Skip to content

Mack Wilson suffers knee injury, undergoing evaluation

The Browns Board
91 18 3.1k 1
  • @icecube said:

    Well, I'm not sure what art forms have to do with it, but OK. 

    Someone tell me why Schobert wasn't worth keeping. 

    https://dawgpounddaily.com/2020/03/01/cleveland-browns-letting-joe-schobert-walk-unpopular-correct-move/

    Didacticism is an art form.

    (and I can't answer your question re Schobert...I would have thought he was worth keeping.  Only I can think of is that the money Jax gave him was far beyond what the Browns were willing to do.  They should have sign him to an extension a year earlier.

    Didactic, of literature or other art, intended to convey instruction and information. The word is often used to refer to texts that are overburdened with instructive or factual matter to the exclusion of graceful and pleasing detail so that they are pompously dull and erudite.  Herein considered a typical piece of didactic art: 

    Ernst_Haeckel%27s_Artforms_of_Nature_of_1904.jpg

    I Icecube wrote on last edited by
    #76

    @the-gipper said:

    Didacticism is an art form.

    (and I can't answer your question re Schobert...I would have thought he was worth keeping.  Only I can think of is that the money Jax gave him was far beyond what the Browns were willing to do.  They should have sign him to an extension a year earlier.

    Didactic, of literature or other art, intended to convey instruction and information. The word is often used to refer to texts that are overburdened with instructive or factual matter to the exclusion of graceful and pleasing detail so that they are pompously dull and erudite.  Herein considered a typical piece of didactic art: 

    Ernst_Haeckel%27s_Artforms_of_Nature_of_1904.jpg

     
     
     
    di·dac·tic
    /dīˈdaktik/
     
     
    adjective
     
    1. intended to teach, particularly in having moral instruction as an ulterior motive.
      "a didactic novel that set out to expose social injustice"
    1.  
  • @the-gipper said:

    Didacticism is an art form.

    (and I can't answer your question re Schobert...I would have thought he was worth keeping.  Only I can think of is that the money Jax gave him was far beyond what the Browns were willing to do.  They should have sign him to an extension a year earlier.

    Didactic, of literature or other art, intended to convey instruction and information. The word is often used to refer to texts that are overburdened with instructive or factual matter to the exclusion of graceful and pleasing detail so that they are pompously dull and erudite.  Herein considered a typical piece of didactic art: 

    Ernst_Haeckel%27s_Artforms_of_Nature_of_1904.jpg

     
     
     
    di·dac·tic
    /dīˈdaktik/
     
     
    adjective
     
    1. intended to teach, particularly in having moral instruction as an ulterior motive.
      "a didactic novel that set out to expose social injustice"
    1.  
    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #77

    @icecube said:

     
     
     
    di·dac·tic
    /dīˈdaktik/
     
     
    1.  

    Yes, I am well aware of that.   I was just playing around with the art form of that particular expression......and still saying that  you were more Dada:   Deliberately irrational and negatory toward tradition. 

    Now, for Nickers,  the form of art expression he would adhere to is strictly:  Dick.  https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3bjdzy/the-prime-minister-of-dick-is-the-best-penis-artist-on-earth-666

  • @flugel said:

    I hear ya!  I'm not getting Jiggy with it either. 

    If you're going to link ROTM, you have to put on the full version.  The piano intro really helps hype the song.

    @nickers said:

    I don't mean to upset the Apple Cart here.. But I see this team winning 6-8 games if they are lucky...  I'm not sold on this defensive philosophy ,LB'ers or Safeties... Everything else on the perimeter seems legit.. Greedy,Ward, D-Line.. etc..

    Since you're now floating into my territory and talking about a coach who hails from one of my favorite football tree's,  what specifically about the philosophy don't you like?

    nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #78

    @tiamat63 said:

    If you're going to link ROTM, you have to put on the full version.  The piano intro really helps hype the song.

    Since you're now floating into my territory and talking about a coach who hails from one of my favorite football tree's,  what specifically about the philosophy don't you like?

    The prevent style D they will use... They will get Torched.. TE's are gonna have a field day on us..

  • @icecube said:

     
     
     
    di·dac·tic
    /dīˈdaktik/
     
     
    1.  

    Yes, I am well aware of that.   I was just playing around with the art form of that particular expression......and still saying that  you were more Dada:   Deliberately irrational and negatory toward tradition. 

    Now, for Nickers,  the form of art expression he would adhere to is strictly:  Dick.  https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3bjdzy/the-prime-minister-of-dick-is-the-best-penis-artist-on-earth-666

    nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #79

    @the-gipper said:

    Yes, I am well aware of that.   I was just playing around with the art form of that particular expression......and still saying that  you were more Dada:   Deliberately irrational and negatory toward tradition. 

    Now, for Nickers,  the form of art expression he would adhere to is strictly:  Dick.  https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3bjdzy/the-prime-minister-of-dick-is-the-best-penis-artist-on-earth-666

    Your Boyfriend... How quaint!

  • @the-gipper said:

    Yes, I am well aware of that.   I was just playing around with the art form of that particular expression......and still saying that  you were more Dada:   Deliberately irrational and negatory toward tradition. 

    Now, for Nickers,  the form of art expression he would adhere to is strictly:  Dick.  https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3bjdzy/the-prime-minister-of-dick-is-the-best-penis-artist-on-earth-666

    Your Boyfriend... How quaint!

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #80

    @nickers said:

    Your Boyfriend... How quaint!

