The "It's-later-than-you-think" 2021 Mock Draft Thread
-
Playing with gum's sim find... this time wheelin' n dealin'.
Trading is "easy" with the "trade meter" evaluating your offers. All trades are user initiated, but if you try to trade with a team who is not interested the meter sits there empty.
#95 - you sure like that dark horse QB don't ya.?
#95 - you sure like that dark horse QB don't ya.?
In our mock draft I selected him at #74 for the WTFs. There is a team in need of a future QB, and unless they do a trade up from #19 I don't see them getting any of the top 5: Trevor, Fields, Jones, Wilson, and the ND St. guy. I could actually see him going to them at #51.
Fair to say?
-
#95 - you sure like that dark horse QB don't ya.?
In our mock draft I selected him at #74 for the WTFs. There is a team in need of a future QB, and unless they do a trade up from #19 I don't see them getting any of the top 5: Trevor, Fields, Jones, Wilson, and the ND St. guy. I could actually see him going to them at #51.
Fair to say?
In our mock draft I selected him at #74 for the WTFs. There is a team in need of a future QB, and unless they do a trade up from #19 I don't see them getting any of the top 5: Trevor, Fields, Jones, Wilson, and the ND St. guy. I could actually see him going to them at #51.
Fair to say?
Very possible .
-
I’m on the Davis Mills QB Stanford bandwagon.
Maybe he gets to our 4th round pick. He would be a great understudy (redshirt year next season) I think he would mesh well with Stefanski’s offense and take over the 2nd QB spot in 2022 and we can cut Keenum and save the dough where it is needed elsewhere.
-
I’m on the Davis Mills QB Stanford bandwagon.
Maybe he gets to our 4th round pick. He would be a great understudy (redshirt year next season) I think he would mesh well with Stefanski’s offense and take over the 2nd QB spot in 2022 and we can cut Keenum and save the dough where it is needed elsewhere.
I’m on the Davis Mills QB Stanford bandwagon.
Maybe he gets to our 4th round pick. He would be a great understudy (redshirt year next season) I think he would mesh well with Stefanski’s offense and take over the 2nd QB spot in 2022 and we can cut Keenum and save the dough where it is needed elsewhere.
On ESPN today, they were saying that the Steelers could take him with the #24 pick. Or that the TB Bucs could get him at #32 to sit behind Brady for a while. So, don't be surprised if he is long gone before the 4th round.
-
I’m on the Davis Mills QB Stanford bandwagon.
Maybe he gets to our 4th round pick. He would be a great understudy (redshirt year next season) I think he would mesh well with Stefanski’s offense and take over the 2nd QB spot in 2022 and we can cut Keenum and save the dough where it is needed elsewhere.
On ESPN today, they were saying that the Steelers could take him with the #24 pick. Or that the TB Bucs could get him at #32 to sit behind Brady for a while. So, don't be surprised if he is long gone before the 4th round.
On ESPN today, they were saying that the Steelers could take him with the #24 pick. Or that the TB Bucs could get him at #32 to sit behind Brady for a while. So, don't be surprised if he is long gone before the 4th round.
Yeah I hear he is climbing. Rightfully so he’s a solid prospect.
Very limited experience I think he only has 13 career starts at Stanford.
-
Playing with gum's sim find... this time wheelin' n dealin'.
Trading is "easy" with the "trade meter" evaluating your offers. All trades are user initiated, but if you try to trade with a team who is not interested the meter sits there empty.
And the results...
Playing with gum's sim find... this time wheelin' n dealin'.
Trading is "easy" with the "trade meter" evaluating your offers. All trades are user initiated, but if you try to trade with a team who is not interested the meter sits there empty.
And the results...
There’s just not enough room on the roster for all these is there?
-
Playing with gum's sim find... this time wheelin' n dealin'.
Trading is "easy" with the "trade meter" evaluating your offers. All trades are user initiated, but if you try to trade with a team who is not interested the meter sits there empty.
And the results...
There’s just not enough room on the roster for all these is there?
There’s just not enough room on the roster for all these is there?
Details... details...
-
Playing with gum's sim find... this time wheelin' n dealin'.
Trading is "easy" with the "trade meter" evaluating your offers. All trades are user initiated, but if you try to trade with a team who is not interested the meter sits there empty.
And the results...
There’s just not enough room on the roster for all these is there?
There’s just not enough room on the roster for all these is there?
Well I’ll help...cut Wilson and give Moses a try...but rinse and repeat a couple years later probably
-
There’s just not enough room on the roster for all these is there?
Well I’ll help...cut Wilson and give Moses a try...but rinse and repeat a couple years later probably
Well I’ll help...cut Wilson and give Moses a try...but rinse and repeat a couple years later probably
-
I think PFF's OL grading is pretty good... at least that was my experience when once-upon-a-time I graded our OL. And, yes, Glasgow is a building block. Really liked him when a scouted him a few drafts ago.
Your QB question is a good one.
My answer is: Yes... until a better one comes along. Goes with my philosophy of you always need to be looking for your next QB. Only the intensity (and price you are willing to pay) vary.
It's why you take a Day 3 QB (or sign a UDFA) close to every year. There's almost always a "dark-horse" out there who has a shot. It's how NE came across TB12. It's like panning for gold.
It's why a Philly spends a 2nd on a Hurts when they have a Wentz.
Even explains a team taking two QBs in the same draft (WSH 2012... RG3 and Cousins).
Exactly. So I guess my point ends up coming back around on itself.
I don't believe Lock is their "long term" answer at this point. And outside of center, Denver's oline is pretty good. However I think it would be stupid for them to end up taking the 3rd or 4th QB in this draft (possibly Fields) because that really doesn't strike me as a winning strategy. At which point when Lawrence is picked #1, teams will have to basically convince themselves they love the next guy. How many times have we see this in the last decade alone? Gabbert, Bortles, Weeden, Manziel, Lynch, etc etc.
Exactly. So I guess my point ends up coming back around on itself.
I don't believe Lock is their "long term" answer at this point. And outside of center, Denver's oline is pretty good. However I think it would be stupid for them to end up taking the 3rd or 4th QB in this draft (possibly Fields)
Yo... @the-gipper
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login