Of course they won’t play
-
Tough luck for OSU.
I don't see how the league can go back and change the rules for one member at this point. You want to talk about looking rinky dink, that would do it.
Tough luck for OSU.
I don't see how the league can go back and change the rules for one member at this point. You want to talk about looking rinky dink, that would do it.
They can do it. It was just an arbitrary ad hoc made up rule to begin with....so there is no reason to think they could not change it. Besides, it may be possible that they can get a replacement game against another school. Maybe even Indiana...again, because their game vs. Purdue looks like it could be canceled. Or they may switch some things around, I hear they may say: Minnesota goes to play OSU, and Nebraska, who was to be Minn's opponent would play Indiana because Purdue cancels, and they avoid a rematch that way.
-
I would think if it was Alabama and the SEC. The rule would be changed
-
It is the only way for Harbaugh not to lose another rivalry game
-
Tough luck for OSU.
I don't see how the league can go back and change the rules for one member at this point. You want to talk about looking rinky dink, that would do it.
They can do it. It was just an arbitrary ad hoc made up rule to begin with....so there is no reason to think they could not change it. Besides, it may be possible that they can get a replacement game against another school. Maybe even Indiana...again, because their game vs. Purdue looks like it could be canceled. Or they may switch some things around, I hear they may say: Minnesota goes to play OSU, and Nebraska, who was to be Minn's opponent would play Indiana because Purdue cancels, and they avoid a rematch that way.
They can do it. It was just an arbitrary ad hoc made up rule to begin with....so there is no reason to think they could not change it. Besides, it may be possible that they can get a replacement game against another school. Maybe even Indiana...again, because their game vs. Purdue looks like it could be canceled. Or they may switch some things around, I hear they may say: Minnesota goes to play OSU, and Nebraska, who was to be Minn's opponent would play Indiana because Purdue cancels, and they avoid a rematch that way.
Of course they can do it. However, you miss my point.
Everybody agreed and knew the rules going in....changing the rules at this point would be a rinky dink move.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. -
They can do it. It was just an arbitrary ad hoc made up rule to begin with....so there is no reason to think they could not change it. Besides, it may be possible that they can get a replacement game against another school. Maybe even Indiana...again, because their game vs. Purdue looks like it could be canceled. Or they may switch some things around, I hear they may say: Minnesota goes to play OSU, and Nebraska, who was to be Minn's opponent would play Indiana because Purdue cancels, and they avoid a rematch that way.
Of course they can do it. However, you miss my point.
Everybody agreed and knew the rules going in....changing the rules at this point would be a rinky dink move.
Of course they can do it. However, you miss my point.
Everybody agreed and knew the rules going in....changing the rules at this point would be a rinky dink move.
Well, like I said, they may just change some games around to get in enough games....which college football has been doing all year.
Florida's path to get in? Beat Alabama.
-
They can do it. It was just an arbitrary ad hoc made up rule to begin with....so there is no reason to think they could not change it. Besides, it may be possible that they can get a replacement game against another school. Maybe even Indiana...again, because their game vs. Purdue looks like it could be canceled. Or they may switch some things around, I hear they may say: Minnesota goes to play OSU, and Nebraska, who was to be Minn's opponent would play Indiana because Purdue cancels, and they avoid a rematch that way.
Of course they can do it. However, you miss my point.
Everybody agreed and knew the rules going in....changing the rules at this point would be a rinky dink move.
Of course they can do it. However, you miss my point.
Everybody agreed and knew the rules going in....changing the rules at this point would be a rinky dink move.
Well, I guess, the Big Ten is rinky dink
They eliminated the 6 game rule, like we all knew they would
-
Of course they can do it. However, you miss my point.
Everybody agreed and knew the rules going in....changing the rules at this point would be a rinky dink move.
Well, I guess, the Big Ten is rinky dink
They eliminated the 6 game rule, like we all knew they would
Well, I guess, the Big Ten is rinky dink
They eliminated the 6 game rule, like we all knew they would
I would still like them to play another game, but I guess perhaps the only possibility was another match with Indiana....and they thought that was even more rinky dink...and I would agree.
