Skip to content

If the playoff started today Dec. 12

The Browns Board
18 8 363
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #1

    AFC

    NFC

    DIVISIONAL ROUND

    JAN 12-13

    APR.png

    Lowest Winning Seed From AFC Wild Card Round

    KC.png

    Chiefs [x]

    (11-2-0) Proj: 1st Seed

    APR.png

    Highest Winning Seed From AFC Wild Card Round

    NE.png

    Patriots 

    (9-4-0) Proj: 2nd Seed

    NPR.png

    Lowest Winning Seed From NFC Wild Card Round

    NO.png

    Saints [xy]

    (11-2-0) Proj: 1st Seed

    NPR.png

    Highest Winning Seed From NFC Wild Card Round

    LA.png

    Rams [xy]

    (11-2-0) Proj: 2nd Seed

     

    AFC

    NFC

    WILD CARD ROUND

    JAN 5-6

    BAL.png

    Ravens 

    (7-6-0) Proj: 6th Seed

    HOU.png

    Texans 

    (9-4-0) Proj: 3rd Seed

    LAC.png

    Chargers 

    (10-3-0) Proj: 5th Seed

    PIT.png

    Steelers 

    (7-5-1) Proj: 4th Seed

    MIN.png

    Vikings 

    (6-6-1) Proj: 6th Seed

    CHI.png

    Bears 

    (9-4-0) Proj: 3rd Seed

    SEA.png

    Seahawks 

    (8-5-0) Proj: 5th Seed

    DAL.png

    Cowboys 

    (8-5-0) Proj: 4th Seed

     

    IN THE HUNT

    Tiebreaking Procedures
     
     
    • AFC
    • IND.png

      Colts 

      (7-6-0) Proj: 7th Seed

    • MIA.png

      Dolphins 

      (7-6-0) Proj: 8th Seed

    • TEN.png

      Titans 

      (7-6-0) Proj: 9th Seed

    • DEN.png

      Broncos 

      (6-7-0) Proj: 10th Seed

    • CLE.png

      Browns 

      (5-7-1) Proj: 11th Seed

    • CIN.png

      Bengals 

      (5-8-0) Proj: 12th Seed

    • NFC
    • CAR.png

      Panthers 

      (6-7-0) Proj: 7th Seed

    • PHI.png

      Eagles 

      (6-7-0) Proj: 8th Seed

    • WAS.png

      Redskins 

      (6-7-0) Proj: 9th Seed

    • GB.png

      Packers 

      (5-7-1) Proj: 10th Seed

    • TB.png

      Buccaneers 

      (5-8-0) Proj: 11th Seed

    • NYG.png

      Giants 

      (5-8-0) Proj: 12th Seed

    • DET.png

      Lions 

      (5-8-0) Proj: 13th Seed

    • ATL.png

      Falcons 

      (4-9-0) Proj: 14th Seed

     
     

     

     

    NFL PLAYOFFS STANDINGS

    AFC

    Division Leaders W L T DIV CONF
    [x] Chiefs 11 2 0 4-0 9-1
    Patriots 9 4 0 3-1 6-3
    Texans 9 4 0 3-2 7-3
    Steelers 7 5 1 3-1-1 4-5-1
    Wild Card W L T DIV CONF
    Chargers 10 3 0 2-2 7-2
    Ravens 7 6 0 2-3 6-4
    In The Hunt W L T DIV CONF
    Colts 7 6 0 3-2 6-5
    Dolphins 7 6 0 4-1 6-4
    Titans 7 6 0 3-2 5-6
    Broncos 6 7 0 2-2 4-5
    Browns 5 7 1 2-1-1 3-5-1
    Bengals 5 8 0 1-3 3-6
    Eliminated W L T DIV CONF
    Bills 4 9 0 1-3 3-7
    Jaguars 4 9 0 1-4 3-7
    Jets 4 9 0 1-4 3-7
    Raiders 3 10 0 0-4 2-7

