Skip to content

 ?   • The Official Wild Card Weekend Games Thread  •  WEEK 19.  ?

The Browns Board
132 14 2.4k
  • @mjp28 said:

    GAME 1 RESULTS   -   SF  13    SEA  6    and NO picks 4.      Not too bad.

    ~  AND  ~   GAME 2  ~   JAX 8   LAC  11 (W)     Eh,  not even  50/50.      😕

    GAME 3  -  BUF 19 (L)     MIA  (0)  ......  That's right   0 - 19 - 5. good pick  'en  guys.   ZERO  CORRECT.     😆 

    GAME 4. -  17  MIN.    2  NYG    and  4   NO picks.  Well so far it's  NYG  17   MIN  14.  3rd qtr      GOOD LUCK, we'll probably need it !

    ★  Well. WC   ~  GAME 5  ~   we picked  CIN  19   BAL  0  with 4 NO picks again,   that's right  19 to   *ZERO*   again.     Good luck guys,  favorites are due.

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    @mjp28 said:

    ★  Well. WC   ~  GAME 5  ~   we picked  CIN  19   BAL  0  with 4 NO picks again,   that's right  19 to   *ZERO*   again.     Good luck guys,  favorites are due.

    CIN  24   BAL (+7.0)  17  for a big  "kiss your sister tie, a big push" ...... how about that.   

    Good evening everyone,   on to Monday Night Football.        😉

  • we could get fined for not titling as Super Wild Card Weekend... ?

    my hardest pick was not taking the Giants over the Vikes..Welcome to .500 on picks 

    Love the new flow of the Giants offense. Take some notes Stef..

    Ravens looking to get in Bengals head from the start... Bengals were still good enough to get 3 

    Cats 3-0 (wish Natty would have chosen the new white jerseys)  

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by

    @gumby73 said:

    we could get fined for not titling as Super Wild Card Weekend... ?

    my hardest pick was not taking the Giants over the Vikes..Welcome to .500 on picks 

    Love the new flow of the Giants offense. Take some notes Stef..

    Daboll seems to know why QBs like Daniel Jones and Josh Allen are first round draft picks.  When in charge of both those guys, he lets/let them use their strengths (which includes the running ability working in tandem with good vision and passing).  If the Browns brought DeShaun Watson here thinking they can rewire him to be a cement shoe'd Bernie Kosar beating teams/blitzes with quick reads, ideal decisions and precision only - they're in deep shit.  Kosar also had my favorite OC Lindy Infante who had the perfect offensive design for the personnel we had.  He knew they were gonna be blitzing Bernie frequently; and look how equipped Kosar always was for it.  Infante's spread offense at the time used to constantly get RBs/receivers to the hook zones and flats vacated by blitzing LBers.  

    It'll be interesting to see what they can come up with for Watson.  I think Stefanski did a nice job with Brissett even if his play-calling left a lot to be desired at times.  If we have the right people in charge - the playbook will match the personnel and the play-calling will make sense most of the time.  

  • @gumby73 said:

    we could get fined for not titling as Super Wild Card Weekend... ?

    my hardest pick was not taking the Giants over the Vikes..Welcome to .500 on picks 

    Love the new flow of the Giants offense. Take some notes Stef..

    Daboll seems to know why QBs like Daniel Jones and Josh Allen are first round draft picks.  When in charge of both those guys, he lets/let them use their strengths (which includes the running ability working in tandem with good vision and passing).  If the Browns brought DeShaun Watson here thinking they can rewire him to be a cement shoe'd Bernie Kosar beating teams/blitzes with quick reads, ideal decisions and precision only - they're in deep shit.  Kosar also had my favorite OC Lindy Infante who had the perfect offensive design for the personnel we had.  He knew they were gonna be blitzing Bernie frequently; and look how equipped Kosar always was for it.  Infante's spread offense at the time used to constantly get RBs/receivers to the hook zones and flats vacated by blitzing LBers.  

    It'll be interesting to see what they can come up with for Watson.  I think Stefanski did a nice job with Brissett even if his play-calling left a lot to be desired at times.  If we have the right people in charge - the playbook will match the personnel and the play-calling will make sense most of the time.  

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73

    @flugel said:

     It'll be interesting to see what they can come up with for Watson.  I think Stefanski did a nice job with Brissett even if his play-calling left a lot to be desired at times.  If we have the right people in charge - the playbook will match the personnel and the play-calling will make sense most of the time.  

    I loved Infante's coaching kids to become pro's.. It's missed here Hugely

    We have a 2 fold problem..

    1) Watson can extend plays.. All 22 showed looks of our WR's were not aware of this.. ?

    2) Joe Thomas would have fits telling Watson.. "I can block, but I don't know where your going to be back there"  🙂

    edit-- That G-men Statue of Liberty call was a perfectly timed play call. I could view perfect timing & execution in any quarter.. Danny Dimes nailed selling it.. 

