Skip to content

Anyone else sick of "analytics?"

The Browns Board
52 15 927
  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
    #10

    My Dad was a very excellent engineer who came out of college with the main tool for mathematical calculation being a slide rule. He eventually became the engineer in charge of major overseas projects and loved hiring engineers "far smarter than me" who came with this newfangled little hand held tool called an electronic calculator. So he would get these guys to help him get the new little tool and teach him the intricacies of what they could do. Then some of his new "smarter than me" hires late in his career started coming in with this other even more dazzling tool called a computer. Well before you know it he was making these guys help him keep up with the latest ones as they came out and teach him the intricacies of what they could do as well. It was that drive to keep up with the changes and his innate talent that eventually made him Mobil's top international trouble-shooting engineer.

    Analytics is a tool. It's best to keep up and change as it changes if you want to stay at the top.

  • It's all bull $#$$. Give me a good coach and GM and they don't need to even bother with this crap. Browns are dipping into this again?

    https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2018/12/19/18148153/nfl-analytics-revolution

    IbleedbrownI Ibleedbrown wrote on last edited by Ibleedbrown
    #11

    @icecube said:

    It's all bull $#$$. Give me a good coach and GM and they don't need to even bother with this crap. Browns are dipping into this again?

    https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2018/12/19/18148153/nfl-analytics-revolution

    This article actually was a pretty good read. Few years old article that shed some light on a few things. Written around when Dorsey was hired and even the NFL teams were trying to figure out what stats mattered and how to use them.

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73
    #12

    i got no issue using some of the data collected on game down situations. Even the scoreboard & game clock math..the facts are what they are, while your opponents are well aware of them also.. where i get concerned is, is when SPARQ scores become a factor between gametape/ team fits/needs or BPA/ and missing the clues in the interview process.. Am still looking for a Pete Carol type coach to put all these 53 piece puzzle together with a workable GM... maybe it is our time ?  

  • U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
    #13

    We don't want a pete carroll type..

    He has an all-pro at QB and a street free agent RB and chooses the run on 3/4 of plays.  The single season Carroll won everything, he had the most expensive OL which not coincidentally is the only time that strategy works.. And many years later, he still can't gameplan to his team's strength..

  • We don't want a pete carroll type..

    He has an all-pro at QB and a street free agent RB and chooses the run on 3/4 of plays.  The single season Carroll won everything, he had the most expensive OL which not coincidentally is the only time that strategy works.. And many years later, he still can't gameplan to his team's strength..

    jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @unsympathetic said:

    We don't want a pete carroll type..

    He has an all-pro at QB and a street free agent RB and chooses the run on 3/4 of plays.  The single season Carroll won everything, he had the most expensive OL which not coincidentally is the only time that strategy works.. And many years later, he still can't gameplan to his team's strength..

    So you’re genuinely saying you wouldn’t want a coach with .630 winning percentage and two Super Bowls in a decade as your coach? I swear to God it’s like you people don’t watch the Browns on the field. Pete would have a statue if he had that same tenure in Cleveland.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #15

    I am not sick of analytics.......I am just sick of losing.    And some think that the Browns are losing because of analytics.   As Stefanski and Depo have said....it is just a tool to help.   

    Well....let's start having it be a tool to help winning instead of it seeming to be the tool that leads to us losing.    When we have a 3/4" nut to tighten, use a 3/4"  wrench.....not a 5/8ths wrench.   Or, if that nut is measured in inches or fractions thereof, don't pull out a metric wrench.   Make the tool work positively, not negatively. 

  • I am not sick of analytics.......I am just sick of losing.    And some think that the Browns are losing because of analytics.   As Stefanski and Depo have said....it is just a tool to help.   

    Well....let's start having it be a tool to help winning instead of it seeming to be the tool that leads to us losing.    When we have a 3/4" nut to tighten, use a 3/4"  wrench.....not a 5/8ths wrench.   Or, if that nut is measured in inches or fractions thereof, don't pull out a metric wrench.   Make the tool work positively, not negatively. 

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @the-gipper said:

    I am not sick of analytics.......I am just sick of losing.    And some think that the Browns are losing because of analytics.   As Stefanski and Depo have said....it is just a tool to help.   

