Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Supreme Court won’t review sanctions against Kraken and friend who filed frivolous 2020 election suits

Supreme Court won’t review sanctions against Kraken and friend who filed frivolous 2020 election suits

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
2 Posts 2 Posters 119 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cccjwh cccjwhC Reacting Well Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 5k Posts
    • 627 Reputation
    cccjwhC cccjwh wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Another L for the election deniers.

    Supreme Court won’t review sanctions against pro-Trump lawyers who filed frivolous 2020 election suits | CNN Politics

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to revisit sanctions levied against two pro-Trump attorneys who filed frivolous lawsuits challenging the outcome of the 2020 election in Michigan.

    Sidney Powell and Lin Wood filed separate appeals asking the justices to review sanctions imposed by a US district court in 2021. Though their cases involved several technical arguments, both claimed sanctions would make it less likely for lawyers to take “unpopular” cases to court.

    The Supreme Court denied both appeals without offering any comment on the case.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Jax JaxJ One Year In Posting Machine Very Popular Conversation Starter One Month Later Reacting Well Collaborator Week One Done Dedicated First Post
      • 6k Posts
      • 4k Reputation
      JaxJ Jax wrote on last edited by
      #2

      https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/23/politics/sidney-powell-disciplinary-action-tossed/index.html

      A Texas judge on Thursday dismissed the petition brought by State Bar of Texas’ Commission for Lawyer Discipline alleging that attorney Sidney Powell had violated legal ethics rules with her work on former President Donald Trump’s 2020 election reversal gambits.

      CNN sounds bitter as they try to lead readers into what to think about the decision lol.

      As CNN previously reported, those who have sought disciplinary responses for Trump’s legal allies say the post-election conduct crossed ethical lines into the realm of professional misconduct – and that the tactics were well outside the normal bounds of legal challenges to election procedures. - cnn

      But she was cleared and vindicated on all charges, go figure cnn.

      Should have read: Powell fully vindicated after Bidens presidency over extended it's powers to politically prosecute and persecute any opposition, using the corrupt justice system to punish Trump supporters by any means necessary. Wasting taxpayers time and money all the while dodging the truth.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply

      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

      Register Login
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      Theme
      • System
      • Light
      • Dark
      The Browns Board Terms Privacy

      The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Forums
      • Recent
      • Popular
      • Users
      • Donate