Skip to content

WEEK 7 - TOP 25 RANKINGS, TV SCHEDULE, MISC. GOSSIP and other key stuff.......

College Football Forum
27 4 766
  • 6 team. Byes for top two seeds

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @mld-woody said:

    6 team. Byes for top two seeds

    No 8 minimum. 16 would be better 

  • AxeA Axe

    @mjp28 said:

    SOS can be misleading because most all just play each other, once they get well into the schedules around weeks 8, 9, 10 the true SOS emerges.

    Agreed, but at this point in the season it's all we have to attempt to gauge the situation and based upon that, making a "cupcake" statement is ludicrous.

    7 teams and #1 gets a bye or 8 teams, no byes...

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @axe said:

    Agreed, but at this point in the season it's all we have to attempt to gauge the situation and based upon that, making a "cupcake" statement is ludicrous.

    7 teams and #1 gets a bye or 8 teams, no byes...

    Hey I agree with the Axe we might be on to something.......except the cupcake part, it's true if you look at the SEC non-conference games really now 

    Alabama on NOV 17 (SAT) TBA VS THE CITADEL 
     
    Are you kidding me? The Girl Scouts were already booked?  😆
    But on the playoffs I'd be happy to start with an 8 team playoff 1/8 2/7, 3/6, 4/5 would give you some excellent games especially 4/5. And NO BYES.
  • @axe said:

    Agreed, but at this point in the season it's all we have to attempt to gauge the situation and based upon that, making a "cupcake" statement is ludicrous.

    7 teams and #1 gets a bye or 8 teams, no byes...

    Hey I agree with the Axe we might be on to something.......except the cupcake part, it's true if you look at the SEC non-conference games really now 

    Alabama on NOV 17 (SAT) TBA VS THE CITADEL 
     
    Are you kidding me? The Girl Scouts were already booked?  😆
    But on the playoffs I'd be happy to start with an 8 team playoff 1/8 2/7, 3/6, 4/5 would give you some excellent games especially 4/5. And NO BYES.
    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @mjp28 said:

    Hey I agree with the Axe we might be on to something.......except the cupcake part, it's true if you look at the SEC non-conference games really now 

    Alabama on NOV 17 (SAT) TBA VS THE CITADEL 
     
    Are you kidding me? The Girl Scouts were already booked?  😆
    But on the playoffs I'd be happy to start with an 8 team playoff 1/8 2/7, 3/6, 4/5 would give you some excellent games especially 4/5. And NO BYES.
     

    East Germany are such a bunch of gutless wonders for scheduling like that.

  • @axe said:

    Agreed, but at this point in the season it's all we have to attempt to gauge the situation and based upon that, making a "cupcake" statement is ludicrous.

    7 teams and #1 gets a bye or 8 teams, no byes...

    Hey I agree with the Axe we might be on to something.......except the cupcake part, it's true if you look at the SEC non-conference games really now 

    Alabama on NOV 17 (SAT) TBA VS THE CITADEL 
     
    Are you kidding me? The Girl Scouts were already booked?  😆
    But on the playoffs I'd be happy to start with an 8 team playoff 1/8 2/7, 3/6, 4/5 would give you some excellent games especially 4/5. And NO BYES.
    AxeA Axe wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @mjp28 said:

    Hey I agree with the Axe we might be on to something.......except the cupcake part, it's true if you look at the SEC non-conference games really now 

    Alabama on NOV 17 (SAT) TBA VS THE CITADEL 
     
    Are you kidding me? The Girl Scouts were already booked?  😆
     
     

    Could've been worse.. Bama could have scheduled someone from the Big10.. 😁

  • AxeA Axe

    @mjp28 said:

    Hey I agree with the Axe we might be on to something.......except the cupcake part, it's true if you look at the SEC non-conference games really now 

    Alabama on NOV 17 (SAT) TBA VS THE CITADEL 
     
    Are you kidding me? The Girl Scouts were already booked?  😆
     
     

    Could've been worse.. Bama could have scheduled someone from the Big10.. 😁

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @axe said:

    Could've been worse.. Bama could have scheduled someone from the Big10.. 😁

    Worse  for them sure for them sure

  • AxeA Axe

    @mjp28 said:

    Hey I agree with the Axe we might be on to something.......except the cupcake part, it's true if you look at the SEC non-conference games really now 

    Alabama on NOV 17 (SAT) TBA VS THE CITADEL 
     
    Are you kidding me? The Girl Scouts were already booked?  😆
     
     

    Could've been worse.. Bama could have scheduled someone from the Big10.. 😁

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @axe said:

    Could've been worse.. Bama could have scheduled someone from the Big10.. 😁

    I'm sure you're just kidding us you know The Citadel is a fine school in the D-1AA (FCS) division a bit different than the D-1A schools in the BIG TEN.

    The Citadel Bulldogs football program represents The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina in the NCAA Division I Football Championship Subdivision (FCS). The Bulldogs play in the Southern Conference, as they have since 1936. 

    Other SEC schools also play schools from the D-1AA ranks some from this very conference.......except for getting all the icing and powdered sugar off of their uniforms it "probably" is a rousing game of football. 😉

  • @axe said:

    Could've been worse.. Bama could have scheduled someone from the Big10.. 😁

    I'm sure you're just kidding us you know The Citadel is a fine school in the D-1AA (FCS) division a bit different than the D-1A schools in the BIG TEN.

    The Citadel Bulldogs football program represents The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina in the NCAA Division I Football Championship Subdivision (FCS). The Bulldogs play in the Southern Conference, as they have since 1936. 

    Other SEC schools also play schools from the D-1AA ranks some from this very conference.......except for getting all the icing and powdered sugar off of their uniforms it "probably" is a rousing game of football. 😉

    AxeA Axe wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @mjp28 said:

    I'm sure you're just kidding us

    Of course I am but I will say this, last yr the SEC was down..  Wait, who played for the national championship  again?

  • AxeA Axe

    @mjp28 said:

    I'm sure you're just kidding us

    Of course I am but I will say this, last yr the SEC was down..  Wait, who played for the national championship  again?

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28
    #23

    @axe said:

    Of course I am but I will say this, last yr the SEC was down..  Wait, who played for the national championship  again?

    Well there's no doubt the top football factory schools along with the US population has moved down south over the past 30 plus years.

    Nick Saban from WV and a Kent State grad took all of his northern roots including stays with the BUCKEYES and BROWNS and ended up at the current #1 football factory Alabama. OHIO STATE also has a nice football factory too. 

    But we fans seem to love it regardless of the details.

  • AxeA Axe wrote on last edited by
    #24

    I'm just happy to see a degree of parity between conferences..  I much prefer college ball to the NFL..

  • AxeA Axe

    I'm just happy to see a degree of parity between conferences..  I much prefer college ball to the NFL..

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #25

    @axe said:

    I'm just happy to see a degree of parity between conferences..  I much prefer college ball to the NFL..

    Yes I've preferred NCAA football and of course the March Madness in hoops for a long while now. It's 1. NCAA football 2. NFL football 3. MLB for me.

    Oh another strange but true story that little sawed off 5' 6" Nick Saban was a DB at KSU the same time I was at YSU.

  • AxeA Axe wrote on last edited by
    #26

    USF dodged a bullet tonight.. 😊

  • AxeA Axe

    @mjp28 said:

    I'm sure you're just kidding us

    Of course I am but I will say this, last yr the SEC was down..  Wait, who played for the national championship  again?

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @axe said:

    Of course I am but I will say this, last yr the SEC was down..  Wait, who played for the national championship  again?

    East GermanyEast Germany