Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Haslams in talks to buy 25% stake in Bucks

Haslams in talks to buy 25% stake in Bucks

The Browns Board
28 11 1.4k 1
  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on
    #21

    I’ll just drop this here as a reminder. . .

    E3D0C1A0-ADE9-4FA5-B592-BFAAB995D303.jpeg

    Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney
  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg

    I’ll just drop this here as a reminder. . .

    E3D0C1A0-ADE9-4FA5-B592-BFAAB995D303.jpeg

    nickersN nickers wrote on
    #22

    @canton-dawg said:

    I’ll just drop this here as a reminder. . .

    E3D0C1A0-ADE9-4FA5-B592-BFAAB995D303.jpeg

    Is it any wonder why the Browns consistently suck?... I say not anymore... The Haslams are total DIP SHITS!

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
  • ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on
    #23

    Why?

    Because it is a soccer team, or is there some story behind Pete Edwards?

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #24

    This should be gold. 

  • OrionO Orion wrote on
    #25

    Isn't the Crew the home team for the Cleveland area fans?  The Bucks, on the other hand, would be a rival of the Cavs.   

    BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
  • OrionO Orion

    Isn't the Crew the home team for the Cleveland area fans?  The Bucks, on the other hand, would be a rival of the Cavs.   

    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on
    #26

    @orion said:

    Isn't the Crew the home team for the Cleveland area fans?  The Bucks, on the other hand, would be a rival of the Cavs.   

    Sure is....been that way for a good while.

    I don't see a problem or any reason why an owner of a team should limit their opportunities in another sport.  I don't see a conflict of interest.

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
  • ballpeenB ballpeen

    @orion said:

    Isn't the Crew the home team for the Cleveland area fans?  The Bucks, on the other hand, would be a rival of the Cavs.   

    Sure is....been that way for a good while.

    I don't see a problem or any reason why an owner of a team should limit their opportunities in another sport.  I don't see a conflict of interest.

    OrionO Orion wrote on
    #27

    @ballpeen said:

    I don't see a problem or any reason why an owner of a team should limit their opportunities in another sport.  I don't see a conflict of interest.

    .......I'm just sayin'.....he's buying into a rival of the home team fans.   If he gets full ownership the Bucks will be wearing polka dot uniforms.

    BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
  • OrionO Orion

    @ballpeen said:

    I don't see a problem or any reason why an owner of a team should limit their opportunities in another sport.  I don't see a conflict of interest.

    .......I'm just sayin'.....he's buying into a rival of the home team fans.   If he gets full ownership the Bucks will be wearing polka dot uniforms.

    sydS syd wrote on
    #28

    @orion said:

    .......I'm just sayin'.....he's buying into a rival of the home team fans.   If he gets full ownership the Bucks will be wearing polka dot uniforms.

    or in let's say 5 years he sells his share's  and uses said money on a new stadium 

Log in to reply