Skip to content

Jarvis Landry headed to pro bowl

The Browns Board
106 24 2.4k 1
  • @tacosman said:

    ummm....it's a stupid comparison.  Edelman catches a higher percentages of balls(at least last year), so his yp target(the more meaningful stat) is higher.....

    also,  while you're at it- look up edelman's contract.  Then look up landry's....now thats the gavel slam.

    Who really fucking cares.. Landry is our guy.. I'm ok with that.

    chocoC choco wrote on last edited by

    @nickers said:

    Who really fucking cares.. Landry is our guy.. I'm ok with that.

    Nah...he's right...

    Landry sucks because someone else has a couple better stats...cause that's all that matters, entire picture. It's their money afterall...

  • @nickers said:

    Who really fucking cares.. Landry is our guy.. I'm ok with that.

    Nah...he's right...

    Landry sucks because someone else has a couple better stats...cause that's all that matters, entire picture. It's their money afterall...

    nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by

    @choco said:

    Nah...he's right...

    Landry sucks because someone else has a couple better stats...cause that's all that matters, entire picture. It's their money afterall...

    There's no right or wrong here.. Landry is productive for us.. End of story..

  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by

    So I just looked at Landry's statistical season...and for almost half the games he caught 50% or less of his targets.  Now that seems sub par.  But you have to consider that at some point the QB HAS TO throw the ball.  (or run, throw it away or eat it)  So who would you pick to throw the ball at, such that only he could get it, not the defender, but it's going to take an incredible effort and catch?  You'd probably go with Landry.  Especially early on,  when Njoku was dropping passes.  -  And Landry came through with some circus catches.

    Landry was on the field for us all season...contributing every week...even when he was dinged and thought that he might not be active for Sunday.  Might as well say he had five 100 yard games (4 acutally, one was 97 yards).    With all of the young, unproven receivers he was surrounded with, he had a pro bowl type year.

  • @nickers said:

    Probably a good time to close this thread after that final statement.. I took it as a gavel slam.. (No offense Gip) LOL

    ummm....it's a stupid comparison.  Edelman catches a higher percentages of balls(at least last year), so his yp target(the more meaningful stat) is higher.....

    also,  while you're at it- look up edelman's contract.  Then look up landry's....now thats the gavel slam.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by

    @tacosman said:

    ummm....it's a stupid comparison.  Edelman catches a higher percentages of balls(at least last year), so his yp target(the more meaningful stat) is higher.....

    also,  while you're at it- look up edelman's contract.  Then look up landry's....now thats the gavel slam.

    Haters gonna hate...  

  • @tacosman said:

    ummm....it's a stupid comparison.  Edelman catches a higher percentages of balls(at least last year), so his yp target(the more meaningful stat) is higher.....

    also,  while you're at it- look up edelman's contract.  Then look up landry's....now thats the gavel slam.

    Haters gonna hate...  

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    @hoorta said:

    Haters gonna hate...  

    Exactly.... 

  • U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by Unsympathetic

    Browns WR's were first in the league as a unit with 8.72 yards per reception the last 7 games of the year. Nobody else was over 8.

    PFF discusses further