Skip to content

T.Official ?  - NFL WEEK 11 -  PIT 10 (+1) -at- ★ CLE 13  Game #10 ?  Nov. 19★ "7-3"

The Browns Board
322 34 6.9k 1
  • @tiamat63 said:

    So PJ would somehow be.... Less unwatchable? 

    Steelers defense adjusted.  The offense has adjustments, but needs the QB to be able to execute them. PJ had already shown he isn't that answer. 

    I'm not seeing the offensive adjustments though. Just short passes and runs that go backwards. 

    Agree on PJ

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

    @korsou-dawg said:

    I'm not seeing the offensive adjustments though. Just short passes and runs that go backwards. 

    Agree on PJ

    The point was there are available adjustments.  You don't have the QB who can make them happen. 

  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by

    How the eff?! Where where the eff was everybody?! JFC. 

  • @tiamat63 said:

    So PJ would somehow be.... Less unwatchable? 

    I know, man. I really don't want it, either. But...this isn't ok. We HAVE to be able to run a bit more of the play book, and I think Walker can do that. I could be wrong, hell...I really don't like watching him, but this is impossible. We're literally hoping our defense scores and squandered two drives starting in their territory. 

    Maybe there is no good option. I don't know. 

    bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by

    @jiggins7919 said:

    I know, man. I really don't want it, either. But...this isn't ok. We HAVE to be able to run a bit more of the play book, and I think Walker can do that. I could be wrong, hell...I really don't like watching him, but this is impossible. We're literally hoping our defense scores and squandered two drives starting in their territory. 

    Maybe there is no good option. I don't know. 

    We can’t risk PJs turnover propensity, we need DTR to get a pep talk or something.

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by

    Warren killin us

  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    While this is a good ol' fashioned AFC Central type game, it's also super frustrating to watch. As I type this up 10-7, I have a bad feeling about my next post that will be after the game.

  • RichiswhereR Richiswhere wrote on last edited by

    out LB need to play better

  • @jiggins7919 said:

    I know, man. I really don't want it, either. But...this isn't ok. We HAVE to be able to run a bit more of the play book, and I think Walker can do that. I could be wrong, hell...I really don't like watching him, but this is impossible. We're literally hoping our defense scores and squandered two drives starting in their territory. 

    Maybe there is no good option. I don't know. 

    We can’t risk PJs turnover propensity, we need DTR to get a pep talk or something.

    jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by

    @bbedward said:

    We can’t risk PJs turnover propensity, we need DTR to get a pep talk or something.

    You're probably not wrong. But we're going to come from behind in this game if we win and DTR can't do that. I can promise you everything I own, there's absolutely no way DTR can lead us to victory against the Steelers in the 4th quarter. PJ at least has done it against other teams, despite being lucky. 

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by

    Warren is punking your butts.. FG or nothing please

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by

    Sack leader has been established

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by

    Where is the playcaller Kev from last week???

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

    Taki, get your head out of your ass.  

    PIT playing safe and we keep giving them the lanes by flying upfield.  

    Live and die by the Schwartz. 

  • Where is the playcaller Kev from last week???

    jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by

    @kvoethe said:

    Where is the playcaller Kev from last week???

    I hear ya. I think he's just so limited with what he can call, there's no good choice. We can't run it, so what do you do? I say qb keepers, it's there. 

  • bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by

    Please stop running into a stacked box and throwing behind the LoS

  • @jiggins7919 said:

    I know, man. I really don't want it, either. But...this isn't ok. We HAVE to be able to run a bit more of the play book, and I think Walker can do that. I could be wrong, hell...I really don't like watching him, but this is impossible. We're literally hoping our defense scores and squandered two drives starting in their territory. 

    Maybe there is no good option. I don't know. 

    We can’t risk PJs turnover propensity, we need DTR to get a pep talk or something.

    Korsou DawgK Korsou Dawg wrote on last edited by

    @bbedward said:

    We can’t risk PJs turnover propensity, we need DTR to get a pep talk or something.

    And we better sign a QB tomorrow!

  • @bbedward said:

    We can’t risk PJs turnover propensity, we need DTR to get a pep talk or something.

    And we better sign a QB tomorrow!

    bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by

    @korsou-dawg said:

    And we better sign a QB tomorrow!

    Flacco probably just needs to ink the papers at this point 

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by

    Unwatchable...

  • mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    ~        Just had a fabulous halftime lunch ......

    ...... followed by our BROWNS forgeting the defensive playbook.   UGH.   10-10.   NO  ties today !

  • RichiswhereR Richiswhere wrote on last edited by

    wow another no replay?

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by

    Saw this shitshow coming a mile away...steelers turn it up in the 4th. We are folding like a tent.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

     5 under.  The weakness of cover 2 is flat, but these DBs are aggressively squatting and driving downfield on first moves.   And you don't have the pass pro or QB to attack the dead spots past the corners and outside the safeties.  

     Eventually you'll have to challenge with these seam throws.  But you're terrified of a turnover.  

     It's like trying to parallel park a semi.