***WILDCARD: Browns AT Steelers Gameday Thread***
-
The only part I am going to respond to (not meaning anything is bad) is the:
Yep, that's all I can do.
I think you missed the point. You are using the potential of the DB and saying injuries (which is obviously a fact that they have had injuries), to say it is an unknown.
But since you are comparing the two teams at present, to be fair and honest, you have to use what the Browns have shown currently. And that is a very low DB field.
If you don't want to do that and just go on potential, then you must also do the same for other teams. In fact, since it would seem to be a foregone conclusion that Jags will take Lawrence, then it would stand to reason that Jags will have the best QB in their division for sure.
You see how that can be construed. There were and still are concerns about how good Greedy is, and Delpit has not played a snap.
The only part I am going to respond to (not meaning anything is bad) is the:
Yep, that's all I can do.
I think you missed the point. You are using the potential of the DB and saying injuries (which is obviously a fact that they have had injuries), to say it is an unknown.
Well, yes...it is an unknown....to me.
But since you are comparing the two teams at present, to be fair and honest, you have to use what the Browns have shown currently. And that is a very low DB field.
OK....somewhat fair......I guess. Comparing our mostly 2d/3rd stringers to their DBs....though I think the Steelers also had some guys out....so I will give you the most honest answer I can give: I don't know how they compare. I will defer to your judgment.
If you don't want to do that and just go on potential, then you must also do the same for other teams. In fact, since it would seem to be a foregone conclusion that Jags will take Lawrence, then it would stand to reason that Jags will have the best QB in their division for sure.
Wait....I thought we were just comparing Browns vs. Steelers rosters. How did the Jags get in here? By the Way....Jags on the verge of hiring Meyer.
You see how that can be construed. There were and still are concerns about how good Greedy is, and Delpit has not played a snap.
Precisely. I don't know how good these guys are going to be. There are concerns about Greedy...but he has shown flashes. And yes, no one saw Delpit. I think he looked pretty good in college....National Champ and all that...but....
-
Pittsburgh Dad.? Maybe really it's Vag.?
-
Vagitron got his wish: 3 Steeler coaches OUT...including the OC.
-
The only part I am going to respond to (not meaning anything is bad) is the:
Yep, that's all I can do.
I think you missed the point. You are using the potential of the DB and saying injuries (which is obviously a fact that they have had injuries), to say it is an unknown.
Well, yes...it is an unknown....to me.
But since you are comparing the two teams at present, to be fair and honest, you have to use what the Browns have shown currently. And that is a very low DB field.
OK....somewhat fair......I guess. Comparing our mostly 2d/3rd stringers to their DBs....though I think the Steelers also had some guys out....so I will give you the most honest answer I can give: I don't know how they compare. I will defer to your judgment.
If you don't want to do that and just go on potential, then you must also do the same for other teams. In fact, since it would seem to be a foregone conclusion that Jags will take Lawrence, then it would stand to reason that Jags will have the best QB in their division for sure.
Wait....I thought we were just comparing Browns vs. Steelers rosters. How did the Jags get in here? By the Way....Jags on the verge of hiring Meyer.
You see how that can be construed. There were and still are concerns about how good Greedy is, and Delpit has not played a snap.
Precisely. I don't know how good these guys are going to be. There are concerns about Greedy...but he has shown flashes. And yes, no one saw Delpit. I think he looked pretty good in college....National Champ and all that...but....
Again, you are not comprehending, whether on purpose or not (I have a feeling it's a bit of both), and it could be my fault I guess.
I am not saying that you have to agree with, or that it is a known to me or anyone else either.
What I am saying is that if you are using the current team of the Browns vs. Steelers (for example Teller), then you are basing that assessment on this past season. So it's only fair to assess vs. Steelers the same way. So sure, there is no question that by potential the Browns DB should improve next year, but if you are going to rate one off of performance, it's disingenuous to cop out to another because it won't fit your narrative or to use not seeing enough, or whatever justification you want to use like that.
And nobody is comparing the Jags to anyone. Just pointing out that by just pointing at potential would give that impression, based on many variables (i.e. draft position, college success, and draft grade). Point being there have been COUNTLESS players who have came into the league with loads of potential, looked GREAT in college, and for a multitude of reasons didn't pan out.
-
Again, you are not comprehending, whether on purpose or not (I have a feeling it's a bit of both), and it could be my fault I guess.
I am not saying that you have to agree with, or that it is a known to me or anyone else either.
What I am saying is that if you are using the current team of the Browns vs. Steelers (for example Teller), then you are basing that assessment on this past season. So it's only fair to assess vs. Steelers the same way. So sure, there is no question that by potential the Browns DB should improve next year, but if you are going to rate one off of performance, it's disingenuous to cop out to another because it won't fit your narrative or to use not seeing enough, or whatever justification you want to use like that.
