Skip to content

ESPN: How Many Preseason Snaps is Enough?

The Browns Board
27 18 1.7k
  • T Timugen wrote on last edited by Timugen
    #2

    Hey, but the Vikes only kinda sorta about 95% knew who our starter would be until two days ago when it was confirmed.....so I'm sure it was worth it.

    🙄

  • DrunkandstoopidD Drunkandstoopid wrote on last edited by
    #3

    He got a shitload more snaps than last season's starter.

  • He got a shitload more snaps than last season's starter.

    T Timugen wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @drunkandstoopid said:

    He got a shitload more snaps than last season's starter.

    And he got a shitload less snaps than most of the people he's actually going to playing against, which for some strange reason seems to be a bit more relevant.

    Thank you for playing, though.

  • He got a shitload more snaps than last season's starter.

    V Vegasdogg wrote on last edited by Vegasdogg
    #5

    @drunkandstoopid said:

    He got a shitload more snaps than last season's starter.

    He did what? DA was the starter, and he could not compete well enough against the elite teams in the league. Yes, I give you the heartache you feel that "he wasn't given enough time to develop" but he didn't do much with his opportunities follwoing that great 2007. He had an outstanding 2007, and he was the first QB in the Pro Bowl when Brady declined. But he came into 2008 with high expectations and did not do well. I honestly don't believe he was any different at OSU, except that he beat a few teams he shouldn't have. Give him a Joe Flacco position with the Ravens with that D, and I still don't think he is that good. Flacco played on a shit team in college and carried them. DA never did that. So spare me the "he never had a chance" BS. Trust me if Quinn sucks we'll let him know.

  • @drunkandstoopid said:

    He got a shitload more snaps than last season's starter.

    He did what? DA was the starter, and he could not compete well enough against the elite teams in the league. Yes, I give you the heartache you feel that "he wasn't given enough time to develop" but he didn't do much with his opportunities follwoing that great 2007. He had an outstanding 2007, and he was the first QB in the Pro Bowl when Brady declined. But he came into 2008 with high expectations and did not do well. I honestly don't believe he was any different at OSU, except that he beat a few teams he shouldn't have. Give him a Joe Flacco position with the Ravens with that D, and I still don't think he is that good. Flacco played on a shit team in college and carried them. DA never did that. So spare me the "he never had a chance" BS. Trust me if Quinn sucks we'll let him know.

    DrunkandstoopidD Drunkandstoopid wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @vegasdogg said:

    He did what? DA was the starter, and he could not compete well enough against the elite teams in the league. Yes, I give you the heartache you feel that "he wasn't given enough time to develop" but he didn't do much with his opportunities follwoing that great 2007. He had an outstanding 2007, and he was the first QB in the Pro Bowl when Brady declined. But he came into 2008 with high expectations and did not do well. I honestly don't believe he was any different at OSU, except that he beat a few teams he shouldn't have. Give him a Joe Flacco position with the Ravens with that D, and I still don't think he is that good. Flacco played on a shit team in college and carried them. DA never did that. So spare me the "he never had a chance" BS. Trust me if Quinn sucks we'll let him know.

    The apologists are already floating an excuse for Quinn doing poorly. Hopefully he'll do well, but if he doesn't I won't be surprised when people start talking about the "competition" wasting valuable snaps that would have made the difference.

  • @vegasdogg said:

    He did what? DA was the starter, and he could not compete well enough against the elite teams in the league. Yes, I give you the heartache you feel that "he wasn't given enough time to develop" but he didn't do much with his opportunities follwoing that great 2007. He had an outstanding 2007, and he was the first QB in the Pro Bowl when Brady declined. But he came into 2008 with high expectations and did not do well. I honestly don't believe he was any different at OSU, except that he beat a few teams he shouldn't have. Give him a Joe Flacco position with the Ravens with that D, and I still don't think he is that good. Flacco played on a shit team in college and carried them. DA never did that. So spare me the "he never had a chance" BS. Trust me if Quinn sucks we'll let him know.