    See what I mean about Nickers and "Dick Art"?  Every post is another entry into that form of expression. 

  • WarriorsRpussiesW WarriorsRpussies wrote on last edited by
    #81

    Looks like he won't need surgery. Out for only 4-6 weeks which is good news for once!

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
    #82
  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #83

    He's gonna be gimpy all year.

  • He's gonna be gimpy all year.

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
    #84

    @orion said:

    He's gonna be gimpy all year.

    gimp.jpeg

  • He's gonna be gimpy all year.

    jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
    #85

    @orion said:

    He's gonna be gimpy all year.

    It also helps that he's super young. Youth definitely heals quicker! 

    We got two super big breaks in that Johnson and Wilson will be back sooner than later. Johnson might be back as early as week 1 but I seriously doubt it. The Wilson injury terrifies me because our linebackers are probably the lowest rated in the league and now we lost Wilson for the opener AND Delpit in the secondary. Delpit really hurts because he was going to allow us flexibility on formations. Without him, we're scrambling. 

    Well, we're getting closer to week 1 and I have no clue what to expect. I don't want to be negative, but if I was a betting man I couldn't take the Browns under any circumstances. 

  • @orion said:

    He's gonna be gimpy all year.

    It also helps that he's super young. Youth definitely heals quicker! 

    We got two super big breaks in that Johnson and Wilson will be back sooner than later. Johnson might be back as early as week 1 but I seriously doubt it. The Wilson injury terrifies me because our linebackers are probably the lowest rated in the league and now we lost Wilson for the opener AND Delpit in the secondary. Delpit really hurts because he was going to allow us flexibility on formations. Without him, we're scrambling. 

    Well, we're getting closer to week 1 and I have no clue what to expect. I don't want to be negative, but if I was a betting man I couldn't take the Browns under any circumstances. 

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #86

    @jiggins7919 said:

    It also helps that he's super young. Youth definitely heals quicker! 

    Well, we're getting closer to week 1 and I have no clue what to expect. I don't want to be negative, but if I was a betting man I couldn't take the Browns under any circumstances. 

    1)  I'm guessing that they put Mack Wilson on IR and then take him off IR when allowed (what is it, 8 games?).

    2)  It's very hard to bet on any team without getting any hints from the preseason.  But us?  With all of our newness (again)?  Playing against a stable, strong team / organization?  ForgetAboutit.

  • @jiggins7919 said:

    It also helps that he's super young. Youth definitely heals quicker! 

    Well, we're getting closer to week 1 and I have no clue what to expect. I don't want to be negative, but if I was a betting man I couldn't take the Browns under any circumstances. 

    1)  I'm guessing that they put Mack Wilson on IR and then take him off IR when allowed (what is it, 8 games?).

    2)  It's very hard to bet on any team without getting any hints from the preseason.  But us?  With all of our newness (again)?  Playing against a stable, strong team / organization?  ForgetAboutit.

    jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
    #87

    @orion said:

    1)  I'm guessing that they put Mack Wilson on IR and then take him off IR when allowed (what is it, 8 games?).

    2)  It's very hard to bet on any team without getting any hints from the preseason.  But us?  With all of our newness (again)?  Playing against a stable, strong team / organization?  ForgetAboutit.

    Don't forget about the season opener curse. Lmao 

  • @orion said:

    1)  I'm guessing that they put Mack Wilson on IR and then take him off IR when allowed (what is it, 8 games?).

    2)  It's very hard to bet on any team without getting any hints from the preseason.  But us?  With all of our newness (again)?  Playing against a stable, strong team / organization?  ForgetAboutit.

    Don't forget about the season opener curse. Lmao 

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #88

    @jiggins7919 said:

    Don't forget about the season opener curse. Lmao 

    🙂 Nope, I didn't.  I was going to add that it doesn't seem like we'd be breaking our opening day loss tradition this year.   It seems like we're constantly starting seasons with new coaching regimes....with little to no chance of winning game 1.

  • @jiggins7919 said:

    Don't forget about the season opener curse. Lmao 

    🙂 Nope, I didn't.  I was going to add that it doesn't seem like we'd be breaking our opening day loss tradition this year.   It seems like we're constantly starting seasons with new coaching regimes....with little to no chance of winning game 1.

    jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
    #89

    @orion said:

    🙂 Nope, I didn't.  I was going to add that it doesn't seem like we'd be breaking our opening day loss tradition this year.   It seems like we're constantly starting seasons with new coaching regimes....with little to no chance of winning game 1.

    And this is about as bad of a week 1 as I can think of. Can you think of another team you'd like to play less? Maybe the Chiefs, but that's about it. 

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #90

    Could it get any worse than a 43-13 home opener loss to the Titans? Hell, Mariota was under center 🥷,,, Baker chucked up 3 picks & was sacked 5 times....

    i don't see the ravens hitting 30.. and Baker won't have to force anything... welcome to... eat the clock & move the chains football.. stay tuned for week 1...W00F !! 

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
    #91

    building depth is smart - the Browns will miss Wilson, I'm a big fan....but I'm also a fan of Jacob Phillips at lb -

    https://www.brownsnation.com/jacob-phillips-makes-transition-to-become-mack-wilsons-replacement/

    https://www.cleveland.com/browns/2020/09/browns-3rd-round-lb-jacob-phillips-feels-ready-to-help-replace-mack-wilson-vs-ravens.html

    Highlights - the kid can play !