And nobody is comparing the Jags to anyone. Just pointing out that by just pointing at potential would give that impression, based on many variables (i.e. draft position, college success, and draft grade). Point being there have been COUNTLESS players who have came into the league with loads of potential, looked GREAT in college, and for a multitude of reasons didn't pan out.
Again, you are not comprehending, whether on purpose or not (I have a feeling it's a bit of both), and it could be my fault I guess.
I am not saying that you have to agree with, or that it is a known to me or anyone else either.
What I am saying is that if you are using the current team of the Browns vs. Steelers (for example Teller), then you are basing that assessment on this past season. So it's only fair to assess vs. Steelers the same way. So sure, there is no question that by potential the Browns DB should improve next year, but if you are going to rate one off of performance, it's disingenuous to cop out to another because it won't fit your narrative or to use not seeing enough, or whatever justification you want to use like that.
And nobody is comparing the Jags to anyone. Just pointing out that by just pointing at potential would give that impression, based on many variables (i.e. draft position, college success, and draft grade). Point being there have been COUNTLESS players who have came into the league with loads of potential, looked GREAT in college, and for a multitude of reasons didn't pan out.
I do understand....I am just here doing my own thing.
If that's alright with you. (even if it isn't)
-
Again, you are not comprehending, whether on purpose or not (I have a feeling it's a bit of both), and it could be my fault I guess.
I am not saying that you have to agree with, or that it is a known to me or anyone else either.
What I am saying is that if you are using the current team of the Browns vs. Steelers (for example Teller), then you are basing that assessment on this past season. So it's only fair to assess vs. Steelers the same way. So sure, there is no question that by potential the Browns DB should improve next year, but if you are going to rate one off of performance, it's disingenuous to cop out to another because it won't fit your narrative or to use not seeing enough, or whatever justification you want to use like that.
And nobody is comparing the Jags to anyone. Just pointing out that by just pointing at potential would give that impression, based on many variables (i.e. draft position, college success, and draft grade). Point being there have been COUNTLESS players who have came into the league with loads of potential, looked GREAT in college, and for a multitude of reasons didn't pan out.
I do understand....I am just here doing my own thing.
If that's alright with you. (even if it isn't)
I do understand....I am just here doing my own thing.
If that's alright with you. (even if it isn't)
you really have to do something with that piss yellow
-
I spelled chaos wrong like a dumbass but made this with love
️
-
I spelled chaos wrong like a dumbass but made this with love
️
I spelled chaos wrong like a dumbass but made this with love
️
That’s great! Well done man, and thank you!
-
Some of you need a fucking hobby. How did you all WIN this game but are still up in arms over juju and claypool? Browns players are still talking about it. It's wild.
Annnnnnd i got what i wanted with the Steelers. Randy and Sarrett both gone but i was more concerned with Randy. Super nice guy, terrible OC.
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month) -
I spelled chaos wrong like a dumbass but made this with love
️
I spelled chaos wrong like a dumbass but made this with love
️
Also misspelled "Cocks"...
Pretty cool... but kinda low energy.
Did you consider?
-
Some of you need a fucking hobby. How did you all WIN this game but are still up in arms over juju and claypool? Browns players are still talking about it. It's wild.
Annnnnnd i got what i wanted with the Steelers. Randy and Sarrett both gone but i was more concerned with Randy. Super nice guy, terrible OC.
Some of you need a fucking hobby. How did you all WIN this game but are still up in arms over juju and claypool? Browns players are still talking about it. It's wild.
Annnnnnd i got what i wanted with the Steelers. Randy and Sarrett both gone but i was more concerned with Randy. Super nice guy, terrible OC.
Replies like this are precisely why I made the video
-
Some of you need a fucking hobby. How did you all WIN this game but are still up in arms over juju and claypool? Browns players are still talking about it. It's wild.
Annnnnnd i got what i wanted with the Steelers. Randy and Sarrett both gone but i was more concerned with Randy. Super nice guy, terrible OC.
Replies like this are precisely why I made the video
Replies like this are precisely why I made the video
I'm happy for you. The video didn't make me upset, the video just shows me some of you have the Steelers living in your head rent free 24/7 365. You play the chiefs this weekend and you made this video. Niiiiiiiice
-
-
I think vagitron is chase Claypool
I think vagitron is chase Claypool
I mean you guys made fucking t-shirts with a quote on it. A quote mind you that was taken out of context and done so by design. Do you think Claypool cares about any of this? It's just a weird situation especially when you all are still in the playoffs.
