 BUF 56.8 81.0 CHI 58.0 80.6 HOU 61.3 79.7 ATL 60.2 78.6 CAR 62.2 78.4 TEN 58.2 77.1 GB 61.0 76.9 IND 63.5 76.7 STL/LA 58.7 76.7 SEA 61.4 75.8 ARI 60.4 75.0 WAS 60.0 72.7 DET 57.7 72.7 KC 61.4 71.4 DAL 61.4 70.0 -
I've seen different numbers around 80% plus successful attempts yet some teams do deep handoffs or run laterally versus the really fast DL or LBs.
Sure you have to weigh your team's strenghts and weaknesses plus your quarterback's health issues -and- gauge your opponents but sometimes why screw around? Line up quick and go.
-
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21158057/the-dying-art-qb-sneak
...this is with 2 yards or less for the 1st down. (the lousiest team was 70%)
Short-Yardage Conversion Rate
TEAM OTHER PLAYS (%) SNEAKS (%) NE 64.4 90.6 NYJ 61.2 89.9 TB 56.8 88.1 MIA 60.9 87.5 JAC 57.8 87.3 SD/LA 63.9 87.0 NO 63.5 86.7 DEN 60.8 86.2 CIN 59.5 85.4 PIT 60.3 85.0 CLE 59.6 84.9 PHI 62.1 84.7 NYG 61.2 84.4 BAL 57.2 84.3 OAK 59.5 84.1 MIN 63.7 82.5 SF 57.9 82.3 BUF 56.8 81.0 CHI 58.0 80.6 HOU 61.3 79.7 ATL 60.2 78.6 CAR 62.2 78.4 TEN 58.2 77.1 GB 61.0 76.9 IND 63.5 76.7 STL/LA 58.7 76.7 SEA 61.4 75.8 ARI 60.4 75.0 WAS 60.0 72.7 DET 57.7 72.7 KC 61.4 71.4 DAL 61.4 70.0 http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21158057/the-dying-art-qb-sneak
...this is with 2 yards or less for the 1st down. (the lousiest team was 70%)
Short-Yardage Conversion
SEA 61.4 75.8 ARI 60.4 75.0 WAS 60.0 72.7 DET 57.7 72.7 KC 61.4 71.4 DAL 61.4 70.0 <---- they have Elliot, a good plan B -
^^ that’s what I figured. But I felt like it was a trap and didn’t respond.
After thinking about it more, a play action bootleg type of play on 3rd and 2 would've been an appropriate call
-
-
Wow, just wow.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