    Well....let's start having it be a tool to help winning instead of it seeming to be the tool that leads to us losing.    When we have a 3/4" nut to tighten, use a 3/4"  wrench.....not a 5/8ths wrench.   Or, if that nut is measured in inches or fractions thereof, don't pull out a metric wrench.   Make the tool work positively, not negatively. 

    Yes it is just another tool but like all tools you can get much better results when placed in the hands (or mind) of someone who knows how to use them.

    Oh remember having tools is better than no tools.

  • @unsympathetic said:

    We don't want a pete carroll type..

    He has an all-pro at QB and a street free agent RB and chooses the run on 3/4 of plays.  The single season Carroll won everything, he had the most expensive OL which not coincidentally is the only time that strategy works.. And many years later, he still can't gameplan to his team's strength..

    So you’re genuinely saying you wouldn’t want a coach with .630 winning percentage and two Super Bowls in a decade as your coach? I swear to God it’s like you people don’t watch the Browns on the field. Pete would have a statue if he had that same tenure in Cleveland.

    U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by Unsympathetic
    #17

    @jrb12711 said:

    So you’re genuinely saying you wouldn’t want a coach with .630 winning percentage and two Super Bowls in a decade as your coach? I swear to God it’s like you people don’t watch the Browns on the field. Pete would have a statue if he had that same tenure in Cleveland.

    Gumby and I both said pete carroll TYPE - not pete carroll.  I swear to God it's like you don't read the posts you're replying to.

    Of course, then you might not get angry, and we can't have that!

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by
    #18

    Im sick of all the unknowns..coaches...garrett...etc etc.

  • I am not sick of analytics.......I am just sick of losing.    And some think that the Browns are losing because of analytics.   As Stefanski and Depo have said....it is just a tool to help.   

    Well....let's start having it be a tool to help winning instead of it seeming to be the tool that leads to us losing.    When we have a 3/4" nut to tighten, use a 3/4"  wrench.....not a 5/8ths wrench.   Or, if that nut is measured in inches or fractions thereof, don't pull out a metric wrench.   Make the tool work positively, not negatively. 

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @the-gipper said:

    I am not sick of analytics.......I am just sick of losing.    And some think that the Browns are losing because of analytics.   As Stefanski and Depo have said....it is just a tool to help.   

    Well....let's start having it be a tool to help winning instead of it seeming to be the tool that leads to us losing.    When we have a 3/4" nut to tighten, use a 3/4"  wrench.....not a 5/8ths wrench.   Or, if that nut is measured in inches or fractions thereof, don't pull out a metric wrench.   Make the tool work positively, not negatively. 

    As I mentioned earlier  from  that article, the Steelers  GM said everyone  pretty  much has the same numbers now,  its which  of those  numbers  you see as most important.  

    DePo also has  said analytics are just a measure of the probability of an event. A player can have all the  right  numbers and still  be a monumental  bust. Vernon  Gholston  or Jamarcus  Russell  anyone?

  • @the-gipper said:

    I am not sick of analytics.......I am just sick of losing.    And some think that the Browns are losing because of analytics.   As Stefanski and Depo have said....it is just a tool to help.   

    Well....let's start having it be a tool to help winning instead of it seeming to be the tool that leads to us losing.    When we have a 3/4" nut to tighten, use a 3/4"  wrench.....not a 5/8ths wrench.   Or, if that nut is measured in inches or fractions thereof, don't pull out a metric wrench.   Make the tool work positively, not negatively. 

    Yes it is just another tool but like all tools you can get much better results when placed in the hands (or mind) of someone who knows how to use them.

    Oh remember having tools is better than no tools.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @mjp28 said:

    Yes it is just another tool but like all tools you can get much better results when placed in the hands (or mind) of someone who knows how to use them.

    Oh remember having tools is better than no tools.

    Yes,  and it also helps a guy have better tools, if he is not so skilled with tools.  I mean, it is much easier change a tire with an electric or hydraulic tire changer than with a tire Iron. 

  • @the-gipper said:

    I am not sick of analytics.......I am just sick of losing.    And some think that the Browns are losing because of analytics.   As Stefanski and Depo have said....it is just a tool to help.   

