Skip to content

Week 14: BLT @ CLE on MNF... Is shit is about to get real? Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore(so)"...

The Browns Board
90 25 3.2k
  • @texasag1969 said:

    miss the good old Clueless-Hueless days when we fucked up clock management every f'n game.? ?

    @dutch-oven said:

    Freddie had some awesome clock management moments too...

    Omg, you're not kidding. How many times did that bite us in the ass? Did we EVER score before half? The funny thing was that Freddie team had talent. We should have beaten both the Rams and Seahawks with a huge win in Baltimore, but no discipline or coaching intelligence. 

    ComeonmanC Comeonman wrote on last edited by
    #58

    @jiggins7919 said:

    Omg, you're not kidding. How many times did that bite us in the ass? Did we EVER score before half? The funny thing was that Freddie team had talent. We should have beaten both the Rams and Seahawks with a huge win in Baltimore, but no discipline or coaching intelligence. 

    Didn’t score before half then. Don’t score after half now ?

  • @jiggins7919 said:

    Omg, you're not kidding. How many times did that bite us in the ass? Did we EVER score before half? The funny thing was that Freddie team had talent. We should have beaten both the Rams and Seahawks with a huge win in Baltimore, but no discipline or coaching intelligence. 

    Didn’t score before half then. Don’t score after half now ?

    jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
    #59

    @comeonman said:

    Didn’t score before half then. Don’t score after half now ?

    Well, there's some truth to that. Some of it is simply how games unfolded. When you have a big lead, you're not trying to score as much as you are trying to drain clock and be safe with the ball. I think we're still learning how to finish games, but we got a little better last week. Don't forget we were up 20 with 1:45 to go. We made late mistakes, and we'll learn from them. 

    We've also had a troubling amount of 3rd down drops in the second half, each one essentially a turnover of sorts. That shit can't happen if we're going to beat division teams. Remember that drop OBJ had against the Ravens week 1? Can't happen. 

  • @comeonman said:

    Didn’t score before half then. Don’t score after half now ?

    Well, there's some truth to that. Some of it is simply how games unfolded. When you have a big lead, you're not trying to score as much as you are trying to drain clock and be safe with the ball. I think we're still learning how to finish games, but we got a little better last week. Don't forget we were up 20 with 1:45 to go. We made late mistakes, and we'll learn from them. 

    We've also had a troubling amount of 3rd down drops in the second half, each one essentially a turnover of sorts. That shit can't happen if we're going to beat division teams. Remember that drop OBJ had against the Ravens week 1? Can't happen. 

    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #60

    @jiggins7919 said:

    Well, there's some truth to that. Some of it is simply how games unfolded. When you have a big lead, you're not trying to score as much as you are trying to drain clock and be safe with the ball. I think we're still learning how to finish games, but we got a little better last week. Don't forget we were up 20 with 1:45 to go. We made late mistakes, and we'll learn from them. 

    We've also had a troubling amount of 3rd down drops in the second half, each one essentially a turnover of sorts. That shit can't happen if we're going to beat division teams. Remember that drop OBJ had against the Ravens week 1? Can't happen. 

    YEP. Seems he was looking at defenders and not watching the ball in, bad mistake.

  • U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
    #61
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
    #62

    We have the rare Saturday Practice Reports...

    Ward and Hodge Out. Hoop DNP'd again.

    image.thumb.png.88950c619ad92e9f18ac2fb7626bf615.png

    Meanwhile in Raven-land... Campbell and Williams looking really iffy. Most of rest good to go, but a new name, Wilson (TE) appears.

    image.thumb.png.98ad299602992454439a5ce9afc6012b.png

    Again nothing to add from Injury reports except that Teller is still listed as Out.

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #63

    Not much different from Rats site after practice either...  https://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/who-s-playing-who-s-not-vs-browns-x0092 

    Would you not try some? up tempo/no huddle sets to trap some Rats from Rotating ? 

