Skip to content

Rams star Aaron Donald swings helmet at Bengals during brawl, will he get a suspension?

The Browns Board
21 15 1.3k 1
  • nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Naw he's not white enough....

  • Naw he's not white enough....

    MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @nickers said:

    Naw he's not white enough....

    .... What?

  • @nickers said:

    Naw he's not white enough....

    .... What?

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @mld-woody said:

    .... What?

    Consider the sources of the brilliance on this thread. 

    The very best and brightest. 

  • @mld-woody said:

    .... What?

    Consider the sources of the brilliance on this thread. 

    The very best and brightest. 

    VamboV Vambo wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @dutch-oven said:

    Consider the sources of the brilliance on this thread. 

    The very best and brightest. 

    Well thought out post so much football acumen.

  • @dutch-oven said:

    Consider the sources of the brilliance on this thread. 

    The very best and brightest. 

    Well thought out post so much football acumen.

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @vambo said:

    Well thought out post so much football acumen.

    Thank you for the kind words, Vambo! 

  • @vambo said:

    Well thought out post so much football acumen.

    Thank you for the kind words, Vambo! 

    VamboV Vambo wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @dutch-oven said:

    Thank you for the kind words, Vambo! 

    You're welcome Dutch.

  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by Orion
    #10

    will he get a suspension?

    ...well, first they'll have to jibber-jabber about it for a while.....then they'll pass it off to useless Sue Robinson, useless because nobody listens to what she says....because Roger will appeal after in an effort to get his peepee cut off....oh wait, that's Watson.

    edit:   And was it really wise to match the two superbowl teams together for a joint practice?  With that game still ringing so bad to the loser...

  • runyon27R runyon27 wrote on last edited by runyon27
    #11

    To me the bigger issue is not whether Donald will be suspended due to some technicality of practice vs a game. The bigger issue is how the sports media basically laughed this off as a non-issue but when Garrett did it, he had committed a crime etc. The only difference here is a game vs practice.

  • S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #12

    What does the Media think?

    There is your answer. 

  • To me the bigger issue is not whether Donald will be suspended due to some technicality of practice vs a game. The bigger issue is how the sports media basically laughed this off as a non-issue but when Garrett did it, he had committed a crime etc. The only difference here is a game vs practice.

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @runyon27 said:

    To me the bigger issue is not whether Donald will be suspended due to some technicality of practice vs a game. The bigger issue is how the sports media basically laughed this off as a non-issue but when Garrett did it, he had committed a crime etc. The only difference here is a game vs practice.

    Very strange, indeed. 

    I mean, does a helmet swung in practice hurt less than in a game?

  • @runyon27 said:

    To me the bigger issue is not whether Donald will be suspended due to some technicality of practice vs a game. The bigger issue is how the sports media basically laughed this off as a non-issue but when Garrett did it, he had committed a crime etc. The only difference here is a game vs practice.

    Very strange, indeed. 

    I mean, does a helmet swung in practice hurt less than in a game?

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @dutch-oven said:

    I mean, does a helmet swung in practice hurt less than in a game?

    To me, it's not exactly a 'practice' when there's another team on the other side of the ball.  It's not a game....but it's not just practice either.  

  • U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Hopefully they'll punish him and Araiza together: Make Araiza play DT, make Aaron Donald punt.

    It's no less logical than any other recent NFL punishment..

  • @dutch-oven said:

    I mean, does a helmet swung in practice hurt less than in a game?

    To me, it's not exactly a 'practice' when there's another team on the other side of the ball.  It's not a game....but it's not just practice either.  

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @orion said:

    To me, it's not exactly a 'practice' when there's another team on the other side of the ball.  It's not a game....but it's not just practice either.  

    just another reason the nfl don't want in on the officiating business... they'd almost have to rule on this..if that's their refs being sent out to inter-squad practices?

    losing regular season games won't happen.. But I'm kinda shocked, that Donald won't be majorly fined to one of Roger's fine donation clubs? 

    inter-squad's >can't have nice things 

  • S Silver slayer wrote on last edited by
    #17

    The league is saying it's in practice so they can't and won't do anything. 

    Wait what's that personal conduct policy for??

  • The league is saying it's in practice so they can't and won't do anything. 

    Wait what's that personal conduct policy for??

    NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @silver-slayer said:

    The league is saying it's in practice so they can't and won't do anything. 

    Wait what's that personal conduct policy for??

    Agreed. They can base their punishments on what they see fit, even if a player is found innocent, but they can't punish someone who commited an aggression in plain daylight in front of the cameras. 

    Aaron Donald is becoming a bigger douchebag as years go by. 

    You simply don't swing a helmet, it's not that hard to understand. 

  • The league is saying it's in practice so they can't and won't do anything. 

    Wait what's that personal conduct policy for??

    Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @silver-slayer said:

    The league is saying it's in practice so they can't and won't do anything. 

    Wait what's that personal conduct policy for??

    Right. Apparently the personal conduct policy only applies to off-field stuff. How stupid.

  • @silver-slayer said:

    The league is saying it's in practice so they can't and won't do anything. 

    Wait what's that personal conduct policy for??

    Right. Apparently the personal conduct policy only applies to off-field stuff. How stupid.

    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @bob806 said:

    Right. Apparently the personal conduct policy only applies to off-field stuff. How stupid.

    I have watched the game for a long time.  I can't think of a time where the league stepped in and fined or suspended a player for a training camp brawl.  I see no reason why they should start now.

  • @bob806 said:

    Right. Apparently the personal conduct policy only applies to off-field stuff. How stupid.

    I have watched the game for a long time.  I can't think of a time where the league stepped in and fined or suspended a player for a training camp brawl.  I see no reason why they should start now.

    Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by Bob806
    #21

    @ballpeen said:

    I have watched the game for a long time.  I can't think of a time where the league stepped in and fined or suspended a player for a training camp brawl.  I see no reason why they should start now.

    Ditto. 

    Just surprising given the times we live in. 

    My point is if they're going to intervene for off the field stuff (assaults) then this would ve the time to at least issue a statement