    Well....let's start having it be a tool to help winning instead of it seeming to be the tool that leads to us losing.    When we have a 3/4" nut to tighten, use a 3/4"  wrench.....not a 5/8ths wrench.   Or, if that nut is measured in inches or fractions thereof, don't pull out a metric wrench.   Make the tool work positively, not negatively. 

    As I mentioned earlier  from  that article, the Steelers  GM said everyone  pretty  much has the same numbers now,  its which  of those  numbers  you see as most important.  

    DePo also has  said analytics are just a measure of the probability of an event. A player can have all the  right  numbers and still  be a monumental  bust. Vernon  Gholston  or Jamarcus  Russell  anyone?

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @hoorta said:

    As I mentioned earlier  from  that article, the Steelers  GM said everyone  pretty  much has the same numbers now,  its which  of those  numbers  you see as most important.  

    DePo also has  said analytics are just a measure of the probability of an event. A player can have all the  right  numbers and still  be a monumental  bust. Vernon  Gholston  or Jamarcus  Russell  anyone?

    That begs the question:   why did it seem that for so many times the Browns took the guys that turned out to be the monumental bust, if all teams had the same numbers?  Was our FO always putting importance on the wrong numbers? 

  • @hoorta said:

    As I mentioned earlier  from  that article, the Steelers  GM said everyone  pretty  much has the same numbers now,  its which  of those  numbers  you see as most important.  

    DePo also has  said analytics are just a measure of the probability of an event. A player can have all the  right  numbers and still  be a monumental  bust. Vernon  Gholston  or Jamarcus  Russell  anyone?

    That begs the question:   why did it seem that for so many times the Browns took the guys that turned out to be the monumental bust, if all teams had the same numbers?  Was our FO always putting importance on the wrong numbers? 

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @the-gipper said:

    That begs the question:   why did it seem that for so many times the Browns took the guys that turned out to be the monumental bust, if all teams had the same numbers?  Was our FO always putting importance on the wrong numbers? 

    Or they weren't  even using the  numbers. Remember  Justin  Gilbert? Then Haslam drafts Johnny Football  for PR, regardless of the  ton of  red flags. 

    Or ignoring stuff that was obvious even to  us draft  amateurs,  ie- Trent  Richardson.  I opined at the time I  saw Trent get caught  from behind  plenty of  times in college.  You never saw that happen to guys like  Barry  Sanders or  Adrian Peterson.  

    There was something  in a side comment from an article  West Side  Steve posted that I  happen to  agree with & it's sort of  scary.  There's too many  holes in the roster to fix in one off season (if you're  being objective), barring a miracle  draft and FA acquisitions. If meddling  Jimmy  is unreasonably expecting a deep  playoff run, and there's  only  marginal improvement,  he had damn well  better keep his fingers off of the nuke button this time, and give this incarnation  of the Browns FO and coaching staff a chance to improve. 

  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #23

    They use CPU Tablets on the sidelines now.....but it use to be prints of pictures taken up in the booth and sent to the sidelines for the QB/OC to look at an 'analyze'.

    Those pictures are analytics.  You're looking at tendencies for certain downs / distances, or offensive alignments.  It's just information gathering.  In this train of thought, you're in between plays and considering a play when your 'offensive analytics coach' in the headset states,  "They tend to be in 'such-n-such' defense and do 'such-n-such' at this down and distance.

    It's all analytics.  Preparing for the draft, getting the measurables of players, how their body weight and mass relates to their position in the nfl.  It's all analytics.  It's information gathering, analyzing, and using,   

    He with the most information, wins.    

  • @the-gipper said:

    That begs the question:   why did it seem that for so many times the Browns took the guys that turned out to be the monumental bust, if all teams had the same numbers?  Was our FO always putting importance on the wrong numbers? 

    Or they weren't  even using the  numbers. Remember  Justin  Gilbert? Then Haslam drafts Johnny Football  for PR, regardless of the  ton of  red flags. 

    Or ignoring stuff that was obvious even to  us draft  amateurs,  ie- Trent  Richardson.  I opined at the time I  saw Trent get caught  from behind  plenty of  times in college.  You never saw that happen to guys like  Barry  Sanders or  Adrian Peterson.  