  • Not much different from Rats site after practice either...  https://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/who-s-playing-who-s-not-vs-browns-x0092 

    Would you not try some? up tempo/no huddle sets to trap some Rats from Rotating ? 

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #64

    @gumby73 said:

    Would you not try some? up tempo/no huddle sets to trap some Rats from Rotating ? 

    Good question which I'll answer with one...

    Since we run so many 12 and 13 packages, if we get into a 3rd and long, are you willing to go with either of those personnel groups?

    Maybe in a 12 with Hunt on the field, but otherwise I'd think we'd want to do a lil subbing ourselves.

    Of course it's not as iff we can go 5 WR with only 4 active... 😉

  • @gumby73 said:

    Would you not try some? up tempo/no huddle sets to trap some Rats from Rotating ? 

    Good question which I'll answer with one...

    Since we run so many 12 and 13 packages, if we get into a 3rd and long, are you willing to go with either of those personnel groups?

    Maybe in a 12 with Hunt on the field, but otherwise I'd think we'd want to do a lil subbing ourselves.

    Of course it's not as iff we can go 5 WR with only 4 active... 😉

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #65

    @tour2ma said:

    Good question which I'll answer with one...  Good! Riddle me off 2 more ?

    Maybe in a 12 with Hunt on the field, but otherwise I'd think we'd want to do a lil subbing ourselves.

    1) I reviewed the tv broadcast twice.. I don't recall anything live, that would have put Hooper in a spot with having a neck injury..Am I missing something on the tv broadcast?

    2) My Toledo Rocket-man Hunt?... Live!==There ain't noway Baker can see lil'Hunt over them DL trees, than over/under them titans LB'er trees ? in the middle.. I counted.. Once! Baker could have thrown Hunt open over the middle & under safety help..

    NFL True Fact.... Defenses don't let guys get wide open... But man did Baker see a few coverage's that he lit up ? (more of that please!)   

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #66

    When was the last time Baker threw a pass over the middle to anyone?

  • When was the last time Baker threw a pass over the middle to anyone?

    jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
    #67

    @tour2ma said:

    When was the last time Baker threw a pass over the middle to anyone?

    First 8 games, hardly at all. Last 4 games, you're starting to see it a bit more. Several to Landry, DPJ and Higgins. The reason it's happening a bit more is Baker is much more adept at moving defenders with his eyes, and he's also understanding where to go with the ball against the defense. To be fair, we haven't exactly played many nasty defenses lately, but whatever. Not our fault. The odd thing to me is that we haven't been targeting TEs hardly at all, and I really don't like the fact that Hooper is out (probably). 

    Additionally, the passes over the middle are also a result of Baker being more comfortable with the empty formations. An analyst I respect was saying Baker excelling in the empty is what will make him extremely dangerous moving forward because Stefanski will use so much motion and switch formations so often during one play that it's very difficult for a defense to be prepared. We're comfortable flaring out our TEs wide, bunching them up, bringing them to the backfield, and we'll do the same thing with our WRs AND our RBs. Heck, we had Jarvis in the backfield for a play last game and did play-action to him, and then threw it to him. 

    The reason I don't love our game tomorrow is because the Ravens play aggressive man coverage and I don't think we have the personnel to win consistently, and basically nobody runs on the Ravens, so our play-action passing attack is going to be neutered. They're going to crowd the line of scrimmage, fire their DEs directly to Baker (ignoring the handoff), and trust their corners to lock down our receivers. If the refs let them get away with murder, we're screwed. 

    The DEs firing to Baker is what's causing our intentional grounding streak, if anyone is curious. What defenses are doing is essentially telling their DEs, "Look, he snaps that ball and no matter WHAT, you go after the QB. Let your teammates tackle the RB if it's handed off, but you stay on Baker." I believe we now have 4 straight games with a grounding penalty, and that's the most I've ever seen. These are happening when Baker turns around after a play-fake and has a gigantic man 8 inches from his face. He doesn't want to take a sack so he flings it out of bounds. Now, the COUNTER to this defensive maneuver is the cutback lane on the handoff. You may remember the announcer in one of our recent games saying, "Browns now specifically targeting the cutback lanes." 

