Skip to content

Official Browns at Ravens Game Thread: Nov 28

The Browns Board
553 36 12.0k 1
  • @bob806 said:

    Is it because the Rats are great against the run, or they think they can pass on 'em? 

    Browns passing game subpar. 

    At some point you have to be who you are and Stef hasn't given his guys a snowball's chance in hell to establish the game flow tonight. 

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

    @d-bone said:

    At some point you have to be who you are and Stef hasn't given his guys a snowball's chance in hell to establish the game flow tonight. 

    At some point you have to develop an offense that can be fluid and matchup sound. The Ravens are the best in the NFL against the run, they've done this to everyone.   They do it at the expense of their secondary, with injuries, being questionable.  

    The problem is the Browns 2nd dimension (passing attack) has been so lacking that it makes all the easier attacking downhill early and limiting our RB's.  That's why we started throwing on early downs, something I hope Baker checks to when Balt shows that 5-2 look.  They're professionals too, you have to tip your hat and play the chess match. 

  • @d-bone said:

    At some point you have to be who you are and Stef hasn't given his guys a snowball's chance in hell to establish the game flow tonight. 

    At some point you have to develop an offense that can be fluid and matchup sound. The Ravens are the best in the NFL against the run, they've done this to everyone.   They do it at the expense of their secondary, with injuries, being questionable.  

    The problem is the Browns 2nd dimension (passing attack) has been so lacking that it makes all the easier attacking downhill early and limiting our RB's.  That's why we started throwing on early downs, something I hope Baker checks to when Balt shows that 5-2 look.  They're professionals too, you have to tip your hat and play the chess match. 

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by

    @tiamat63 said:

    The problem is the Browns 2nd dimension (passing attack) has been so lacking that it makes all the easier attacking downhill early and limiting our RB's.  That's why we started throwing on early downs,

    Thank you!

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    Can we run the ball…and play Keenum in the second half?

    Absolutely crazy that he won't hand it off and get the 2 horses going. We're supposed to be the best running team in the NFL, yet our dudes don't know who they are tonight. 

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by

    @d-bone said:

    Absolutely crazy that he won't hand it off and get the 2 horses going. We're supposed to be the best running team in the NFL, yet our dudes don't know who they are tonight. 

    Beat up Baker or kill'em with Keenum?   Nice job  Woods, call a timeout and then get called for 12 on the field. then go rough up Jackson 20 gift yards....

    Mayfiled is not up to NFL QB standards... Too gimpy to play. As Brees said pregame, that shoulder harness is goofing up his mechanics.  FWIW, I'm seriously pissed right now.  

  • @d-bone said:

    At some point you have to be who you are and Stef hasn't given his guys a snowball's chance in hell to establish the game flow tonight. 

    At some point you have to develop an offense that can be fluid and matchup sound. The Ravens are the best in the NFL against the run, they've done this to everyone.   They do it at the expense of their secondary, with injuries, being questionable.  

    The problem is the Browns 2nd dimension (passing attack) has been so lacking that it makes all the easier attacking downhill early and limiting our RB's.  That's why we started throwing on early downs, something I hope Baker checks to when Balt shows that 5-2 look.  They're professionals too, you have to tip your hat and play the chess match. 

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    @tiamat63 said:

    At some point you have to develop an offense that can be fluid and matchup sound. The Ravens are the best in the NFL against the run, they've done this to everyone.   They do it at the expense of their secondary, with injuries, being questionable.  

    The problem is the Browns 2nd dimension (passing attack) has been so lacking that it makes all the easier attacking downhill early and limiting our RB's.  That's why we started throwing on early downs, something I hope Baker checks to when Balt shows that 5-2 look.  They're professionals too, you have to tip your hat and play the chess match. 

    You don't develop an offense during a game. That ship has passed. 

    22 passes / 9 rushes... not good enough and the 3 points on the board points to that. 

  • @d-bone said:

    At some point you have to be who you are and Stef hasn't given his guys a snowball's chance in hell to establish the game flow tonight. 

    At some point you have to develop an offense that can be fluid and matchup sound. The Ravens are the best in the NFL against the run, they've done this to everyone.   They do it at the expense of their secondary, with injuries, being questionable.  

    The problem is the Browns 2nd dimension (passing attack) has been so lacking that it makes all the easier attacking downhill early and limiting our RB's.  That's why we started throwing on early downs, something I hope Baker checks to when Balt shows that 5-2 look.  They're professionals too, you have to tip your hat and play the chess match. 

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by

    @tiamat63 said:

    At some point you have to develop an offense that can be fluid and matchup sound. The Ravens are the best in the NFL against the run, they've done this to everyone.   They do it at the expense of their secondary, with injuries, being questionable.  