    There was something  in a side comment from an article  West Side  Steve posted that I  happen to  agree with & it's sort of  scary.  There's too many  holes in the roster to fix in one off season (if you're  being objective), barring a miracle  draft and FA acquisitions. If meddling  Jimmy  is unreasonably expecting a deep  playoff run, and there's  only  marginal improvement,  he had damn well  better keep his fingers off of the nuke button this time, and give this incarnation  of the Browns FO and coaching staff a chance to improve. 

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @hoorta said:

    Or they weren't  even using the  numbers. Remember  Justin  Gilbert? Then Haslam drafts Johnny Football  for PR, regardless of the  ton of  red flags. 

    Or ignoring stuff that was obvious even to  us draft  amateurs,  ie- Trent  Richardson.  I opined at the time I  saw Trent get caught  from behind  plenty of  times in college.  You never saw that happen to guys like  Barry  Sanders or  Adrian Peterson.  

    There was something  in a side comment from an article  West Side  Steve posted that I  happen to  agree with & it's sort of  scary.  There's too many  holes in the roster to fix in one off season (if you're  being objective), barring a miracle  draft and FA acquisitions. If meddling  Jimmy  is unreasonably expecting a deep  playoff run, and there's  only  marginal improvement,  he had damn well  better keep his fingers off of the nuke button this time, and give this incarnation  of the Browns FO and coaching staff a chance to improve. 

    Well, that brings up the issue of expectations.  The fact is, this team was not eliminated until the next to the last week of the season.

    What would be acceptable next year?   Is it OK if we get eliminated in the last week of the season?

    Or, is anything short of a playoff berth a busted year?     I would think so.

    What about division title?  Baltimore's 14-2 record seems a high mountain to climb for the Browns to win the division. 

    So, a "deep playoff run" is an unreasonable expectation?  What about a shallow playoff run?

  • @jrb12711 said:

    So you’re genuinely saying you wouldn’t want a coach with .630 winning percentage and two Super Bowls in a decade as your coach? I swear to God it’s like you people don’t watch the Browns on the field. Pete would have a statue if he had that same tenure in Cleveland.

    Gumby and I both said pete carroll TYPE - not pete carroll.  I swear to God it's like you don't read the posts you're replying to.

    Of course, then you might not get angry, and we can't have that!

    jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
    #25

    @unsympathetic said:

    Gumby and I both said pete carroll TYPE - not pete carroll.  I swear to God it's like you don't read the posts you're replying to.

    Of course, then you might not get angry, and we can't have that!

    Oh come the fuck on man. You can’t try to word smith out of saying something.

    Saying you don’t want a Pete Carroll type is saying you don’t want Pete Carroll. Don’t be obtuse.

  • They use CPU Tablets on the sidelines now.....but it use to be prints of pictures taken up in the booth and sent to the sidelines for the QB/OC to look at an 'analyze'.

    Those pictures are analytics.  You're looking at tendencies for certain downs / distances, or offensive alignments.  It's just information gathering.  In this train of thought, you're in between plays and considering a play when your 'offensive analytics coach' in the headset states,  "They tend to be in 'such-n-such' defense and do 'such-n-such' at this down and distance.

    It's all analytics.  Preparing for the draft, getting the measurables of players, how their body weight and mass relates to their position in the nfl.  It's all analytics.  It's information gathering, analyzing, and using,   

    He with the most information, wins.    

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @orion said:

    They use CPU Tablets on the sidelines now.....but it use to be prints of pictures taken up in the booth and sent to the sidelines for the QB/OC to look at an 'analyze'.

    Those pictures are analytics.  You're looking at tendencies for certain downs / distances, or offensive alignments.  It's just information gathering.  In this train of thought, you're in between plays and considering a play when your 'offensive analytics coach' in the headset states,  "They tend to be in 'such-n-such' defense and do 'such-n-such' at this down and distance.

    It's all analytics.  Preparing for the draft, getting the measurables of players, how their body weight and mass relates to their position in the nfl.  It's all analytics.  It's information gathering, analyzing, and using,   

    He with the most information, wins.    

    Well.....you must be Littlefinger.  "Information is power"?   

    I will take the position of Cersei Lannister:    "Power is power", while she at her whim decides if she should have her guards cut Littlefinger's throat.

    Analytics and all that information is fine......but I will take Talent.  He with the most Talent wins.   Altius, citius, fortius.   Higher, faster, stronger wins. 

