Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Browns Use Franchise Tag On David Njoku

Browns Use Franchise Tag On David Njoku

The Browns Board
16 13 782 1
  • nickersN nickers wrote on
    #3

    Surprising... But makes sense until someone better comes along... Just a question to the peanut gallery.. Does the TE position garner the same 3 year development period of a WR?... If so Harrison Bryant should be markedly improved...

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on
    #4

    I want to see a fully operational Njoku. Let him loose. He's still only 25. 

    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
    OrionO ATOMA 2 Replies
    👍
  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

    I want to see a fully operational Njoku. Let him loose. He's still only 25. 

    OrionO Orion wrote on
    #5

    @mld-woody said:

    I want to see a fully operational Njoku.

    Right.  10+ millions worth.  Catching & blocking for that price.

    BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
    👍
  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

    I want to see a fully operational Njoku. Let him loose. He's still only 25. 

    ATOMA ATOM wrote on
    #6

    @mld-woody said:

    I want to see a fully operational Njoku. Let him loose. He's still only 25. 

    lets just hope baker doesnt get him killed with over thrown passes

  • Bob806B Bob806 wrote on
    #7

    He has skills, and probably a great work/practice ethic. He clearly has impressed the coaching staff to be franchised, get him the ball more often .

    Karlis Missed
  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on
    #8

    I could be mistaken about this, but I believe a team has to use the franchise or transition tag every year. It's the reason a lot of teams will use it on the kicker to save the salary cap as opposed to franchising a QB, WR, OL would for example. Looking at the Browns (if this is true) Njoku was the most glaring use of the tag for a multitude of reasons. Hooper is restructured or gone, which is fine. Harrison Bryant and Njoku are good receiving threats, but definitely need to focus on adding some good blocking depth in free agency or the draft. 

    I was surprised that the FA tight end market is robust this year: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/tight-end/. I'm guessing there will be a good value pickup there somewhere to snag an experienced guy to shore up the room.

  • jrb12711J jrb12711

    I could be mistaken about this, but I believe a team has to use the franchise or transition tag every year. It's the reason a lot of teams will use it on the kicker to save the salary cap as opposed to franchising a QB, WR, OL would for example. Looking at the Browns (if this is true) Njoku was the most glaring use of the tag for a multitude of reasons. Hooper is restructured or gone, which is fine. Harrison Bryant and Njoku are good receiving threats, but definitely need to focus on adding some good blocking depth in free agency or the draft. 

    I was surprised that the FA tight end market is robust this year: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/tight-end/. I'm guessing there will be a good value pickup there somewhere to snag an experienced guy to shore up the room.

    S SdBacker80 wrote on
    #9

    @jrb12711 said:

    I could be mistaken about this, but I believe a team has to use the franchise or transition tag every year. It's the reason a lot of teams will use it on the kicker to save the salary cap as opposed to franchising a QB, WR, OL would for example. Looking at the Browns (if this is true) Njoku was the most glaring use of the tag for a multitude of reasons. Hooper is restructured or gone, which is fine. Harrison Bryant and Njoku are good receiving threats, but definitely need to focus on adding some good blocking depth in free agency or the draft. 

    I was surprised that the FA tight end market is robust this year: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/tight-end/. I'm guessing there will be a good value pickup there somewhere to snag an experienced guy to shore up the room.

    You do not have to Franchise anyone, in fact, in many years we’ve franchised no one.

    👍
  • S SdBacker80

    @canton-dawg said:

    36 catches, 4 TD’s and 475 yards receiving will get him $10.9 million.

    Kind of wonder how long it will be before Hooper gets cut.
     

    https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2022/03/07/browns-use-franchise-tag-on-david-njoku/
     

    It means that Hooper is gone.

    And I’m really surprised by this move.

    BrownsnMoparB BrownsnMopar wrote on
    #10

    @sdbacker80 said:

    It means that Hooper is gone.

    And I’m really surprised by this move.

    From what I've heard Hooper will cost 13M if the Browns keep him and 11M against the cap if cut. So.....EDIT: Restructure?

    GO BROWNS!!!

  • B BaconHound wrote on
    #11

    I like this better than a 3 year 30 million dollar contract.

    👍
  • B BaconHound

    I like this better than a 3 year 30 million dollar contract.

    S SdBacker80 wrote on
    #12

    @baconhound said:

    I like this better than a 3 year 30 million dollar contract.

    Bingo.  I like the prove it one year deal too. And Actually show us 10-12M a year production and play (yeah I said it) 

    👍
  • S SdBacker80

    @baconhound said:

    I like this better than a 3 year 30 million dollar contract.

    Bingo.  I like the prove it one year deal too. And Actually show us 10-12M a year production and play (yeah I said it) 

    B BaconHound wrote on
    #13

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Bingo.  I like the prove it one year deal too. And Actually show us 10-12M a year production and play (yeah I said it) 

    Being reported they are keeping Hooper, WTF

  • B BaconHound

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Bingo.  I like the prove it one year deal too. And Actually show us 10-12M a year production and play (yeah I said it) 

    Being reported they are keeping Hooper, WTF

    U Unsympathetic wrote on
    #14

    @baconhound said:

    Being reported they are keeping Hooper, WTF

    Hooper's contract is structured in a very specific way.  Odd, but specific.

    For both 2022 and 2023, his cap value is 13.25 and he will count 3.75 in dead money if cut after 6/1.  The real question is if we can find a TE replacement for 9.5 or less. 

    Cutting before 6/1 is an irresponsibly large amount of dead money in both years as well.. so you really should only respond with a WTF if they cut Hooper before 6/1.

    Note that the reason he's 3.75 dead even after 6/1 is they prorated his signing bonus back in 2020; this 3.75 is already on the books through the 2024 season.

    "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
    ❤️
  • S SdBacker80

    @canton-dawg said:

    36 catches, 4 TD’s and 475 yards receiving will get him $10.9 million.

    Kind of wonder how long it will be before Hooper gets cut.
     

    https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2022/03/07/browns-use-franchise-tag-on-david-njoku/
     

    It means that Hooper is gone.

    And I’m really surprised by this move.

    N Neo wrote on
    #15

    @sdbacker80 said:

    It means that Hooper is gone.

    And I’m really surprised by this move.

    I think Hooper is the better TE. I'm surprised by this too.

  • N Neo

    @sdbacker80 said:

    It means that Hooper is gone.

    And I’m really surprised by this move.

    I think Hooper is the better TE. I'm surprised by this too.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #16

    @neo said:

    I think Hooper is the better TE. I'm surprised by this too.

    Are we going to see a lot of two TE sets?   Count me also surprised that they franchised Njoku.  Well if he does well, we can release Hooper in 2023.  

    👍
Log in to reply