At this point, all the other Big Ten games are still on schedule, except OSU/Mich....and Indiana/Purdue...who apparently had to shut things down. These game still on:
SATURDAY, DECEMBER 12
TIME (ET) MATCHUP TV LINKS 12:00 PM Rutgers @ Maryland Tickets » 12:00 PM Minnesota @ Nebraska Tickets » 12:00 PM Illinois @ #14 Northwestern 
Tickets » 3:30 PM Michigan State @ Penn State 
Tickets » 3:30 PM Wisconsin @ #16 Iowa Tickets » -
-
At 2-4 wishagin is done for the year. Will they get rid of Harbut or not?
-
At 2-4 wishagin is done for the year. Will they get rid of Harbut or not?
Maybe the Lions will want him. He was actually a better pro coach.
-
At 2-4 wishagin is done for the year. Will they get rid of Harbut or not?
Maybe the Lions will want him. He was actually a better pro coach.
Maybe the Lions will want him. He was actually a better pro coach.
He did coach Stanford pretty well for 1 year. And had 2 good years at San Diego
-
Maybe the Lions will want him. He was actually a better pro coach.
He did coach Stanford pretty well for 1 year. And had 2 good years at San Diego
He did coach Stanford pretty well for 1 year. And had 2 good years at San Diego
Actually he had a pretty good record at Michigan. 47 -18 before this season (.723 av.). That would be successful most anywhere else. Granted the couldn't beat the Buckeyes and went 1-4 in bowls.
-
He did coach Stanford pretty well for 1 year. And had 2 good years at San Diego
Actually he had a pretty good record at Michigan. 47 -18 before this season (.723 av.). That would be successful most anywhere else. Granted the couldn't beat the Buckeyes and went 1-4 in bowls.
Actually he had a pretty good record at Michigan. 47 -18 before this season (.723 av.). That would be successful most anywhere else. Granted the couldn't beat the Buckeyes and went 1-4 in bowls.
47-18 is not a good record at that school. And losing to your rival every year is even worse
-
Actually he had a pretty good record at Michigan. 47 -18 before this season (.723 av.). That would be successful most anywhere else. Granted the couldn't beat the Buckeyes and went 1-4 in bowls.
47-18 is not a good record at that school. And losing to your rival every year is even worse
47-18 is not a good record at that school. And losing to your rival every year is even worse
the loosing to the Buckeyes every year hurt him the worst. The .723 is not much off of their historical average. BTW I am a Buckeye fan.
-
He did coach Stanford pretty well for 1 year. And had 2 good years at San Diego
Actually he had a pretty good record at Michigan. 47 -18 before this season (.723 av.). That would be successful most anywhere else. Granted the couldn't beat the Buckeyes and went 1-4 in bowls.
Actually he had a pretty good record at Michigan. 47 -18 before this season (.723 av.). That would be successful most anywhere else. Granted the couldn't beat the Buckeyes and went 1-4 in bowls.
Shades of Jon Cooper.
-
47-18 is not a good record at that school. And losing to your rival every year is even worse
the loosing to the Buckeyes every year hurt him the worst. The .723 is not much off of their historical average. BTW I am a Buckeye fan.
-
Shades of Jon Cooper.
Oh yes couldn't win bowl games and couldn't beat Michigan.
And then Jim Tressel arrived followed shortly by Urban Meyer that problem was solved.
-
-
47-18 is not a good record at that school. And losing to your rival every year is even worse
the loosing to the Buckeyes every year hurt him the worst. The .723 is not much off of their historical average. BTW I am a Buckeye fan.
the loosing to the Buckeyes every year hurt him the worst. The .723 is not much off of their historical average. BTW I am a Buckeye fan.
Losing.
-
Losing.
LOL.....that is a pet peeve of mine that so many people cannot figure how to properly spell such a simple word.
"loosing" to me applies either to slot machines or bowel movements.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login