Skip to content

Rodgers for Baker is being speculated by the media. Thoughts on Rodgers with this roster!

Locked The Browns Board
121 31 4.5k 1
  • Rodgers for Baker is being speculated by the media. Thoughts?

    Image  

    ComeonmanC Comeonman wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @gumby73 said:

    Rodgers for Baker is being speculated by the media. Thoughts?

    Lmao

    Watson for Baker. Rodgers for Baker. Next will be Brady for Baker. 

    unless we’re talking Mahomes for Baker and we can make it fit in the cap, I don’t want to hear about it. 

  • @gumby73 said:

    Rodgers for Baker is being speculated by the media. Thoughts?

    Lmao

    Watson for Baker. Rodgers for Baker. Next will be Brady for Baker. 

    unless we’re talking Mahomes for Baker and we can make it fit in the cap, I don’t want to hear about it. 

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @comeonman said:

    Lmao

    Watson for Baker. Rodgers for Baker. Next will be Brady for Baker. 

    unless we’re talking Mahomes for Baker and we can make it fit in the cap, I don’t want to hear about it. 

    Butcher for Baker

    Cobbler for Baker

    Candlestickmaker for Baker.    At least that  one rhymes. 

  • S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #23

    Max Kellerman and Dan Orlovsky had a pretty good debate going on for 10 mins about this on ESPN this morning. 

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
    #24

    How about a baker for Baker?

    BUDDY VALESTRO for Baker trade?

    yeah, this subject is worse than stupid.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddy_Valastro

    image.png.c885224968caa6797d9a499043495a90.png

  • S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #25

    There some big assumptions being made with this proposed trade:

    1. Baker isn’t getting better as a QB.  And will not improve enough to get to and win a super bowl. 

    2. No dollars and cap are being discussed and We can bring in Rodgers without sacrificing any other roster pieces that would make us weaker in other areas although stronger with Rodgers behind Center.   This is where our front office would see this offer (if made) and walk in the other direction. 

    3. The Packers want Baker over Jordan Love.  Do they want another player (maybe) or more picks and in that case what do we do with Baker then...we lose leverage with other teams and sell him off for pennies on the dollar.

    4. Rodgers = Super Bowl.  He’s one 1 SB in his time in GB. 

    5. we would compete with other teams and give up 1s and players we need. 

  • There some big assumptions being made with this proposed trade:

    1. Baker isn’t getting better as a QB.  And will not improve enough to get to and win a super bowl. 

    2. No dollars and cap are being discussed and We can bring in Rodgers without sacrificing any other roster pieces that would make us weaker in other areas although stronger with Rodgers behind Center.   This is where our front office would see this offer (if made) and walk in the other direction. 

    3. The Packers want Baker over Jordan Love.  Do they want another player (maybe) or more picks and in that case what do we do with Baker then...we lose leverage with other teams and sell him off for pennies on the dollar.

    4. Rodgers = Super Bowl.  He’s one 1 SB in his time in GB. 

    5. we would compete with other teams and give up 1s and players we need. 

    nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @sdbacker80 said:

    There some big assumptions being made with this proposed trade:

    1. Baker isn’t getting better as a QB.  And will not improve enough to get to and win a super bowl. 

    2. No dollars and cap are being discussed and We can bring in Rodgers without sacrificing any other roster pieces that would make us weaker in other areas although stronger with Rodgers behind Center.   This is where our front office would see this offer (if made) and walk in the other direction. 

    3. The Packers want Baker over Jordan Love.  Do they want another player (maybe) or more picks and in that case what do we do with Baker then...we lose leverage with other teams and sell him off for pennies on the dollar.

    4. Rodgers = Super Bowl.  He’s one 1 SB in his time in GB. 

    5. we would compete with other teams and give up 1s and players we need. 

    This is nothing more than some trolls trying to start something that really is not there.. Puhleeze!

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #27

    There some big assumptions being made with this proposed trade:

    The bigger assumption is that some  blowhard with a keyboard or a TV camera in front of him invented this as just some Wild Ass Way   to stir conversation.  That particular assumption was correct. 

  • Rodgers is too old.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Rodgers is too old.

    Says a sexagenarian... 😁

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Rodgers is too old.

    Says a sexagenarian... 😁

    nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @tour2ma said:

    Says a sexagenarian... 😁

    Hilarious answer... Had me rollin'

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #30

    I'd do it

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Rodgers is too old.

    Says a sexagenarian... 😁

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @tour2ma said:

    Says a sexagenarian... 😁

    sexagenarian-a man who still wants sex but can no longer get it up due to age limitations. Did I guess right??

  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #32

    Takes one to know one!

  • Cap aside... I'd make the OP's move in a heartbeat.

    Love Baker, but if you want to have a realistic shot at winning it all now, then you want one of the 3 best QBs in the game today under Center.

    Of course... the cap says, "Nope... ain't gonna happen."

    Plus Rogers prolly says, "Nope," as well...

    The "North Coast" ain't the West Coast... or at least near it.

    S SkippinTurtles wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @tour2ma said:

    Cap aside... I'd make the OP's move in a heartbeat.

    Love Baker, but if you want to have a realistic shot at winning it all now, then you want one of the 3 best QBs in the game today under Center.

    Of course... the cap says, "Nope... ain't gonna happen."

    Plus Rogers prolly says, "Nope," as well...

    The "North Coast" ain't the West Coast... or at least near it.

    Brady gently coaxes the cap.  Follow suit.  Dummies.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Says a sexagenarian... 😁

    sexagenarian-a man who still wants sex but can no longer get it up due to age limitations. Did I guess right??

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @texasag1969 said:

    sexagenarian-a man who still wants sex but can no longer get it up due to age limitations. Did I guess right??

    NeverHardBrownsFan? 

  • @tour2ma said:

    Says a sexagenarian... 😁

    sexagenarian-a man who still wants sex but can no longer get it up due to age limitations. Did I guess right??

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by DieHardBrownsFan
    #35

    @texasag1969 said:

    sexagenarian-a man who still wants sex but can no longer get it up due to age limitations. Did I guess right??

    Dude, you're past the sexagenarian age.?  or example, a septuagenarian refers to someone in his or her seventies (age 70 to 79)

  • @texasag1969 said:

    sexagenarian-a man who still wants sex but can no longer get it up due to age limitations. Did I guess right??

    Dude, you're past the sexagenarian age.?  or example, a septuagenarian refers to someone in his or her seventies (age 70 to 79)

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Dude, you're past the sexagenarian age.?  or example, a septuagenarian refers to someone in his or her seventies (age 70 to 79)

    Err.   Or someone born in September 

  • nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #37

    E0rdUnNXsAQrreR.jpg.e410bb16490fb0b3ec2308e8b9ea132d.jpg

  • @texasag1969 said:

    sexagenarian-a man who still wants sex but can no longer get it up due to age limitations. Did I guess right??

    Dude, you're past the sexagenarian age.?  or example, a septuagenarian refers to someone in his or her seventies (age 70 to 79)

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #38

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Dude, you're past the sexagenarian age.?  or example, a septuagenarian refers to someone in his or her seventies (age 70 to 79)

    That's cause they know the different between seppatime and dinnatime (the more formal version of seppatime).??

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #39

    @nickers said:

    E0rdUnNXsAQrreR.jpg.e410bb16490fb0b3ec2308e8b9ea132d.jpg

    You forgot Roy.   Love the outfits:

    97 Vintage Western Wear ideas | vintage western wear, western wear, vintage  western

  • ATOMA ATOM wrote on last edited by
    #40

    FUCK NO  and idiot that thinks this is a good idea needs there head checked