    NFC

    Division Leaders W L T DIV CONF
    [xy] Saints 11 2 0 3-1 8-2
    [xy] Rams 11 2 0 4-0 7-2
    Bears 9 4 0 3-1 7-2
    Cowboys 8 5 0 4-1 7-3
    Wild Card W L T DIV CONF
    Seahawks 8 5 0 2-2 7-3
    Vikings 6 6 1 2-1-1 5-4-1
    In The Hunt W L T DIV CONF
    Panthers 6 7 0 1-2 4-5
    Eagles 6 7 0 3-2 4-6
    Redskins 6 7 0 2-3 6-5
    Packers 5 7 1 1-2-1 3-6-1
    Buccaneers 5 8 0 2-3 4-6
    Giants 5 8 0 1-4 4-7
    Lions 5 8 0 1-3 3-7
    Falcons 4 9 0 2-2 4-5
    Eliminated W L T DIV CONF
    Cardinals 3 10 0 2-2 3-6
    49ers 3 10 0 0-4 1-8
    • [*] Clinched Homefield Advantage in Playoffs
    • [y] Clinched Division Title
    • [z] Clinched First-Round Bye
    • [x] Clinched Playoff Berth
     

    The next object is an advertisement

     
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
    #2

    Also....if the season ended today, the NFL draft order would be as follows:

    1. 49ers

    2. Cardinals

    3. Raiders

    4. Jets

    5. Falcons

    6. Bills

    7. Jags

    8. Giants

    9. Bucs

    10. Lions

    11. Bengals 

    12. Packers

    13. Browns

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000998702/article/2019-nfl-draft-order-team-needs-49ers-no-1-eagles-in-top-16

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Critical games between playoff teams this week:

    Thursday:   Kansas City vs.  LA Chargers.....for supremacy in the AFCW....and maybe even the entire AFC.

    Dallas vs. Colts

    Patriots at Pittsburgh.

    Bottom of the barrel games (struggle for high draft pick)

    Arizona vs. Atlanta

    Oakland vs. Cincinnati

  • mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Weeks ago this was so hypothetical and of little to no interest for BROWNS fans.......not exactly true now. 😉

    Nice to be still in it.

  • hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by hoorta
    #5

    And since Gipper asked- I don't understand how the Dolphins are currently behind the Colts...   'Fins 6-4, Colts 6-5, even their Division record is better.   

    Three or more teams...   

    1. Apply division tie breaker to eliminate all but the highest ranked club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. The original seeding within a division upon application of the division tie breaker remains the same for all subsequent applications of the procedure that are necessary to identify the two Wild-Card participants.
    2. Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.)
    3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
    4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
    5. Strength of victory.
    6. Strength of schedule.
    7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
  • Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
    #6

    Colts beat the Dolphins.

    Z

  • Colts beat the Dolphins.

    Z

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Zombo said:

    Colts beat the Dolphins.

    Z

    That would do it in a two team confrontation....but what about when there are 4-5 teams in the mix?  I thought something else applied.

  • PoeticGP PoeticG wrote on last edited by
    #8

    We can catch the Ravens.

  • Zombo said:

    Colts beat the Dolphins.

    Z

    That would do it in a two team confrontation....but what about when there are 4-5 teams in the mix?  I thought something else applied.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by hoorta
    #9

    @the-gipper said:

    That would do it in a two team confrontation....but what about when there are 4-5 teams in the mix?  I thought something else applied.

    Yeah Gipper- I posted the above when it's a three or more way tie. If it involves two teams in the same division, the division tiebreaker applies first.  Next, a team gets the nod if they've beaten all of the others, or eliminated if they've lost to all the others. 

    Colts don't play the Ravens, though they did beat both the Titans and 'Fins.  It will sort itself out in the next couple weeks. NFL.com will probably start posting the what ifs and whys the next to last week.  🙂  

  • AxeA Axe wrote on last edited by
    #10

    48367885_2002142873205795_45871826974277

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #11

    It looks like the Chargers have taken over the number one seed in the AFC tonight with their last minute crazy win over the Chiefs

  • It looks like the Chargers have taken over the number one seed in the AFC tonight with their last minute crazy win over the Chiefs

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @the-gipper said:

    It looks like the Chargers have taken over the number one seed in the AFC tonight with their last minute crazy win over the Chiefs

    Not yet...the Chiefs still have the tiebreaker at this point.  