  • @gumby73 said:

    we could get fined for not titling as Super Wild Card Weekend... ?

    my hardest pick was not taking the Giants over the Vikes..Welcome to .500 on picks 

    Love the new flow of the Giants offense. Take some notes Stef..

    Daboll seems to know why QBs like Daniel Jones and Josh Allen are first round draft picks.  When in charge of both those guys, he lets/let them use their strengths (which includes the running ability working in tandem with good vision and passing).  If the Browns brought DeShaun Watson here thinking they can rewire him to be a cement shoe'd Bernie Kosar beating teams/blitzes with quick reads, ideal decisions and precision only - they're in deep shit.  Kosar also had my favorite OC Lindy Infante who had the perfect offensive design for the personnel we had.  He knew they were gonna be blitzing Bernie frequently; and look how equipped Kosar always was for it.  Infante's spread offense at the time used to constantly get RBs/receivers to the hook zones and flats vacated by blitzing LBers.  

    It'll be interesting to see what they can come up with for Watson.  I think Stefanski did a nice job with Brissett even if his play-calling left a lot to be desired at times.  If we have the right people in charge - the playbook will match the personnel and the play-calling will make sense most of the time.  

    Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by

    @flugel said:

    Daboll seems to know why QBs like Daniel Jones and Josh Allen are first round draft picks.  When in charge of both those guys, he lets/let them use their strengths (which includes the running ability working in tandem with good vision and passing).  If the Browns brought DeShaun Watson here thinking they can rewire him to be a cement shoe'd Bernie Kosar beating teams/blitzes with quick reads, ideal decisions and precision only - they're in deep shit.  Kosar also had my favorite OC Lindy Infante who had the perfect offensive design for the personnel we had.  He knew they were gonna be blitzing Bernie frequently; and look how equipped Kosar always was for it.  Infante's spread offense at the time used to constantly get RBs/receivers to the hook zones and flats vacated by blitzing LBers.  

    It'll be interesting to see what they can come up with for Watson.  I think Stefanski did a nice job with Brissett even if his play-calling left a lot to be desired at times.  If we have the right people in charge - the playbook will match the personnel and the play-calling will make sense most of the time.  

    Who knows what the Browns were thinking these last 6 DW games. Maybe analyzing DW's strengths/weaknesses with this offensive system? They did seem to want him in the pocket a lot.

    I want to be optimistic but it's hard. These 5 games this weekend, there were some great offensive play designs. Watching it, it's obvious the Browns lack the speedy WR other teams have....but our priority in drafting should be DT & O line, right? 

  • @flugel said:

     It'll be interesting to see what they can come up with for Watson.  I think Stefanski did a nice job with Brissett even if his play-calling left a lot to be desired at times.  If we have the right people in charge - the playbook will match the personnel and the play-calling will make sense most of the time.  

    I loved Infante's coaching kids to become pro's.. It's missed here Hugely

    We have a 2 fold problem..

    1) Watson can extend plays.. All 22 showed looks of our WR's were not aware of this.. ?

    2) Joe Thomas would have fits telling Watson.. "I can block, but I don't know where your going to be back there"  🙂

    edit-- That G-men Statue of Liberty call was a perfectly timed play call. I could view perfect timing & execution in any quarter.. Danny Dimes nailed selling it.. 

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by

    @gumby73 said:

    I loved Infante's coaching kids to become pro's.. It's missed here Hugely

    We have a 2 fold problem..

    1) Watson can extend plays.. All 22 showed looks of our WR's were not aware of this.. ?

    2) Joe Thomas would have fits telling Watson.. "I can block, but I don't know where your going to be back there"  🙂

    edit-- That G-men Statue of Liberty call was a perfectly timed play call. I could view perfect timing & execution in any quarter.. Danny Dimes nailed selling it.. 

    #1 is heavily dependent upon the coaching.  And #2 sounds like it would be a problem if we had a LT that actually moved.  Right now I've renamed the Left Tackle position in Cleveland. Today, I call it Park Place.  All kidding aside Gumbs, those are great points.

  • @mjp28 said:

    ★  Well. WC   ~  GAME 5  ~   we picked  CIN  19   BAL  0  with 4 NO picks again,   that's right  19 to   *ZERO*   again.     Good luck guys,  favorites are due.

    CIN  24   BAL (+7.0)  17  for a big  "kiss your sister tie, a big push" ...... how about that.   

    Good evening everyone,   on to Monday Night Football.        😉

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28

    @mjp28 said:

    CIN  24   BAL (+7.0)  17  for a big  "kiss your sister tie, a big push" ...... how about that.   

