Skip to content

?⬜️??⬜️?Official Gameday Thread Steelers at Browns????⬜️??⬜️?

The Browns Board
243 31 5.5k 1
  • BernieSuperBowl2B BernieSuperBowl2 wrote on last edited by

    Absolutely zero pass rush.

  • S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by

    Let’s make Mitchell more comfortable in the pocket 

  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by

    Flacco and Mitchell have looked like all pros against this defense. There’s really nothing more that needs to be said. 

  • Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by

    For having all these ivy league guys running this team, it is not a smart team at all

  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by

    I’m not sure they blitzed once that whole half. It’s clear as day woods and crew are terrified on being beat over the top and it’s showing. 

  • mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28

    And for your information Cleveland GUARDIANS  4   Chicago WSX  1.  Top 6.   Securely in 1st place now.   🙂

    ......and Beiber dealing.  39-0 with 4 runs.

  • F FALCON7 wrote on last edited by

    The great give it back D...

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by

    recall sending Jacob Phillips in woods only blitz of the night.. D. Harris clocked Phillips..10 yard pass gain.. this front 4 is not getting there

  • @jrb12711 said:

    It’s very obvious woods adjustment this game was not to get beat over the top. Glad we’re getting gashed by arguably the worst rushing attack in the nfl instead. 

    We weren’t attacked here yet.   
     

    Myles looks hurt or disinterested.  
     

    Ward can’t play man coverage 

    F FALCON7 wrote on last edited by

    @sdbacker80 said:

    We weren’t attacked here yet.   
     

    Myles looks hurt or disinterested.  
     

    Ward can’t play man coverage 

    And he's always worse in the 2nd half

  • The Cysko KidT The Cysko Kid wrote on last edited by

    Could the talking heads suckle the steelers any harder?

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    I'm confused...
     
    We're Browns fans expected Jordan Elliot and Taven Bryan to be good or....?
     
     
     
     
  • I'm confused...
     
    We're Browns fans expected Jordan Elliot and Taven Bryan to be good or....?
     
     
     
     
    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by SdBacker80

    @tiamat63 said:

    I'm confused...
     
    We're Browns fans expected Jordan Elliot and Taven Bryan to be good or....?
     
     
     
     

    noted but the issues go well beyond these two

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by

     Give me 'or'... Berry really wants to roll over cap money

  • BernieSuperBowl2B BernieSuperBowl2 wrote on last edited by

    When Clowney's out, they can double team Garrett and we have no pass rush.

    For the umpteenth year in a row, we have a no name bottom 5 linebacking core.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    I'm confused...
     
    We're Browns fans expected Jordan Elliot and Taven Bryan to be good or....?
     
     
     
     

    noted but the issues go well beyond these two

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by tiamat63

    @sdbacker80 said:

    noted but the issues go well beyond these two

    Browns fans wanted the secondary issues cleaned up.  

    In response, Woods has thrown more man coverage out there and "simplified things"... two words you yourself have used.  The man coverage also allows him the ability to try and be more aggressive on early downs to cover up the bad smell produce by our soft IDL he has been saddled with.  Unfortunately there's only so much you can do when you have one of the worst position groups in the NFL at the most exploitable space of the defense.

    I'm not sure how many floodlights one man needs to put up, but I've beat the drum for anybody who would listen - that once we found a team with a patient enough game plan to attack the interior, it would be bad for this defense.     

    But people don't want to read, listen, digest and think... they want to bitch.  Nothing else. 

  • I'm confused...
     
    We're Browns fans expected Jordan Elliot and Taven Bryan to be good or....?
     
     
     
     
    Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on last edited by

    @tiamat63 said:

    I'm confused...
     
    We're Browns fans expected Jordan Elliot and Taven Bryan to be good or....?
     
     
     
     

    Not me.

  • Dick MellonD Dick Mellon wrote on last edited by

    Thankfully, the officials are Steelers fans.

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    noted but the issues go well beyond these two

    Browns fans wanted the secondary issues cleaned up.  

    In response, Woods has thrown more man coverage out there and "simplified things"... two words you yourself have used.  The man coverage also allows him the ability to try and be more aggressive on early downs to cover up the bad smell produce by our soft IDL he has been saddled with.  Unfortunately there's only so much you can do when you have one of the worst position groups in the NFL at the most exploitable space of the defense.

    I'm not sure how many floodlights one man needs to put up, but I've beat the drum for anybody who would listen - that once we found a team with a patient enough game plan to attack the interior, it would be bad for this defense.     

    But people don't want to read, listen, digest and think... they want to bitch.  Nothing else. 

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by SdBacker80

    @tiamat63 said:

    Browns fans wanted the secondary issues cleaned up.  

    In response, Woods has thrown more man coverage out there and "simplified things"... two words you yourself have used.  The man coverage also allows him the ability to try and be more aggressive on early downs to cover up the bad smell produce by our soft IDL he has been saddled with.  Unfortunately there's only so much you can do when you have one of the worst position groups in the NFL at the most exploitable space of the defense.

    I'm sure how many floodlights one man needs to put up, but I've beat the drum for anybody who would listen - that once we found a team with a patient enough game plan to attack the interior, it would be bad for this defense.     

    But people don't want to read, listen, digest and think... they want to bitch.  Nothing else. 

    bottom line
     

    We are 1-1 because of the secondary.

    Keep defending Joe 

  • AxeA Axe wrote on last edited by

    Warren is no joke

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Browns fans wanted the secondary issues cleaned up.  

    In response, Woods has thrown more man coverage out there and "simplified things"... two words you yourself have used.  The man coverage also allows him the ability to try and be more aggressive on early downs to cover up the bad smell produce by our soft IDL he has been saddled with.  Unfortunately there's only so much you can do when you have one of the worst position groups in the NFL at the most exploitable space of the defense.

    I'm sure how many floodlights one man needs to put up, but I've beat the drum for anybody who would listen - that once we found a team with a patient enough game plan to attack the interior, it would be bad for this defense.     

    But people don't want to read, listen, digest and think... they want to bitch.  Nothing else. 

    bottom line
     

    We are 1-1 because of the secondary.

    Keep defending Joe 

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by tiamat63

    @sdbacker80 said:

    bottom line
     

    We are 1-1 because of the secondary.

    Keep defending Joe 

    Are we watching the same game here, bubs?  The secondary has given some, they've won some tonight.   

    We're giving up nearly 6ypc on the interior. 

    Are we on the same page now?