    The apologists are already floating an excuse for Quinn doing poorly. Hopefully he'll do well, but if he doesn't I won't be surprised when people start talking about the "competition" wasting valuable snaps that would have made the difference.

    V Vegasdogg wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @drunkandstoopid said:

    The apologists are already floating an excuse for Quinn doing poorly.

    Wait, what were the excuses last season when our starter was the lowest rated QB in the league? That he should have kept the job?

  • LumberghL Lumbergh wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @shepwrite said:

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/stor...&id=4462464

    I see, so if Quinn continues his poor play from last year you'll be able to throw the game out.

    better hold onto this article.

  • @drunkandstoopid said:

    The apologists are already floating an excuse for Quinn doing poorly.

    Wait, what were the excuses last season when our starter was the lowest rated QB in the league? That he should have kept the job?

    LumberghL Lumbergh wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @vegasdogg said:

    Wait, what were the excuses last season when our starter was the lowest rated QB in the league? That he should have kept the job?

    if there was a guy on the bench that coulda done any better, you may have had a point.

    but Quinnie was worse.

  • @vegasdogg said:

    Wait, what were the excuses last season when our starter was the lowest rated QB in the league? That he should have kept the job?

    if there was a guy on the bench that coulda done any better, you may have had a point.

    but Quinnie was worse.

    V Vegasdogg wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @lumbergh said:

    if there was a guy on the bench that coulda done any better, you may have had a point.

    If there was a starter (DA) that could have played like the starter you think he is, you wouldn't have to post garbage like this. He didn't and thus opened the door for Quinn. End of story.

  • @drunkandstoopid said:

    The apologists are already floating an excuse for Quinn doing poorly.

    Wait, what were the excuses last season when our starter was the lowest rated QB in the league? That he should have kept the job?

    DrunkandstoopidD Drunkandstoopid wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @vegasdogg said:

    Wait, what were the excuses last season when our starter was the lowest rated QB in the league? That he should have kept the job?

    All's I'm saying is, DA was crucified for his play even though he missed most of preseason, didn't practice 'til 1 week before his first game (had to be inside because he had light sensitivity), played a tougher schedule than what is scheduled the first part of this season, with injuries at several line and receiving positions.... if anyone uses the excuse that BQ isn't doing well because he didn't get enough reps in preseason they're barking up the wrong tree. DA played with the hand he was dealt, BQ has his turn this time around.

  • @vegasdogg said:

    He did what? DA was the starter, and he could not compete well enough against the elite teams in the league. Yes, I give you the heartache you feel that "he wasn't given enough time to develop" but he didn't do much with his opportunities follwoing that great 2007. He had an outstanding 2007, and he was the first QB in the Pro Bowl when Brady declined. But he came into 2008 with high expectations and did not do well. I honestly don't believe he was any different at OSU, except that he beat a few teams he shouldn't have. Give him a Joe Flacco position with the Ravens with that D, and I still don't think he is that good. Flacco played on a shit team in college and carried them. DA never did that. So spare me the "he never had a chance" BS. Trust me if Quinn sucks we'll let him know.

    The apologists are already floating an excuse for Quinn doing poorly. Hopefully he'll do well, but if he doesn't I won't be surprised when people start talking about the "competition" wasting valuable snaps that would have made the difference.

    GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @drunkandstoopid said:

    The apologists are already floating an excuse for Quinn doing poorly. Hopefully he'll do well, but if he doesn't I won't be surprised when people start talking about the "competition" wasting valuable snaps that would have made the difference.

    No excuses needed BQ will do just fine it may take a while for him to develop a rhythm and he is bound to make some rookie like mistakes but unlike DA he likely wont repeat the mistakes over and over again...