    Good evening everyone,   on to Monday Night Football.        😉

    ~  AND   ~   yes on to Monday Night Football.   And in our TBB PICKEM  my pick  ♥︎

    Dallas ♥︎ vs   @Tampa Bay -- -- 2.5 2.5 Mon 01/16 08:15 PM
  • mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    Exciting start,  huh !     😕

  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    Nasty D so far. 

  • U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by

    I don't understand what Tampa Bay is doing with their staff.. the DL coach is the offense run game coordinator; the ILB coach is the offense pass game coordinator.

    They also have as a full-time offense consultant Tom Moore, who's apparently 84 years young.

  • I don't understand what Tampa Bay is doing with their staff.. the DL coach is the offense run game coordinator; the ILB coach is the offense pass game coordinator.

    They also have as a full-time offense consultant Tom Moore, who's apparently 84 years young.

    Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by

    @unsympathetic said:

    I don't understand what Tampa Bay is doing with their staff.. the DL coach is the offense run game coordinator; the ILB coach is the offense pass game coordinator.

    They also have as a full-time offense consultant Tom Moore, who's apparently 84 years young.

    Anti-analytics??

  • Nasty D so far. 

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28

    @d-bone said:

    Nasty D so far. 

    Well  DAL 12   TB  0.   What ?   Yes.

    TB12 throws a RZ INT.   And Dallas misses TWO EPs, not one two.   Never good in a playoff game. 

    ..... edit how much would you bet DAL goes for -2- next ?

  • @d-bone said:

    Nasty D so far. 

    Well  DAL 12   TB  0.   What ?   Yes.

    TB12 throws a RZ INT.   And Dallas misses TWO EPs, not one two.   Never good in a playoff game. 

    ..... edit how much would you bet DAL goes for -2- next ?

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    @mjp28 said:

    Well  DAL 12   TB  0.   What ?   Yes.

    TB12 throws a RZ INT.   And Dallas misses TWO EPs, not one two.   Never good in a playoff game. 

    ..... edit how much would you bet DAL goes for -2- next ?

    McCarthy's face after the 2nd miss was pretty funny! Maher is solid though and I bet he redeems himself somehow.  

  • @mjp28 said:

    ★  Well. WC   ~  GAME 5  ~   we picked  CIN  19   BAL  0  with 4 NO picks again,   that's right  19 to   *ZERO*   again.     Good luck guys,  favorites are due.

    CIN  24   BAL (+7.0)  17  for a big  "kiss your sister tie, a big push" ...... how about that.   

    Good evening everyone,   on to Monday Night Football.        😉

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28

    @mjp28 said:

    CIN  24   BAL (+7.0)  17  for a big  "kiss your sister tie, a big push" ...... how about that.   

    Good evening everyone,   on to Monday Night Football.        😉

    ~  AND  ~  In our little TBB Pickem here this     ~? ? ~    Monday Night Football contest  it's  :

    DAL  11   TB  8   and no picks 4.   So there you have it  .....   😕

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by

    Dallas driving into the red zone again, already up 12-0.

    Could this be Brady's last game?

  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    3!! 

  • mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    A good 2 minute drive by Prescott  ........  make that TD drive.

    BUT are you kidding me. DALLAS  18  TB  0  and now three consecutive missed EPs.   ?????

  • 3!! 

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    @d-bone said:

    3!! 

    Now what instead of 21-0 it's 18-0.   What next ?

  • @d-bone said:

    3!! 

    Now what instead of 21-0 it's 18-0.   What next ?

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    @mjp28 said:

    Now what instead of 21-0 it's 18-0.   What next ?

    Sideline note :   TBrady shutout in first half first time since first NE playoff game  ...... which they won

    Any chance tonight  ?   (I say NO ! )

  • @mjp28 said:

    Now what instead of 21-0 it's 18-0.   What next ?

    Sideline note :   TBrady shutout in first half first time since first NE playoff game  ...... which they won

    Any chance tonight  ?   (I say NO ! )

    Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by

    @mjp28 said:

    Sideline note :   TBrady shutout in first half first time since first NE playoff game  ...... which they won

    Any chance tonight  ?   (I say NO ! )

    Agree. T Bay would need a miracle. 

    Strange how both the Bucs & Rams just fizzled out so fast after SB wins.

  • @mjp28 said:

    Sideline note :   TBrady shutout in first half first time since first NE playoff game  ...... which they won

    Any chance tonight  ?   (I say NO ! )

    Agree. T Bay would need a miracle. 

    Strange how both the Bucs & Rams just fizzled out so fast after SB wins.

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    @bob806 said:

    Agree. T Bay would need a miracle. 

    Strange how both the Bucs & Rams just fizzled out so fast after SB wins.

    Not a great 3 and out start ..... Dallas can just put them away now   BUT   look what's happened recently.