Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. ◆2024 ◆ Kansas City Chiefs - versus - San Francisco 49ers ◆ SUPER BOWL LVIII on FEB. 11, 2024. <--▪︎

◆2024 ◆ Kansas City Chiefs - versus - San Francisco 49ers ◆ SUPER BOWL LVIII on FEB. 11, 2024. <--▪︎

The Browns Board
203 16 7.5k 1
  • AxeA Axe

    What a shame.. A head coach too full of himself costs his team their first ever appearance in a Super bowl..

    It's going to be interesting to see how the media spins this..

    nickersN nickers wrote on
    #191

    @axe said:

    What a shame.. A head coach too full of himself costs his team their first ever appearance in a Super bowl..

    It's going to be interesting to see how the media spins this..

    I think Kevin Stefanski sat in for a few plays... LOL

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
  • bbedwardB bbedward wrote on
    #192

    Yea some of Campbell’s decisions were bizarre to say the least.

  • bbedwardB bbedward

    Yea some of Campbell’s decisions were bizarre to say the least.

    nickersN nickers wrote on
    #193

    @bbedward said:

    Yea some of Campbell’s decisions were bizarre to say the least.

    I get being aggressive and all.. But at some point.. Except the points and live to play another drive...

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
  • N Neo wrote on
    #194

    Just wondering, at what point does analytics tell them the team with the most points when the clock hits zero at the end of the 4th quarter wins the game?

    Although I don't count what Dan Campbell did as analytics, it was just reckless. Sad, considering he used to play for them and should know what that means to to city of Detroit.

  • N Neo

    Just wondering, at what point does analytics tell them the team with the most points when the clock hits zero at the end of the 4th quarter wins the game?

    Although I don't count what Dan Campbell did as analytics, it was just reckless. Sad, considering he used to play for them and should know what that means to to city of Detroit.

    nickersN nickers wrote on
    #195

    @neo said:

    Just wondering, at what point does analytics tell them the team with the most points when the clock hits zero at the end of the 4th quarter wins the game?

    Although I don't count what Dan Campbell did as analytics, it was just reckless. Sad, considering he used to play for them and should know what that means to to city of Detroit.

    Like I told my brother... I get being aggressive and all... But there's a time to take the points.. They weren't in any do or die situations.. Take the points... you win the game... Campbell out coached himself... That said... I think he's a good man...

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
  • D BoneD D Bone

    Somewhere Brandon Staley is saying "Great calls Dan, I would've done the same thing". 

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #196

    @d-bone said:

    Somewhere Brandon Staley is saying "Great calls Dan, I would've done the same thing". 

     what we already knew..

    Dan Campbell would handle the press conference with class with few regrets

    Brandon Staley would still be telling us "than we don't know anything about ?"   🙂 

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
    👍
  • gumby73G gumby73

    @d-bone said:

    Somewhere Brandon Staley is saying "Great calls Dan, I would've done the same thing". 

     what we already knew..

    Dan Campbell would handle the press conference with class with few regrets

    Brandon Staley would still be telling us "than we don't know anything about ?"   🙂 

    nickersN nickers wrote on
    #197

    @gumby73 said:

     what we already knew..

    Dan Campbell would handle the press conference with class with few regrets

    Brandon Staley would still be telling us "than we don't know anything about ?"   🙂 

    Ironically... Brandon Staley's Parents are my neighbors... Very nice people...

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
    👍
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

    Whoever limps out of the NFC is going to get boat-raced by the Ravens in the Super Bowl 

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on
    #198

    @dutch-oven said:

    Whoever limps out of the NFC is going to get boat-raced by the Ravens in the Super Bowl 

    And yes ....  many of us believed just that  UNTIL .....  the KC Chiefs  vs  SF 49ers  ....  in the  SUPER BOWL 58 !

    Good luck to each team on February 11th.

    Super Bowl 58 Odds
    Team Current Super Bowl Odds Opening Odds
    San Francisco 49ers -120 +900
    Kansas City Chiefs +100 +600
    Baltimore Ravens Eliminated +1800
    Detroit Lions Eliminated +2500
    28 more rows
    GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
    😂
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #199

    Not my best take... ?

    So happy the Ravens will not be adding another Lombardi trophy. 

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

    Not my best take... ?

    So happy the Ravens will not be adding another Lombardi trophy. 

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on
    #200

    @dutch-oven said:

    Not my best take... ?

    So happy the Ravens will not be adding another Lombardi trophy. 

    I think we all learned 1 thing - KC had the most underrated defense and DC.   

    I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
  • FlugelF Flugel

    @dutch-oven said:

    Not my best take... ?

    So happy the Ravens will not be adding another Lombardi trophy. 

    I think we all learned 1 thing - KC had the most underrated defense and DC.   

    nickersN nickers wrote on
    #201

    @flugel said:

    I think we all learned 1 thing - KC had the most underrated defense and DC.   

    I like Spagnuolo to a point... His secondary plays a little loosy goosy for my liking but he gets it done... Can't argue much against the success he's had..

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
  • mjp28M mjp28 wrote on
    #202

    ~  And more betting notes leading up to  ★ SB 58 ★  with more to come I'm sure.  Sports gambling is big business now.

    Betting Trends for Past Super Bowl Winners

    • The AFC has won 7 of the last 11 Super Bowls
    • The AFC’s top seed has advanced to the Super Bowl in 7 of the last 11 seasons
    • The AFC’s No. 2 seed has advanced in 2 of the last 4 seasons
    • 6 of the last 10 NFC teams to play in the Super Bowl were the top seed in the conference
    • The NFC West has sent a team to the Super Bowl in 7 of the last 11 years

    Past Super Bowl Winner Preseason Odds

    • 2022: Kansas City Chiefs +800
    • 2021: Los Angeles Rams +1400
    • 2020: Tampa Bay Buccaneers +1000
    • 2019: Kansas City Chiefs +600  <--▪︎   the 2019 & 2018  the closest thing to  "favorites".
    • 2018: New England Patriots +600. <--▪︎
    • 2017: Philadelphia Eagles +4000  <--▪︎   the 2017  closest thing to a  "longshot".    ( See 2023 CLE also was +4000.  No kidding.)
    GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
  • mjp28M mjp28 wrote on
    #203

    I think it might be good to start with a   clean   page for the   Super Bowl  58  game thread on February 11th.

    This thread to the Super Bowl is about worn out.   🙂

    Sound like a good idea ?     

                  ---◇---

    GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
    👍
Log in to reply