  • @hoorta said:

    Or they weren't  even using the  numbers. Remember  Justin  Gilbert? Then Haslam drafts Johnny Football  for PR, regardless of the  ton of  red flags. 

    Or ignoring stuff that was obvious even to  us draft  amateurs,  ie- Trent  Richardson.  I opined at the time I  saw Trent get caught  from behind  plenty of  times in college.  You never saw that happen to guys like  Barry  Sanders or  Adrian Peterson.  

    There was something  in a side comment from an article  West Side  Steve posted that I  happen to  agree with & it's sort of  scary.  There's too many  holes in the roster to fix in one off season (if you're  being objective), barring a miracle  draft and FA acquisitions. If meddling  Jimmy  is unreasonably expecting a deep  playoff run, and there's  only  marginal improvement,  he had damn well  better keep his fingers off of the nuke button this time, and give this incarnation  of the Browns FO and coaching staff a chance to improve. 

    Well, that brings up the issue of expectations.  The fact is, this team was not eliminated until the next to the last week of the season.

    What would be acceptable next year?   Is it OK if we get eliminated in the last week of the season?

    Or, is anything short of a playoff berth a busted year?     I would think so.

    What about division title?  Baltimore's 14-2 record seems a high mountain to climb for the Browns to win the division. 

    So, a "deep playoff run" is an unreasonable expectation?  What about a shallow playoff run?

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @the-gipper said:

    Well, that brings up the issue of expectations.  The fact is, this team was not eliminated until the next to the last week of the season.

    What would be acceptable next year?   Is it OK if we get eliminated in the last week of the season?

    Or, is anything short of a playoff berth a busted year?     I would think so.

    What about division title?  Baltimore's 14-2 record seems a high mountain to climb for the Browns to win the division. 

    So, a "deep playoff run" is an unreasonable expectation?  What about a shallow playoff run?

    Well, I have no expectations for this year, and it's anyone's guess what Jimmy's are.  🙂  After everything except the Super Bowl has played out- that "soft" 2020 schedule doesn't look quite as soft, with the Texans, Titans, and Eagles on it. 

  • @orion said:

    They use CPU Tablets on the sidelines now.....but it use to be prints of pictures taken up in the booth and sent to the sidelines for the QB/OC to look at an 'analyze'.

    Those pictures are analytics.  You're looking at tendencies for certain downs / distances, or offensive alignments.  It's just information gathering.  In this train of thought, you're in between plays and considering a play when your 'offensive analytics coach' in the headset states,  "They tend to be in 'such-n-such' defense and do 'such-n-such' at this down and distance.

    It's all analytics.  Preparing for the draft, getting the measurables of players, how their body weight and mass relates to their position in the nfl.  It's all analytics.  It's information gathering, analyzing, and using,   

    He with the most information, wins.    

    Well.....you must be Littlefinger.  "Information is power"?   

    I will take the position of Cersei Lannister:    "Power is power", while she at her whim decides if she should have her guards cut Littlefinger's throat.

    Analytics and all that information is fine......but I will take Talent.  He with the most Talent wins.   Altius, citius, fortius.   Higher, faster, stronger wins. 

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @the-gipper said:

    i will take the position of Cersei Lannister:    "Power is power",

    In our case, 'The Family'

    The more information you can gather, sort and apply = the more informed the decision.    (predicated by tine restraints)

  • @the-gipper said:

    i will take the position of Cersei Lannister:    "Power is power",

    In our case, 'The Family'

    The more information you can gather, sort and apply = the more informed the decision.    (predicated by tine restraints)

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @orion said:

    In our case, 'The Family'

    The more information you can gather, sort and apply = the more informed the decision.    (predicated by tine restraints)

    Or you're just looking at "measurables" and not taking anything else into account. We would never have drafted Justin Gilbert if we had just looked beyond the measurables. Ditto Johnny Football. 

    For sure teams do a lot of personality tests and background checks now- getting burned badly on those accounts has taught teams a severe lesson. and it's burned the Browns plenty of times not putting enough weight into off field antics. Starting with Jeremiah (robbing the pharmacy) Pharms,  Puffy Gordon, Johnny AA Manziel,  Antonio XFL Callaway, and probably a few others I don't remember off the top of my head.