Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Official Browns at Packers Game Thread

Official Browns at Packers Game Thread

The Browns Board
205 28 5.7k
  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #78

    simpler playbook worked well.. Baker is still better on the move..

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
    Dutch OvenD tiamat63T 2 Replies
  • gumby73G gumby73

    simpler playbook worked well.. Baker is still better on the move..

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #79

    @gumby73 said:

    simpler playbook worked well.. Baker is still better on the move..

    Because from the pocket, he's not very good. 

    👍
  • Browns149B Browns149

    @tiamat63 said:

    So you'd have Rookie lacounte out on the perimeter playing CB against Lazard with even more space to get beat?

    I’d rather have ward on adams

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #80

    @browns149 said:

    I’d rather have ward on adams

    @jrb12711 said:

    And I get that. But the browns can also scheme against what they know is coming. And no matter how you slice it, that scheme is fucking stupid. 

    Oh, so you knew Davante was going to be playing at the #3 and not #1, Z or the slot?     Somehow you knew that before the Browns made the call and before the Packers even broke the huddle? What if they ended up getting a motion to that #3 as well?   

    Neither of you are thinking this through.  There are counters to that, but those counters aren't having Lecounte in man-zero.   Just so happens that's what Green Bay caught us in that down.  Chances you see it again are slim to none.

    jrb12711J hoortaH 2 Replies
  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    @browns149 said:

    I’d rather have ward on adams

    @jrb12711 said:

    And I get that. But the browns can also scheme against what they know is coming. And no matter how you slice it, that scheme is fucking stupid. 

    Oh, so you knew Davante was going to be playing at the #3 and not #1, Z or the slot?     Somehow you knew that before the Browns made the call and before the Packers even broke the huddle? What if they ended up getting a motion to that #3 as well?   

    Neither of you are thinking this through.  There are counters to that, but those counters aren't having Lecounte in man-zero.   Just so happens that's what Green Bay caught us in that down.  Chances you see it again are slim to none.

    jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on
    #81

    @tiamat63 said:

    Oh, so you knew Davante was going to be playing at the #3 and not #1, Z or the slot?     Somehow you knew that before the Browns made the call and before the Packers even broke the huddle? What if they ended up getting a motion to that #3 as well?   

    Neither of you are thinking this through.  There are counters to that, but those counters aren't having Lecounte in man-zero.   Just so happens that's what Green Bay caught us in that down.  Chances you see it again are slim to none.

    Which is why I’m telling you that running the blitz and being in man zero in the first place was stupid. Also, yeah maybe I don’t know that but I’m not a defensive coordinator who gets paid millions of dollars to spend weeks not putting practice squad players against a top 3 WR in the league. 

  • gumby73G gumby73

    simpler playbook worked well.. Baker is still better on the move..

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #82

    @gumby73 said:

    simpler playbook worked well.. Baker is still better on the move..

    So is Lamar Jackson.

    That's not a ringing endorsement. 

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #83

    LeCounte gives me less pain than watching MJ Stewart..

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #84

    Holding?

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #85

    Damn, helluva 3rd down conversion!

    👍
  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #86

    Basically a dagger concept, good on the pass pro for allowing that time to develop. 

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #87

    Even if they don't get another first down, that conversion is big. 

    Probably keeps GB from getting another shot this half. 

    Q'aaron looks gimpy. 

  • Browns149B Browns149 wrote on
    #88

    BENCH HIS ASS!!!!!!!!!!!

    "And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve."
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #89

    Well that's not good, again....

  • Browns149B Browns149 wrote on
    #90

    That was one of the worst throws EVER

    "And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve."
  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #91

    let 80 run that down bake.. no S help

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
    Browns149B 1 Reply
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #92

    I can't help thinking that if the Browns do offer Baker an extension, its going to be a low-ball offer that Baker rejects. 

    Browns149B 1 Reply
    ❤
  • gumby73G gumby73

    let 80 run that down bake.. no S help

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on
    #93

    @gumby73 said:

    let 80 run that down bake.. no S help

    It was 10 yards under thrown. Rolling left, throwing across your body. BRILLIANT!!!!

    "And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve."
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

    I can't help thinking that if the Browns do offer Baker an extension, its going to be a low-ball offer that Baker rejects. 

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on
    #94

    @dutch-oven said:

    I can't help thinking that if the Browns do offer Baker an extension, its going to be a low-ball offer that Baker rejects. 

    He’ll be lucky if they offer him anything 

    "And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve."
  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #95

    That RPO is insane.  Only a combo like Rodgers and DA can pull that off.

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #96

    we have a #25?

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
    Dutch OvenD 1 Reply
  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #97

    There really isn't a defensive question that Rodgers and Adams can't answer when they're on.

    I hope you guys complaining realize that now.   

    Browns149B Dutch OvenD 2 Replies
Log in to reply