    We'll see how it goes tomorrow. Ravens have their entire season on the line and I'm not sure we're ready to knock out big brother. Too many things have to go right, and we're not there yet. Prove me wrong, Brownies! LET'S GO! 

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #68

    Hooper, Ward and Hodge are out. Teller is probably HOPEFULLY.

    Going to be a blockbuster game - the Browns are now a team that has FUN fighting

    every play. With this coaching staff...they are fun to watch -  adversity doesn't faze them, they just

    kick in to a meaner, higher gear.

  • Hooper, Ward and Hodge are out. Teller is probably HOPEFULLY.

    Going to be a blockbuster game - the Browns are now a team that has FUN fighting

    every play. With this coaching staff...they are fun to watch -  adversity doesn't faze them, they just

    kick in to a meaner, higher gear.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #69

    @calfoxwc said:

    Hooper, Ward and Hodge are out. Teller is probably HOPEFULLY.

    Going to be a blockbuster game - the Browns are now a team that has FUN fighting

    every play. With this coaching staff...they are fun to watch -  adversity doesn't faze them, they just

    kick in to a meaner, higher gear.

    Has Ward ever been "in"? 

  • Hooper, Ward and Hodge are out. Teller is probably HOPEFULLY.

    Going to be a blockbuster game - the Browns are now a team that has FUN fighting

    every play. With this coaching staff...they are fun to watch -  adversity doesn't faze them, they just

    kick in to a meaner, higher gear.

    jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
    #70

    @calfoxwc said:

    Hooper, Ward and Hodge are out. Teller is probably HOPEFULLY.

    Going to be a blockbuster game - the Browns are now a team that has FUN fighting

    every play. With this coaching staff...they are fun to watch -  adversity doesn't faze them, they just

    kick in to a meaner, higher gear.

    Man I want this game so bad. Maybe more than I've wanted a Browns victory than I can remember. The reason is obviously for our season and post season goals, but also there's more to it. We need to be able to beat Baltimore and Pittsburgh. We somehow beat the Ravens once in each of last two years, but I NEVER expect us to beat them, ever. Remember, they hold the all time record at something like 34-12. I wish I was exaggerating. I will never pick us to beat either of those teams until the tide turns...and it's close, but hasn't happened just yet. I realize we're a different team than during game 1, but they are beyond confident and they should be. They killed us week 1. 

    Man I'd love to spoil their season! 

  • @calfoxwc said:

    Hooper, Ward and Hodge are out. Teller is probably HOPEFULLY.

    Going to be a blockbuster game - the Browns are now a team that has FUN fighting

    every play. With this coaching staff...they are fun to watch -  adversity doesn't faze them, they just

    kick in to a meaner, higher gear.

    Has Ward ever been "in"? 

    jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
    #71

    @the-gipper said:

    Has Ward ever been "in"? 

    He had a chance up until yesterday and was ruled out. Damn calf injuries. 

  • @the-gipper said:

    Has Ward ever been "in"? 

    He had a chance up until yesterday and was ruled out. Damn calf injuries. 

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #72

    @jiggins7919 said:

    He had a chance up until yesterday and was ruled out. Damn calf injuries. 

    ...we need him.

  • hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #73

    Weather game time forecast- near freezing temperatures with a gentle 15-20mph NW breeze coming off the Lake.  🙂  

  • Weather game time forecast- near freezing temperatures with a gentle 15-20mph NW breeze coming off the Lake.  🙂  

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #74

    @hoorta said:

    Weather game time forecast- near freezing temperatures with a gentle 15-20mph NW breeze coming off the Lake.  🙂  

    Oh that should be fun for a relatively inaccurate Ravens QB. Just keep him contained and make him throw.

  • @tour2ma said:

    When was the last time Baker threw a pass over the middle to anyone?