    Everyone and their dog thinks we are going to dink and dunk but bq isnt a dinker by nature only by necessity he scans the whole field and if BE gets open or in a one on one BQ will air it out...

  • M mario wrote on last edited by
    #13

    ah Brady's ladies already making excuses for why he will suck. SHUT UP about it. He isn't the guy, let him suck. We'll probably draft in top 5 next draft anyways

  • ah Brady's ladies already making excuses for why he will suck. SHUT UP about it. He isn't the guy, let him suck. We'll probably draft in top 5 next draft anyways

    N NebBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @mario said:

    ah Brady's ladies already making excuses for why he will suck. SHUT UP about it. He isn't the guy, let him suck. We'll probably draft in top 5 next draft anyways

    Oh look, the VAGINA is back. I see you have sand in your crack again.

  • ah Brady's ladies already making excuses for why he will suck. SHUT UP about it. He isn't the guy, let him suck. We'll probably draft in top 5 next draft anyways

    L lemosley01 wrote on last edited by lemosley01
    #15

    @mario said:

    ah Brady's ladies already making excuses for why he will suck. SHUT UP about it. He isn't the guy, let him suck. We'll probably draft in top 5 next draft anyways

    No, Idiot. Some of us are pissed that this 'competition' didn't really prepare either guy. Are you going to stop watching the Browns when your buddy is no longer here? I'd hate to see you leave, you make a great punching bag in the tavern.

    Someone posted yesterday about how teams bring camp QBs so their starters don't throw their arms out. Still, the starters got 70% more snaps than either guy. And I'll bet most of them weren't learning new systems as well.

    Interesting that everyone else in the league seems to think their young starters need all of the reps they can get (Flacco, Stafford, Ryan). Except us.

  • OconReconO OconRecon wrote on last edited by OconRecon
    #16

    Ahhhhhh. It's sooo relaxing knowing we're not heading into a 5 INT game with DA. No yelling at the football. No fits when the helmet doesn't work. Just nice.

    Only those pesky personal fouls while riding the pine to worry about.

    Yes, a good feeling.

    Quinn to win, but all know it's more about minimizing the damage of AP and line play.

  • chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
    #17

    what new system? that was quinns advantage, he already knew the system.

  • what new system? that was quinns advantage, he already knew the system.

    V Vegasdogg wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @choco said:

    what new system? that was quinns advantage, he already knew the system.

    Quinn's only advantage is he's the better QB.

  • R RedDawg wrote on last edited by
    #19

    I think the premise is true. The Browns QB's had too few snaps. I suspect Mangini knew who would win, and that's why he kept saying the seperation would eventually come, and it did indeed happen. However it meant that whomever he started on opening day wouldn't have their very best game.

    The 2 Questions are:

    1.) Was the competition an example of planning for next season, and the second half of this season?

    2.) With having a competition that was settled late, had Mangini already labeled the Vikings game as a likely loss?

    If one answers "Yes" to one or both questions then the competition makes perfect sense. If he's only thinking of the here and now, then it would make him an idiot to screw both QB's with fewer snaps.

    @shepwrite said:

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/stor...&id=4462464
  • what new system? that was quinns advantage, he already knew the system.

    L lemosley01 wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @choco said:

    what new system? that was quinns advantage, he already knew the system.

    When did the Browns hire Charlie Weiss?

    I must have missed him on the sidelines, although I'm not sure how.

    Stop being obtuse.

  • D damajuki wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Tell you what, Manwagoners, when Quinn throws 4 picks in a game, I'll consider listening to you. When Quinn throws a pick 6 to a MIDDLE LINEBACKER, maybe I'll listen to you, when Quinn rifles a pass into triple coverage, I'll think about listening to you. But only then because that's the outstanding play we've become accustomed to from DA that you guys conveniently gloss over in every thread.

    Until then, you're doing nothing but bashing THE CLEVELAND BROWNS STARTING QUARTERBACK.

    Which officially makes you the enemy, in my book.