Browns Board Draft Finished Rounds
-
Cbs has him ranked #466 as a LB.
And, fun fact, PFF actually gave Glasgow the best tackling grade in college football last season.
So he'll never get there by doing something ridiculous like "reading keys", but when he guesses correctly, he'll make the tackle.
-
Cbs has him ranked #466 as a LB.
And, fun fact, PFF actually gave Glasgow the best tackling grade in college football last season.
So he'll never get there by doing something ridiculous like "reading keys", but when he guesses correctly, he'll make the tackle.
Cbs has him ranked #466 as a LB.
And, fun fact, PFF actually gave Glasgow the best tackling grade in college football last season.
So he'll never get there by doing something ridiculous like "reading keys", but when he guesses correctly, he'll make the tackle.
But...per Woody....tackling don't matter in the NFL.
-
Now here's a surprise for you. Walter Football's latest draft has my next to last pick in the BB 7th, WR Kendrick Rogers, going in the 4th round to the LA Chargers @ #112 overall.
Looks like they read my assessment.
"-WR Kendrick Rogers – Los Angeles Chargers – 4th round (112 overall)
“The Chargers gave far too many snaps to someone named Andre Patton last year. Patton may have been the least efficient NFL receiver I've ever seen in my life.
“Kendrick Rogers has flashed some major upside, but he'll need to show improved durability to be chosen in the first round.”-Walterfootball most recent mock draft.
-
Cbs has him ranked #466 as a LB.
And, fun fact, PFF actually gave Glasgow the best tackling grade in college football last season.
So he'll never get there by doing something ridiculous like "reading keys", but when he guesses correctly, he'll make the tackle.
But...per Woody....tackling don't matter in the NFL.
But...per Woody....tackling don't matter in the NFL.
Of course, that's not what I said.
But somehow I just knew you'd get that out of it
-
But...per Woody....tackling don't matter in the NFL.
Of course, that's not what I said.
But somehow I just knew you'd get that out of it
Of course, that's not what I said.
But somehow I just knew you'd get that out of it
You are right. You said that Linebackers were not important in today's football. Yet it is linebackers that are the 17 or the Top 20 tacklers in the league. So, let me rephrase what you said: rather than you say that tackling don't matter......you said........Tackling, or at least the guys that do most of it, is unimportant
-
Of course, that's not what I said.
But somehow I just knew you'd get that out of it
You are right. You said that Linebackers were not important in today's football. Yet it is linebackers that are the 17 or the Top 20 tacklers in the league. So, let me rephrase what you said: rather than you say that tackling don't matter......you said........Tackling, or at least the guys that do most of it, is unimportant
You are right. You said that Linebackers were not important in today's football. Yet it is linebackers that are the 17 or the Top 20 tacklers in the league. So, let me rephrase what you said: rather than you say that tackling don't matter......you said........Tackling, or at least the guys that do most of it, is unimportant
Well at least you got closer with that one...
-
You are right. You said that Linebackers were not important in today's football. Yet it is linebackers that are the 17 or the Top 20 tacklers in the league. So, let me rephrase what you said: rather than you say that tackling don't matter......you said........Tackling, or at least the guys that do most of it, is unimportant
Well at least you got closer with that one...
Well at least you got closer with that one...
No....
not close. Precise. You said Linebackers are unimportant. And it is just a fact that LBs are by far the leading tacklers.
So, now, maybe you want to walk it back what you said. Its OK. No one will think the worse of you. (how can they possibly?)
What you said is tantamount to saying that Wide Receivers are unimportant to the passing game because, after all, there are tight ends and running backs that catch a lot of balls.
-
Well at least you got closer with that one...
No....
not close. Precise. You said Linebackers are unimportant. And it is just a fact that LBs are by far the leading tacklers.
So, now, maybe you want to walk it back what you said. Its OK. No one will think the worse of you. (how can they possibly?)
What you said is tantamount to saying that Wide Receivers are unimportant to the passing game because, after all, there are tight ends and running backs that catch a lot of balls.
No....
not close. Precise. You said Linebackers are unimportant. And it is just a fact that LBs are by far the leading tacklers.
So, now, maybe you want to walk it back what you said. Its OK. No one will think the worse of you. (how can they possibly?)
What you said is tantamount to saying that Wide Receivers are unimportant to the passing game because, after all, there are tight ends and running backs that catch a lot of balls.
Lol. Nice attempt at analogous situation there. Almost made sense in trying to make me look wrong(?)
The passing game is key in the NFL. Positions that impact that position more are more important. On defense, that starts with DBs that cover the WRs, then the DL that try to disrupt the QB, and then finally leaves the LBs as least important. Teams are running sets with less LBs more and more often now.