    First 8 games, hardly at all. Last 4 games, you're starting to see it a bit more. Several to Landry, DPJ and Higgins. The reason it's happening a bit more is Baker is much more adept at moving defenders with his eyes, and he's also understanding where to go with the ball against the defense. To be fair, we haven't exactly played many nasty defenses lately, but whatever. Not our fault. The odd thing to me is that we haven't been targeting TEs hardly at all, and I really don't like the fact that Hooper is out (probably). 

    Additionally, the passes over the middle are also a result of Baker being more comfortable with the empty formations. An analyst I respect was saying Baker excelling in the empty is what will make him extremely dangerous moving forward because Stefanski will use so much motion and switch formations so often during one play that it's very difficult for a defense to be prepared. We're comfortable flaring out our TEs wide, bunching them up, bringing them to the backfield, and we'll do the same thing with our WRs AND our RBs. Heck, we had Jarvis in the backfield for a play last game and did play-action to him, and then threw it to him. 

    The reason I don't love our game tomorrow is because the Ravens play aggressive man coverage and I don't think we have the personnel to win consistently, and basically nobody runs on the Ravens, so our play-action passing attack is going to be neutered. They're going to crowd the line of scrimmage, fire their DEs directly to Baker (ignoring the handoff), and trust their corners to lock down our receivers. If the refs let them get away with murder, we're screwed. 

    The DEs firing to Baker is what's causing our intentional grounding streak, if anyone is curious. What defenses are doing is essentially telling their DEs, "Look, he snaps that ball and no matter WHAT, you go after the QB. Let your teammates tackle the RB if it's handed off, but you stay on Baker." I believe we now have 4 straight games with a grounding penalty, and that's the most I've ever seen. These are happening when Baker turns around after a play-fake and has a gigantic man 8 inches from his face. He doesn't want to take a sack so he flings it out of bounds. Now, the COUNTER to this defensive maneuver is the cutback lane on the handoff. You may remember the announcer in one of our recent games saying, "Browns now specifically targeting the cutback lanes." 

    We'll see how it goes tomorrow. Ravens have their entire season on the line and I'm not sure we're ready to knock out big brother. Too many things have to go right, and we're not there yet. Prove me wrong, Brownies! LET'S GO! 

    U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by Unsympathetic
    #75

    @jiggins7919 said:

    I don't think we have the personnel to win consistently, and basically nobody runs on the Ravens, so

    Not the case in 2020.

    2020 NFL run D stats

    Ravens have given up more total yds than Browns, a higher YPC, and substantially more big rushing plays.  Only stat the Ravens have over Cleveland: we've given up 3 more TD's.

    My .02 says we make that stat even tonight.

  • @jiggins7919 said:

    I don't think we have the personnel to win consistently, and basically nobody runs on the Ravens, so

    Not the case in 2020.

    2020 NFL run D stats

    Ravens have given up more total yds than Browns, a higher YPC, and substantially more big rushing plays.  Only stat the Ravens have over Cleveland: we've given up 3 more TD's.

    My .02 says we make that stat even tonight.

    jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
    #76

    @unsympathetic said:

    Ravens have given up more total yds than Browns, a higher YPC, and substantially more big rushing plays.  Only stat the Ravens have over Cleveland: we've given up 3 more TD's.

    That's interesting because I went back and looked at the Ravens' opponent rush numbers and basically nobody did well the past 4-5 games. I think Henry was only one to break 100, and didn't do much until overtime (I think). 

    I might not be rational right now. I admit it. My brain simply will NOT accept anything but the Ravens giving us the business. Even though we beat them each of the last two years, that game 1 whipping is so fresh in my mind. Honestly, if we had OBJ and Hooper I'd probably pick us, but I am just not sure how our receivers are going to break free from that sticky man coverage, and I really don't think we're going to be able to run it. 

  • S Silver slayer wrote on last edited by
    #77

    4.6 ypc against,  alright chubb/hunt combine for250

    Rats get punched in the nuts tonight. 

    In 2 weeks the colts bash and trash shittsburgh. 

    Week 17 snf we get revenge and take the north