Executive Time
-
speaking for myself, there's a point where you realize ur "excutive time" is single handedly paying porn hub's North American server bill. Trump wakes up at 5am and doesn't show up to work till 11....that's 6 straight hours of Czech porno erryday.
-
speaking for myself, there's a point where you realize ur "excutive time" is single handedly paying porn hub's North American server bill. Trump wakes up at 5am and doesn't show up to work till 11....that's 6 straight hours of Czech porno erryday.
speaking for myself, there's a point where you realize ur "excutive time" is single handedly paying porn hub's North American server bill. Trump wakes up at 5am and doesn't show up to work till 11....that's 6 straight hours of Czech porno erryday.
If it saves Melania, I'm all for it.?
-
speaking for myself, there's a point where you realize ur "excutive time" is single handedly paying porn hub's North American server bill. Trump wakes up at 5am and doesn't show up to work till 11....that's 6 straight hours of Czech porno erryday.
If it saves Melania, I'm all for it.?
If it saves Melania, I'm all for it.?
-
Executive time instead of work likely explains this too. He just functions on his "feelings" and "instincts" rather than reality. And many still don't get how dangerous this is for our national security.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/05/politics/votel-trump-syria-withdrawal/index.html
-
Executive time instead of work likely explains this too. He just functions on his "feelings" and "instincts" rather than reality. And many still don't get how dangerous this is for our national security.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/05/politics/votel-trump-syria-withdrawal/index.html
Executive time instead of work likely explains this too. He just functions on his "feelings" and "instincts" rather than reality. And many still don't get how dangerous this is for our national security.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/05/politics/votel-trump-syria-withdrawal/index.html
that's stupid - what to do, given all the facts, is instinct when you choose. Doesn't mean that reality goes by the wayside.
And feelings do come into play, but when they dominate and determine how you SEE reality - which is most all liberals, given the definition of "liberal hypocrite loser", is very dangerous to our national security.
Like, ignoring the pleas for help, and going by emotion to CYA, and let those at Benghazi die and not care. obaMao commie and higgardly the nasty scumbag let their cya feelings dominate reality.
Like perpetrating URANIUM ONE, which Texag still can't muster one brave moment to discuss. (that goes for every other whiney, stupid'retort-is-all-I-got liberals on the board.)
Like feeling that if you give millions and billions of cash to Iran, they will start being our friends.
Like feeling that you need some kind of political win, so you encourage racial hatred, class envy, and contempt for our Constitution and Bill of Rights, etc etc etc etc.
"At this point, what difference does it make" only applies when the left is caught with their pants down and their hands out.
-
Executive time instead of work likely explains this too. He just functions on his "feelings" and "instincts" rather than reality. And many still don't get how dangerous this is for our national security.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/05/politics/votel-trump-syria-withdrawal/index.html
Executive time instead of work likely explains this too. He just functions on his "feelings" and "instincts" rather than reality. And many still don't get how dangerous this is for our national security.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/05/politics/votel-trump-syria-withdrawal/index.html
Which proves his greatness, and his maybe divine calling? His feelings overrule his top advisors.
-
Newt Nails It:
"Monday, the day before the State of the Union, we have the latest example of the kind of artificial hostility that tries to clutter the Trump presidency and make it difficult for the president to build positive momentum.
Some despicable, disloyal person decided to leak the president’s schedule for the last three months. This schedule shows that President Trump protects a lot of his time for learning, thinking and talking with people.
The Washington Trump-haters have decided this is a horrifying example of inadequate work.
Of course, these same members of the Washington establishment disliked Ronald Reagan making frequent visits to his California ranch throughout his presidency.
They would have criticized Dwight Eisenhower’s practice of reading Western novels to clear his head.
They would have been horrified at Churchill’s habit of taking a long nap in the afternoon and then working late into the night. Churchill’s reputation for drinking would have scandalized them.
Finally, they would have challenged Lincoln’s habit of reading the Bible regularly. As good secular liberals they could not imagine why a war-time president would “waste” his time seeking wisdom and solace in the Bible.
I have concluded that President Trump has three groups of opponents.
First, there are the Never Trumpers who just hate the very idea that this non-politician businessman could win the presidency without having gone through the establishment rites of initiation. Whatever he does, they will criticize and oppose.
Second, there are the anti-American radicals who repudiate the message of Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. These are members of the modern left who disdain traditional American principles and want to replace them. He wanted America to live up to the great promises it had made to all people. The radicals have instead concluded that America is inherently racist, homophobic, xenophobic, and misogynist, and it must be destroyed and replaced. They are for open borders because they want to drown traditional Americans in waves of people who are not assimilated and never learn what it means to be American.
I referred to these first two groups as members of the anti-Trump coalition in my New York Times best-seller "Trump’s America: The Truth About Our Nation’s Great Comeback."
However, there has emerged a third group: They are the “trivialists.” I really had not understood the concept of trivialists until I watched the coverage of various “scandals” and “leaks” under the Trump presidency. The hysteria that has been attached to some headlines and stories are examples of those who ignore the great accomplishments in favor of the trivial nonsense. Monday's coverage of the Trump schedule is a perfect example of the trivialists in action."
-
Newt Nails It:
"Monday, the day before the State of the Union, we have the latest example of the kind of artificial hostility that tries to clutter the Trump presidency and make it difficult for the president to build positive momentum.
Some despicable, disloyal person decided to leak the president’s schedule for the last three months. This schedule shows that President Trump protects a lot of his time for learning, thinking and talking with people.
The Washington Trump-haters have decided this is a horrifying example of inadequate work.