    The problem is the Browns 2nd dimension (passing attack) has been so lacking that it makes all the easier attacking downhill early and limiting our RB's.  That's why we started throwing on early downs, something I hope Baker checks to when Balt shows that 5-2 look.  They're professionals too, you have to tip your hat and play the chess match. 

    We are one dimensional now…and the one dimension is #1 in the league.  I’ll take my chances there unless you want to bring in Keenum and actually run an offense 

  • VamboV Vambo wrote on last edited by

    We should sit Chubb and Hunt and let our injured QB pass more...

  • VamboV Vambo wrote on last edited by

    No pressure D at work

  • We should sit Chubb and Hunt and let our injured QB pass more...

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by

    @vambo said:

    We should sit Chubb and Hunt and let our injured QB pass more...

    If you were gonna do that you'd bring in Hunt...to keep the run alive.

  • @vambo said:

    We should sit Chubb and Hunt and let our injured QB pass more...

    If you were gonna do that you'd bring in Hunt...to keep the run alive.

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    @orion said:

    If you were gonna do that you'd bring in Hunt...to keep the run alive.

    whoooosh

  • @tiamat63 said:

    At some point you have to develop an offense that can be fluid and matchup sound. The Ravens are the best in the NFL against the run, they've done this to everyone.   They do it at the expense of their secondary, with injuries, being questionable.  

    The problem is the Browns 2nd dimension (passing attack) has been so lacking that it makes all the easier attacking downhill early and limiting our RB's.  That's why we started throwing on early downs, something I hope Baker checks to when Balt shows that 5-2 look.  They're professionals too, you have to tip your hat and play the chess match. 

    You don't develop an offense during a game. That ship has passed. 

    22 passes / 9 rushes... not good enough and the 3 points on the board points to that. 

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

    @d-bone said:

    You don't develop an offense during a game. That ship has passed. 

    22 passes / 9 rushes... not good enough and the 3 points on the board points to that. 

    You go where the matchup and defense gives you.  If somebody comes out and stacks 8 and 9 in the box, I'm not going to run the ball because "ThAt'S jUsT wHo We ArE".  I'm going to dial up my best man beaters and ask my QB to hit a few throws.  If Baker can't and you just believe you'll run head first Into + count boxes against one of the largest IDL's in the NFL... then you're saying Baker shouldn't be playing.  Because at that point he isn't even a game manager. 

    @sdbacker80 said:

    We are one dimensional now…and the one dimension is #1 in the league.  I’ll take my chances there unless you want to bring in Keenum and actually run an offense 

    See above.  It's intentional by the Ravens to force this team to throw.  No different than teams forcing KC to be patient and run the ball.

  • AxeA Axe wrote on last edited by

    Shit,, even I threw a flag on that..

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by

    Good night

  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    Wow.. what a catch 

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73

    lazy safety floaters again.. find a way

  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by

    Man JOK is setting himself to be a good football player.

  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by

    Another defensive TO

  • @d-bone said:

    You don't develop an offense during a game. That ship has passed. 

    22 passes / 9 rushes... not good enough and the 3 points on the board points to that. 

    You go where the matchup and defense gives you.  If somebody comes out and stacks 8 and 9 in the box, I'm not going to run the ball because "ThAt'S jUsT wHo We ArE".  I'm going to dial up my best man beaters and ask my QB to hit a few throws.  If Baker can't and you just believe you'll run head first Into + count boxes against one of the largest IDL's in the NFL... then you're saying Baker shouldn't be playing.  Because at that point he isn't even a game manager. 

    @sdbacker80 said:

    We are one dimensional now…and the one dimension is #1 in the league.  I’ll take my chances there unless you want to bring in Keenum and actually run an offense 

    See above.  It's intentional by the Ravens to force this team to throw.  No different than teams forcing KC to be patient and run the ball.

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    @tiamat63 said:

    You go where the matchup and defense gives you.  If somebody comes out and stacks 8 and 9 in the box, I'm not going to run the ball because "ThAt'S jUsT wHo We ArE".  I'm going to dial up my best man beaters and ask my QB to hit a few throws.  If Baker can't and you just believe you'll run head first Into + count boxes against one of the largest IDL's in the NFL... then you're saying Baker shouldn't be playing.  Because at that point he isn't even a game manager. 

    Yet Earl Campbell, Walter Payton and all of the other great NFL RBs somehow still got their yards... I guess defenses never stacked the box on them?  

  • AxeA Axe wrote on last edited by

    :::::sigh::::

  • VamboV Vambo wrote on last edited by

    Can we get anyone to cover a receiver?

  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by

    That sucked!