Skip to content

Of course they won’t play

College Football Forum
28 10 1.1k 1
  • @browns149 said:

    He did coach Stanford pretty well for 1 year. And had 2 good years at San Diego

    Actually he had a pretty good record at Michigan. 47 -18 before this season (.723 av.). That would be successful most anywhere else. Granted the couldn't beat the Buckeyes and went 1-4 in bowls.

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @dusty said:

    Actually he had a pretty good record at Michigan. 47 -18 before this season (.723 av.). That would be successful most anywhere else. Granted the couldn't beat the Buckeyes and went 1-4 in bowls.

    47-18 is not a good record at that school. And losing to your rival every year is even worse

  • @dusty said:

    Actually he had a pretty good record at Michigan. 47 -18 before this season (.723 av.). That would be successful most anywhere else. Granted the couldn't beat the Buckeyes and went 1-4 in bowls.

    47-18 is not a good record at that school. And losing to your rival every year is even worse

    dustyD dusty wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @browns149 said:

    47-18 is not a good record at that school. And losing to your rival every year is even worse

    the loosing to the Buckeyes every year hurt him the worst. The .723 is not much off of their historical average. BTW I am a Buckeye fan.

    Untitledm.png

  • @browns149 said:

    He did coach Stanford pretty well for 1 year. And had 2 good years at San Diego

    Actually he had a pretty good record at Michigan. 47 -18 before this season (.723 av.). That would be successful most anywhere else. Granted the couldn't beat the Buckeyes and went 1-4 in bowls.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @dusty said:

    Actually he had a pretty good record at Michigan. 47 -18 before this season (.723 av.). That would be successful most anywhere else. Granted the couldn't beat the Buckeyes and went 1-4 in bowls.

    Shades of Jon Cooper.

  • @browns149 said:

    47-18 is not a good record at that school. And losing to your rival every year is even worse

    the loosing to the Buckeyes every year hurt him the worst. The .723 is not much off of their historical average. BTW I am a Buckeye fan.

    Untitledm.png

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @dusty said:

    the loosing to the Buckeyes every year hurt him the worst. The .723 is not much off of their historical average. BTW I am a Buckeye fan.

    Untitledm.png

    This was before the season.  As I understand, OSU has now actually overtaken  FMU for top percentage. 

  • @dusty said:

    Actually he had a pretty good record at Michigan. 47 -18 before this season (.723 av.). That would be successful most anywhere else. Granted the couldn't beat the Buckeyes and went 1-4 in bowls.

    Shades of Jon Cooper.

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @the-gipper said:

    Shades of Jon Cooper.

    Oh yes couldn't win bowl games and couldn't beat Michigan.

    And then Jim Tressel arrived followed shortly by Urban Meyer that problem was solved.

  • The Cysko KidT The Cysko Kid wrote on last edited by
    #23

    1600180510-picsay.jpg

  • @browns149 said:

    47-18 is not a good record at that school. And losing to your rival every year is even worse

    the loosing to the Buckeyes every year hurt him the worst. The .723 is not much off of their historical average. BTW I am a Buckeye fan.

    Untitledm.png

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @dusty said:

    the loosing to the Buckeyes every year hurt him the worst. The .723 is not much off of their historical average. BTW I am a Buckeye fan.

    Untitledm.png

    Losing.

  • @dusty said:

    the loosing to the Buckeyes every year hurt him the worst. The .723 is not much off of their historical average. BTW I am a Buckeye fan.

    Untitledm.png

    Losing.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
    #25

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Losing.

    LOL.....that is a pet peeve of mine that so many people cannot figure how to properly spell such a simple word. 

    "loosing"  to me applies either to slot machines or bowel movements. 

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Losing.

    LOL.....that is a pet peeve of mine that so many people cannot figure how to properly spell such a simple word. 

    "loosing"  to me applies either to slot machines or bowel movements. 

    dustyD dusty wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @the-gipper said:

    LOL.....that is a pet peeve of mine that so many people cannot figure how to properly spell such a simple word. 

    "loosing"  to me applies either to slot machines or bowel movements. 

    Yea. Usually I am pickier about getting it right. I blame it on a big thumb on a small phone! 

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Losing.

    LOL.....that is a pet peeve of mine that so many people cannot figure how to properly spell such a simple word. 

    "loosing"  to me applies either to slot machines or bowel movements. 

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @the-gipper said:

    LOL.....that is a pet peeve of mine that so many people cannot figure how to properly spell such a simple word. 

    "loosing"  to me applies either to slot machines or bowel movements 

    “Bowel movements” to me applies to wishagin football 

  • @the-gipper said:

    LOL.....that is a pet peeve of mine that so many people cannot figure how to properly spell such a simple word. 

    "loosing"  to me applies either to slot machines or bowel movements 

    “Bowel movements” to me applies to wishagin football 

    dustyD dusty wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @browns149 said:

    “Bowel movements” to me applies to wishagin football 

    Actually I would like to see Michigan do better. Go to to the final game undefeated. 

    That would make the Buckeyes victory against them even more sweet!