Of course, these same members of the Washington establishment disliked Ronald Reagan making frequent visits to his California ranch throughout his presidency.
They would have criticized Dwight Eisenhower’s practice of reading Western novels to clear his head.
They would have been horrified at Churchill’s habit of taking a long nap in the afternoon and then working late into the night. Churchill’s reputation for drinking would have scandalized them.
Finally, they would have challenged Lincoln’s habit of reading the Bible regularly. As good secular liberals they could not imagine why a war-time president would “waste” his time seeking wisdom and solace in the Bible.
I have concluded that President Trump has three groups of opponents.
First, there are the Never Trumpers who just hate the very idea that this non-politician businessman could win the presidency without having gone through the establishment rites of initiation. Whatever he does, they will criticize and oppose.
Second, there are the anti-American radicals who repudiate the message of Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. These are members of the modern left who disdain traditional American principles and want to replace them. He wanted America to live up to the great promises it had made to all people. The radicals have instead concluded that America is inherently racist, homophobic, xenophobic, and misogynist, and it must be destroyed and replaced. They are for open borders because they want to drown traditional Americans in waves of people who are not assimilated and never learn what it means to be American.
I referred to these first two groups as members of the anti-Trump coalition in my New York Times best-seller "Trump’s America: The Truth About Our Nation’s Great Comeback."
However, there has emerged a third group: They are the “trivialists.” I really had not understood the concept of trivialists until I watched the coverage of various “scandals” and “leaks” under the Trump presidency. The hysteria that has been attached to some headlines and stories are examples of those who ignore the great accomplishments in favor of the trivial nonsense. Monday's coverage of the Trump schedule is a perfect example of the trivialists in action."
Newt Nails It:
"Monday, the day before the State of the Union, we have the latest example of the kind of artificial hostility that tries to clutter the Trump presidency and make it difficult for the president to build positive momentum.
Some despicable, disloyal person decided to leak the president’s schedule for the last three months. This schedule shows that President Trump protects a lot of his time for learning, thinking and talking with people.
The Washington Trump-haters have decided this is a horrifying example of inadequate work.
Of course, these same members of the Washington establishment disliked Ronald Reagan making frequent visits to his California ranch throughout his presidency.
They would have criticized Dwight Eisenhower’s practice of reading Western novels to clear his head.
They would have been horrified at Churchill’s habit of taking a long nap in the afternoon and then working late into the night. Churchill’s reputation for drinking would have scandalized them.
Finally, they would have challenged Lincoln’s habit of reading the Bible regularly. As good secular liberals they could not imagine why a war-time president would “waste” his time seeking wisdom and solace in the Bible.
I have concluded that President Trump has three groups of opponents.
First, there are the Never Trumpers who just hate the very idea that this non-politician businessman could win the presidency without having gone through the establishment rites of initiation. Whatever he does, they will criticize and oppose.
Second, there are the anti-American radicals who repudiate the message of Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. These are members of the modern left who disdain traditional American principles and want to replace them. He wanted America to live up to the great promises it had made to all people. The radicals have instead concluded that America is inherently racist, homophobic, xenophobic, and misogynist, and it must be destroyed and replaced. They are for open borders because they want to drown traditional Americans in waves of people who are not assimilated and never learn what it means to be American.
I referred to these first two groups as members of the anti-Trump coalition in my New York Times best-seller "Trump’s America: The Truth About Our Nation’s Great Comeback."
However, there has emerged a third group: They are the “trivialists.” I really had not understood the concept of trivialists until I watched the coverage of various “scandals” and “leaks” under the Trump presidency. The hysteria that has been attached to some headlines and stories are examples of those who ignore the great accomplishments in favor of the trivial nonsense. Monday's coverage of the Trump schedule is a perfect example of the trivialists in action."
Same tired tribal bullshit. Trump a fucking moron, it isn't some conspiracy. The guy is just plain dumb and lazy.
-
-
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate the Drudge Report Right Biased and Questionable due to promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, as well as for publishing fake news and the use of highly questionable sources.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Poor Sources, Some Fake News
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/
Approve 39.9
Disapproval 55.6
-
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate the Drudge Report Right Biased and Questionable due to promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, as well as for publishing fake news and the use of highly questionable sources.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Poor Sources, Some Fake News
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/
Approve 39.9
Disapproval 55.6
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate the Drudge Report Right Biased and Questionable due to promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, as well as for publishing fake news and the use of highly questionable sources.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Poor Sources, Some Fake News
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/
Approve 39.9
Disapproval 55.6
What idiot is unaware of the fact that the Drudge Report has a right-wing bias? Oh I forgot... You I guess
WSS
-
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate the Drudge Report Right Biased and Questionable due to promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, as well as for publishing fake news and the use of highly questionable sources.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Poor Sources, Some Fake News
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/
Approve 39.9
Disapproval 55.6
What idiot is unaware of the fact that the Drudge Report has a right-wing bias? Oh I forgot... You I guess
WSS
What idiot is unaware of the fact that the Drudge Report has a right-wing bias? Oh I forgot... You I guess
WSS
Just Bias. Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Poor Sources, Some Fake News
I know you are your buddies don't care, but these posts aren't for you. But don't let that stop you from whining about it.
-
What idiot is unaware of the fact that the Drudge Report has a right-wing bias? Oh I forgot... You I guess
WSS
Just Bias. Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Poor Sources, Some Fake News
I know you are your buddies don't care, but these posts aren't for you. But don't let that stop you from whining about it.
-
Leave it to newt to rationalize away 6 hours of daily masturbation infront of cable news
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login