Skip to content

Trading Up Predictions

The Browns Board
42 17 1.5k
  • I suspect that if there is a player within short reach in Rd 2, Dorsey may just use some draft capital to go get him if it appears someone else in front is interested. That does not cost near as much as jumping back into the first round from Mid-2nd.

    @texasag1969 said:

    I suspect that if there is a player within short reach in Rd 2, Dorsey may just use some draft capital to go get him if it appears someone else in front is interested. That does not cost near as much as jumping back into the first round from Mid-2nd.

    Yep, that's what I think. He well may trade up if a player he covets drops far enough to where it doesn't cost too much.

    Mike

  • Feels so weird to have little to no enthusiasm for the Draft but being amped up for the season to start as a Browns fan. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    Feels so weird to have little to no enthusiasm for the Draft 

    Why? Because we already made our first-round pick? Everything else is still there..

  • @dutch-oven said:

    Feels so weird to have little to no enthusiasm for the Draft 

    Why? Because we already made our first-round pick? Everything else is still there..

    @unsympathetic said:

    Why? Because we already made our first-round pick? Everything else is still there..

    No first rounder and possibly still burned out by last year's draft. We went hard at that bad boy for three months straight. 

  • Am going to throw out some draft names that may become 'on the market' start of day 2 that JD may trade up for. No it's not perfect, but open to your option..7 are in the Safety group & 6 are in the CB group..Don't see reaching for them, cause equal talent could fall at #49 between 13 S's or CB's.Maybe Dorsey may target 1 in each position group, to go get? LB get's interesting cause the only guy left with above average coverage skills is Mack Wilson imo..This is where trading for Darron Lee would eliminate position coverage need altogether..DT-Jerry Tillery may be there along with Dexter Lawrence. The Only true Tackle left that may get to RD.2 is T Andre Dillard/M.Dettier/D. Risner.2 of 3 may become guards. WR- Marquise Brown with lisfranc foot may also fall? Would have to see him on the browns team invite list to get medical recheck..sure it's a wild guess. but who else am i missing? or who are you hoping to trade up for? Poe'G come on man, you got somebody 😁  

  • here's a scenario..

    We trade Baker Mayfield to the Cardinals for the #1 overall pick, and Josh Rosen

    We take Kyler Murray.

    Murray then, gets traded to the Giants for Saquon Barkley, leaving us with Josh Rosen.

    We then trade Saquon Barkley to the cardinals, for Baker Mayfield..

    Leaving US with Baker, the #1 overall pick,  and the chosen rosen who we then trade to the NYG for our #17 pick back.

    BOOM!

  • here's a scenario..

    We trade Baker Mayfield to the Cardinals for the #1 overall pick, and Josh Rosen

    We take Kyler Murray.

    Murray then, gets traded to the Giants for Saquon Barkley, leaving us with Josh Rosen.

    We then trade Saquon Barkley to the cardinals, for Baker Mayfield..

    Leaving US with Baker, the #1 overall pick,  and the chosen rosen who we then trade to the NYG for our #17 pick back.

    BOOM!

    @domcucch1994 said:

    here's a scenario..

    We trade Baker Mayfield to the Cardinals for the #1 overall pick, and Josh Rosen

    We take Kyler Murray.

    Murray then, gets traded to the Giants for Saquon Barkley, leaving us with Josh Rosen.

    We then trade Saquon Barkley to the cardinals, for Baker Mayfield..

    Leaving US with Baker, the #1 overall pick,  and the chosen rosen who we then trade to the NYG for our #17 pick back.

    BOOM!

    Its original Haha

    But makes no sense for any of the other teams. That leaves Giants with 2 QBs and no Barkley, and Cardinals with 2 RBs and no QB. You would have to expand upon it and say the Giants then trade Murray to Cardinals for Barkley lol

    And at the end, you wouldn't have Baker and #1 pick. You used that #1 pick on Murray who you traded

  • @domcucch1994 said:

    here's a scenario..

    We trade Baker Mayfield to the Cardinals for the #1 overall pick, and Josh Rosen

    We take Kyler Murray.

    Murray then, gets traded to the Giants for Saquon Barkley, leaving us with Josh Rosen.

    We then trade Saquon Barkley to the cardinals, for Baker Mayfield..

    Leaving US with Baker, the #1 overall pick,  and the chosen rosen who we then trade to the NYG for our #17 pick back.

    BOOM!

    Its original Haha

    But makes no sense for any of the other teams. That leaves Giants with 2 QBs and no Barkley, and Cardinals with 2 RBs and no QB. You would have to expand upon it and say the Giants then trade Murray to Cardinals for Barkley lol

    And at the end, you wouldn't have Baker and #1 pick. You used that #1 pick on Murray who you traded

    @gunz41 said:

    Its original Haha

    But makes no sense for any of the other teams. That leaves Giants with 2 QBs and no Barkley, and Cardinals with 2 RBs and no QB. You would have to expand upon it and say the Giants then trade Murray to Cardinals for Barkley lol

    It could happen ...they have Gettleman remember

  • @domcucch1994 said:

    here's a scenario..

    We trade Baker Mayfield to the Cardinals for the #1 overall pick, and Josh Rosen

    We take Kyler Murray.

    Murray then, gets traded to the Giants for Saquon Barkley, leaving us with Josh Rosen.

    We then trade Saquon Barkley to the cardinals, for Baker Mayfield..

    Leaving US with Baker, the #1 overall pick,  and the chosen rosen who we then trade to the NYG for our #17 pick back.

    BOOM!

    Its original Haha

    But makes no sense for any of the other teams. That leaves Giants with 2 QBs and no Barkley, and Cardinals with 2 RBs and no QB. You would have to expand upon it and say the Giants then trade Murray to Cardinals for Barkley lol

    And at the end, you wouldn't have Baker and #1 pick. You used that #1 pick on Murray who you traded

    @gunz41 said:

    Its original Haha

    But makes no sense for any of the other teams. That leaves Giants with 2 QBs and no Barkley, and Cardinals with 2 RBs and no QB. You would have to expand upon it and say the Giants then trade Murray to Cardinals for Barkley lol

    And at the end, you wouldn't have Baker and #1 pick. You used that #1 pick on Murray who you traded

    I didn't think this one through all the way..

  • @gunz41 said:

    Its original Haha

    But makes no sense for any of the other teams. That leaves Giants with 2 QBs and no Barkley, and Cardinals with 2 RBs and no QB. You would have to expand upon it and say the Giants then trade Murray to Cardinals for Barkley lol

    And at the end, you wouldn't have Baker and #1 pick. You used that #1 pick on Murray who you traded

    I didn't think this one through all the way..

    @domcucch1994 said:

    I didn't think this one through all the way..

    It would be awesome to see, and I know you were just being creative.

    So to make it work the way you want, instead of #1 pick, you get #6, and then have Giants trade Murray to Cardinals for Barkley. Then the Browns have #6 and #17 for facilitating all the trades. All this happens in 10 minutes, Browns then trade #6 and #17 to 49ers for #2 pick, which gets them Bosa or Williams

  • If Jeffrey Simmons falls to the 30s than I think we need to trade up. Fingers crossed