Skip to content

NFL Combine Invites

The Browns Board
22 9 463
  • I don't see us having a realistic shot at a top 4 Edge (Young, Chaisson, Epenesa, Gross-Matos) and a top three OT (Wills, Thomas, Jones... still not there with Becton) in this draft. 

    So, you think that all 7 of those guys will be gone by the time we draft at 10?

    And since we figure that Burrows at least will be taken in Top Ten......that leaves just one other guy besides these 8 that would be drafted before we have a chance.    So, who is that one other guy?

    (Or, did you exaggerate the chances of all those 7 being gone?)

    @the-gipper said:

    I don't see us having a realistic shot at a top 4 Edge (Young, Chaisson, Epenesa, Gross-Matos) and a top three OT (Wills, Thomas, Jones... still not there with Becton) in this draft. 

    So, you think that all 7 of those guys will be gone by the time we draft at 10?

    And since we figure that Burrows at least will be taken in Top Ten......that leaves just one other guy besides these 8 that would be drafted before we have a chance.    So, who is that one other guy?

    (Or, did you exaggerate the chances of all those 7 being gone?)

    Not sure why I was able to see your post, but since I did...

    My comment was on our chances of drafting one of each of those groupings... thus my use of "and".

  • @the-gipper said:

    I don't see us having a realistic shot at a top 4 Edge (Young, Chaisson, Epenesa, Gross-Matos) and a top three OT (Wills, Thomas, Jones... still not there with Becton) in this draft. 

    So, you think that all 7 of those guys will be gone by the time we draft at 10?

    And since we figure that Burrows at least will be taken in Top Ten......that leaves just one other guy besides these 8 that would be drafted before we have a chance.    So, who is that one other guy?

    (Or, did you exaggerate the chances of all those 7 being gone?)

    Not sure why I was able to see your post, but since I did...

    My comment was on our chances of drafting one of each of those groupings... thus my use of "and".

    @tour2ma said:

    Not sure why I was able to see your post, but since I did...

    My comment was on our chances of drafting one of each of those groupings... thus my use of "and".

    Ah! OK.  I would not think we could get a top 3-4 rated OT or DE/LB with the 9th/10th pick in round 2...which would be like #41-42.  High demand positions.  We might get the #3 OG with that pick.