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month) -
Definition of salt
(Entry 1 of 6)
1a: a crystalline compound NaCl that consists of sodium chloride, is abundant in nature, and is used especially to season or preserve food or in industry— called also common salt
b: a substance (such as Glauber's salt) resembling common saltcsalts plural(1): a mineral or saline mixture (such as Epsom salts) used as an aperient or cathartic(2): SMELLING SALTSd: any of various compounds that result from replacement of part or all of the acid hydrogen of an acid by a metal or a group acting like a metal : an ionic crystalline compound2: a container for salt at table —often used in the phrases above the saltand below the salt alluding to the former custom of seating persons of higher rank above and those of lower rank below a saltcellar placed in the middle of a long table3a: an ingredient that gives savor, piquancy, or zest -
Definition of salt
(Entry 1 of 6)
1a: a crystalline compound NaCl that consists of sodium chloride, is abundant in nature, and is used especially to season or preserve food or in industry— called also common salt
b: a substance (such as Glauber's salt) resembling common saltcsalts plural(1): a mineral or saline mixture (such as Epsom salts) used as an aperient or cathartic(2): SMELLING SALTSd: any of various compounds that result from replacement of part or all of the acid hydrogen of an acid by a metal or a group acting like a metal : an ionic crystalline compound2: a container for salt at table —often used in the phrases above the saltand below the salt alluding to the former custom of seating persons of higher rank above and those of lower rank below a saltcellar placed in the middle of a long table3a: an ingredient that gives savor, piquancy, or zestDefinition of salt
(Entry 1 of 6)
1a: a crystalline compound NaCl that consists of sodium chloride, is abundant in nature, and is used especially to season or preserve food or in industry— called also common salt
b: a substance (such as Glauber's salt) resembling common saltcsalts plural(1): a mineral or saline mixture (such as Epsom salts) used as an aperient or cathartic(2): SMELLING SALTSd: any of various compounds that result from replacement of part or all of the acid hydrogen of an acid by a metal or a group acting like a metal : an ionic crystalline compound2: a container for salt at table —often used in the phrases above the saltand below the salt alluding to the former custom of seating persons of higher rank above and those of lower rank below a saltcellar placed in the middle of a long table3a: an ingredient that gives savor, piquancy, or zestIF and it's a big IF I were salty it was the day of the game. I'd also be salty if we didn't get rid of randy at OC. The Steelers deserved to lose that game and they did and i'm the furthest thing from salty about it. We can't win them all and things needed to change. The Browns game and the late season collapse served as a catalyst so while I'd like to still see the Steelers in the playoffs I knew they weren't going far if they didn't play like they did against the colts. I post here because I enjoy some of the people and I like to read about the division. I couldn't give ONE. SINGLE. SHIT. about the browns otherwise and that's a fact. I don't lose sleep over losses, I certainly wouldn't buy t-shirts with quotes from a rival team on it. I definitely wouldn't make a video because that kind sir is the very definition of SALT. I'd grab a mirror and look at it for a bit. lol
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month) -
Some of you need a fucking hobby. How did you all WIN this game but are still up in arms over juju and claypool? Browns players are still talking about it. It's wild.
Annnnnnd i got what i wanted with the Steelers. Randy and Sarrett both gone but i was more concerned with Randy. Super nice guy, terrible OC.
Browns players are still talking about it. It's wild.
They are?
Saw where Claypool had doubled down... that reminds me, I think our trade deal is off... but I haven't seen anything more from the Browns.
Then again... I don't tweet and still have a flip phone...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
They are?
Saw where Claypool had doubled down... that reminds me, I think our trade deal is off... but I haven't seen anything more from the Browns.
Then again... I don't tweet and still have a flip phone...
I hope you at least read twitter. I'm serious when i say it, it's unrivaled for sports coverage but i'm not sure if the Browns have the same quality of reporting as the Steelers and I don't mean that in any type of way. Kareem Hunt is signing helmets, maybe they aren't talking about it now. I hope they aren't for your sake. I sometimes think i need a flip phone as i occasionally have a hard time getting off of mine. Lol. I instead recently upgraded to a iphone 12 pro max, the polar opposite of a flip. ?
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month) -
They are?
Saw where Claypool had doubled down... that reminds me, I think our trade deal is off... but I haven't seen anything more from the Browns.
Then again... I don't tweet and still have a flip phone...
I hope you at least read twitter. I'm serious when i say it, it's unrivaled for sports coverage but i'm not sure if the Browns have the same quality of reporting as the Steelers and I don't mean that in any type of way. Kareem Hunt is signing helmets, maybe they aren't talking about it now. I hope they aren't for your sake. I sometimes think i need a flip phone as i occasionally have a hard time getting off of mine. Lol. I instead recently upgraded to a iphone 12 pro max, the polar opposite of a flip. ?
I hope you at least read twitter.
Nope. I do have an account tho... I think I've sent three tweets in total.
Also have a facebook account covered in cobwebs by now I'd imagine.
They don't even send me "So-and-so has sent you a friend request" emails anymore. Probably think I'm dead.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login