The fact that they're in a spot to tackle someone doesn't make them important. More tackles on defense doesn't mean more important.
-
No....
not close. Precise. You said Linebackers are unimportant. And it is just a fact that LBs are by far the leading tacklers.
So, now, maybe you want to walk it back what you said. Its OK. No one will think the worse of you. (how can they possibly?)
What you said is tantamount to saying that Wide Receivers are unimportant to the passing game because, after all, there are tight ends and running backs that catch a lot of balls.
Lol. Nice attempt at analogous situation there. Almost made sense in trying to make me look wrong(?)
The passing game is key in the NFL. Positions that impact that position more are more important. On defense, that starts with DBs that cover the WRs, then the DL that try to disrupt the QB, and then finally leaves the LBs as least important. Teams are running sets with less LBs more and more often now.
The fact that they're in a spot to tackle someone doesn't make them important. More tackles on defense doesn't mean more important.
Lol. Nice attempt at analogous situation there. Almost made sense in trying to make me look wrong(?)
The passing game is key in the NFL. Positions that impact that position more are more important. On defense, that starts with DBs that cover the WRs, then the DL that try to disrupt the QB, and then finally leaves the LBs as least important. Teams are running sets with less LBs more and more often now.
The fact that they're in a spot to tackle someone doesn't make them important. More tackles on defense doesn't mean more important.
Nice try. It made sense in trying to make you look wrong, because you are wrong.
Who do you think covers and tackles most TEs and RBs (who actually are doing more pass catching these days)....mostly LBs. What percent of pass attempts actually end up being a sack....and who does most of the tackling when a sack isn't made? Beyond that....it is also LBs either OLBs or blitzing LBs that make a lot of the sacks (those ARE tackles in case you had not heard).
You are just mind numbingly wrong.
-
Lol. Nice attempt at analogous situation there. Almost made sense in trying to make me look wrong(?)
The passing game is key in the NFL. Positions that impact that position more are more important. On defense, that starts with DBs that cover the WRs, then the DL that try to disrupt the QB, and then finally leaves the LBs as least important. Teams are running sets with less LBs more and more often now.
The fact that they're in a spot to tackle someone doesn't make them important. More tackles on defense doesn't mean more important.
Nice try. It made sense in trying to make you look wrong, because you are wrong.
Who do you think covers and tackles most TEs and RBs (who actually are doing more pass catching these days)....mostly LBs. What percent of pass attempts actually end up being a sack....and who does most of the tackling when a sack isn't made? Beyond that....it is also LBs either OLBs or blitzing LBs that make a lot of the sacks (those ARE tackles in case you had not heard).
You are just mind numbingly wrong.
Nice try. It made sense in trying to make you look wrong, because you are wrong.
Who do you think covers and tackles most TEs and RBs (who actually are doing more pass catching these days)....mostly LBs. What percent of pass attempts actually end up being a sack....and who does most of the tackling when a sack isn't made? Beyond that....it is also LBs either OLBs or blitzing LBs that make a lot of the sacks (those ARE tackles in case you had not heard).
You are just mind numbingly wrong.
Sacks are also an overemphasized stat
But alright Gip, I'll let this be. I'm over it. You've been objectively proven wrong before enough times that I know I'm not getting anywhere (how good of a school is Miami of Ohio again? Lol)
-
Nice try. It made sense in trying to make you look wrong, because you are wrong.
Who do you think covers and tackles most TEs and RBs (who actually are doing more pass catching these days)....mostly LBs. What percent of pass attempts actually end up being a sack....and who does most of the tackling when a sack isn't made? Beyond that....it is also LBs either OLBs or blitzing LBs that make a lot of the sacks (those ARE tackles in case you had not heard).
You are just mind numbingly wrong.
Sacks are also an overemphasized stat
But alright Gip, I'll let this be. I'm over it. You've been objectively proven wrong before enough times that I know I'm not getting anywhere (how good of a school is Miami of Ohio again? Lol)
Sacks are also an overemphasized stat
But alright Gip, I'll let this be. I'm over it. You've been objectively proven wrong before enough times that I know I'm not getting anywhere (how good of a school is Miami of Ohio again? Lol)
A. So, now sacks are not important....and tackling is not important. Maybe you think we are talking about soccer.
B. I am objectively right here: Linebackers make more tackles than any other position. The stats don't lie.
C. I would send my kid to Miami Oh. before sending him to Michigan. In fact, I did have my kid apply to Miami Oh. and not Michigan. But, if it makes you feel better, I also did not have him apply to Ohio State. (he went to a school that is better than all of them).
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login