  • @the-gipper said:

    It looks like the Chargers have taken over the number one seed in the AFC tonight with their last minute crazy win over the Chiefs

    Not yet...the Chiefs still have the tiebreaker at this point.  

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @mark-o said:

    Not yet...the Chiefs still have the tiebreaker at this point.  

    Oh based on what?

  • @the-gipper said:

    It looks like the Chargers have taken over the number one seed in the AFC tonight with their last minute crazy win over the Chiefs

    Not yet...the Chiefs still have the tiebreaker at this point.  

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @mark-o said:

    Not yet...the Chiefs still have the tiebreaker at this point.  

    No they don't. They split. 

    @the-gipper said:

    Oh based on what?

    Chiefs have better division record.   4-1 to 3-2.

  • C crstphr2 wrote on last edited by
    #15

    AFC tiebreakers:

    • Kansas City is ahead of the L.A. Chargers in the AFC West based on division record (4-1 to the Chargers' 3-2).
    • New England is ahead of Houston based on head to head (1-0).
    • Indianapolis is ahead of Tennessee in the AFC South based on head to head (1-0).
    • Baltimore and Miami are ahead of Indianapolis based on conference record (Ravens' and Dolphins' 6-4 to the Colts' 6-5).
    • Baltimore is ahead of Miami based on common games record (4-1 to the Dolphins' 3-1).
    • Indianapolis is ahead of Miami based on head to head (1-0).
    • Miami is ahead of Tennessee based on head to head (1-0).
    • Buffalo is ahead of the N.Y. Jets in the AFC East based on division record (1-3 to the Jets' 1-4).
    • Buffalo is ahead of Jacksonville based on head to head (1-0).
    • Jacksonville is ahead of the N.Y. Jets based on head to head (1-0).
  • @mark-o said:

    Not yet...the Chiefs still have the tiebreaker at this point.  

    No they don't. They split. 

    @the-gipper said:

    Oh based on what?

    Chiefs have better division record.   4-1 to 3-2.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @hoorta said:

    No they don't. They split. 

    Chiefs have better division record.   4-1 to 3-2.

    So the Chiefs still have the tiebreaker advantage and still hold the #1 seed in the AFC.  Just like I said.   🙂 

  • @hoorta said:

    No they don't. They split. 

    Chiefs have better division record.   4-1 to 3-2.

    So the Chiefs still have the tiebreaker advantage and still hold the #1 seed in the AFC.  Just like I said.   🙂 

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @mark-o said:

    So the Chiefs still have the tiebreaker advantage and still hold the #1 seed in the AFC.  Just like I said.   🙂 

    Sorry Mark, getting old and confused. They need to change who gets to host a playoff game. Chiefs\ Chargers could go 13-3 and have to play a road game against a Steelers team, or LOL the Browns who were 8-7-1.

  • @mark-o said:

    So the Chiefs still have the tiebreaker advantage and still hold the #1 seed in the AFC.  Just like I said.   🙂 

    Sorry Mark, getting old and confused. They need to change who gets to host a playoff game. Chiefs\ Chargers could go 13-3 and have to play a road game against a Steelers team, or LOL the Browns who were 8-7-1.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @hoorta said:

    Sorry Mark, getting old and confused. They need to change who gets to host a playoff game. Chiefs\ Chargers could go 13-3 and have to play a road game against a Steelers team, or LOL the Browns who were 8-7-1.

    I agree.   The Chargers or Chiefs will have to play their first playoff game on the road and thats crazy.   Probably better for the Chargers.  They play 16 road games anyways so it won't be a big deal for them.   Probably a better view for the league as well then having the Chargers hosting the AFC championship game in front of 25,000 fans, most dressed in opposing teams jerseys.