Skip to content

In Case You Aren't Depressed Enough

The Browns Board
39 22 2.5k
  • S shepwrite wrote on last edited by shepwrite
    #1
  • G grimmreaper3 wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Obviously he's gay, honing in on how well Quinn's built. And because he is a dirty sodomite, he shall be eternally damned.

    Two birds, one stone.

  • G grimmreaper3 wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Certainly hope so. Mild snark is really all I can contribute, as my football knowledge is... ah... lacking.

  • V Vegasdogg wrote on last edited by Vegasdogg
    #4

    Meh. Simple numbers hocus pocus. Show me the QBs that got bencher after 6 starts no longer in the league. Nice how he compares them to QBs who actually showed something.

  • PlaygroundLegendP PlaygroundLegend wrote on last edited by
    #5

    GREAT article... That article pretty much somes up what ive been trying to say for the last three weeks....

    no one listens....

  • TheClevelandSoundT TheClevelandSound wrote on last edited by
    #6

    someone should seriously show this to Mangini. SERIOUSLY.

  • someone should seriously show this to Mangini. SERIOUSLY.

    LumberghL Lumbergh wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @theclevelandsound said:

    someone should seriously show this to Mangini. SERIOUSLY.

    Garbage time statistics are something for BQ Nation and Stat Queers to ponder, not NFL head coaches.

  • TheClevelandSoundT TheClevelandSound wrote on last edited by
    #8

    i dont care. this article makes more sense to me than the big bang theory.

  • LumberghL Lumbergh wrote on last edited by
    #9

    Anderson "didn't even have a good game" vs the Seahawks in 2007 when he threw for 364 yards and won in overtime vs the NFC West champs......

    interesting.

    And I've got an answer for this question

    "If we’re building for the future, I’d love to know what the blueprint looks like. Coach Mangini… any clues? Please?"

    Hey Quinn lover, here's your first clue...... QUINNIE JUST GOT YANKED FOR #3. How's that for a clue to the blueprint?

  • i dont care. this article makes more sense to me than the big bang theory.

    LumberghL Lumbergh wrote on last edited by Lumbergh
    #10

    @theclevelandsound said:

    i dont care. this article makes more sense to me than the big bang theory.

    You are now a member of BQueer Nation. Congratulations.

    Your Brada Kappa Queera name is lotion boy.

  • @theclevelandsound said:

    i dont care. this article makes more sense to me than the big bang theory.

    You are now a member of BQueer Nation. Congratulations.

    Your Brada Kappa Queera name is lotion boy.

    A Adz1987 wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @lumbergh said:

    You are now a member of BQueer Nation. Congratulations.

    Your Brada Kappa Queera name is lotion boy.

    Why are you a 'Quinn Fag' when as a fan, all you want is your team to give its number 1 draft QB more than 3 season games? Thats not being a fag, it's being sensible, give the guy a go. That piece just proved through statistics how certain QB's have improved after terrible starts. Also, like the writer commented, a lot of those players were on decent teams with lots of talent surrounding them. Quinn is on a terrible team, with a terrible defence, and vanilla playcalling.

    So how about this in future, when you can't respond with a clear and concise argument; Instead of calling people 'Quinn Fags' when they want a number 1 draft choice to be given a good few games to play, appreciate how that could well be a valid argument, and shut the f*ck up.

  • @lumbergh said:

    You are now a member of BQueer Nation. Congratulations.

    Your Brada Kappa Queera name is lotion boy.

    Why are you a 'Quinn Fag' when as a fan, all you want is your team to give its number 1 draft QB more than 3 season games? Thats not being a fag, it's being sensible, give the guy a go. That piece just proved through statistics how certain QB's have improved after terrible starts. Also, like the writer commented, a lot of those players were on decent teams with lots of talent surrounding them. Quinn is on a terrible team, with a terrible defence, and vanilla playcalling.

    So how about this in future, when you can't respond with a clear and concise argument; Instead of calling people 'Quinn Fags' when they want a number 1 draft choice to be given a good few games to play, appreciate how that could well be a valid argument, and shut the f*ck up.

    G grimmreaper3 wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @adz1987 said:

    Why are you a 'Quinn Fag' when as a fan, all you want is your team to give its number 1 draft QB more than 3 season games? Thats not being a fag, it's being sensible, give the guy a go. That piece just proved through statistics how certain QB's have improved after terrible starts. Also, like the writer commented, a lot of those players were on decent teams with lots of talent surrounding them. Quinn is on a terrible team, with a terrible defence, and vanilla playcalling.

    So how about this in future, when you can't respond with a clear and concise argument; Instead of calling people 'Quinn Fags' when they want a number 1 draft choice to be given a good few games to play, appreciate how that could well be a valid argument, and shut the f*ck up.

    3oh3_288.jpg

    Don't feed the troll, never feed the troll!

  • @lumbergh said:

    You are now a member of BQueer Nation. Congratulations.

    Your Brada Kappa Queera name is lotion boy.

    Why are you a 'Quinn Fag' when as a fan, all you want is your team to give its number 1 draft QB more than 3 season games? Thats not being a fag, it's being sensible, give the guy a go. That piece just proved through statistics how certain QB's have improved after terrible starts. Also, like the writer commented, a lot of those players were on decent teams with lots of talent surrounding them. Quinn is on a terrible team, with a terrible defence, and vanilla playcalling.

    So how about this in future, when you can't respond with a clear and concise argument; Instead of calling people 'Quinn Fags' when they want a number 1 draft choice to be given a good few games to play, appreciate how that could well be a valid argument, and shut the f*ck up.

    LumberghL Lumbergh wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @adz1987 said:

    Why are you a 'Quinn Fag' when as a fan, all you want is your team to give its number 1 draft QB more than 3 season games?

    He got six games.

  • OconReconO OconRecon wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @shepwrite said:

    http://cle.scout.com/2/905296.html

    O...M...F...G

    Mangini is a tool.

  • @lumbergh said:

    You are now a member of BQueer Nation. Congratulations.

    Your Brada Kappa Queera name is lotion boy.

    Why are you a 'Quinn Fag' when as a fan, all you want is your team to give its number 1 draft QB more than 3 season games? Thats not being a fag, it's being sensible, give the guy a go. That piece just proved through statistics how certain QB's have improved after terrible starts. Also, like the writer commented, a lot of those players were on decent teams with lots of talent surrounding them. Quinn is on a terrible team, with a terrible defence, and vanilla playcalling.

    So how about this in future, when you can't respond with a clear and concise argument; Instead of calling people 'Quinn Fags' when they want a number 1 draft choice to be given a good few games to play, appreciate how that could well be a valid argument, and shut the f*ck up.

    LumberghL Lumbergh wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @adz1987 said:

    Instead of calling people 'Quinn Fags' when they want a number 1 draft choice to be given a good few games to play, appreciate how that could well be a valid argument, and shut the f*ck up.

    if there was actually a valid argument for Quinn in there somewhere then we wouldn't have this Quinn Fag problem.

    but there is no valid argument to support Captain Checkdown.

  • @adz1987 said:

    Why are you a 'Quinn Fag' when as a fan, all you want is your team to give its number 1 draft QB more than 3 season games?

    He got six games.

    A Adz1987 wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @lumbergh said:

    He got six games.

    By '3 season games', I was referring to this 1 season. I'm sorry if that didn't come across in the post.

  • @adz1987 said:

    Instead of calling people 'Quinn Fags' when they want a number 1 draft choice to be given a good few games to play, appreciate how that could well be a valid argument, and shut the f*ck up.

    if there was actually a valid argument for Quinn in there somewhere then we wouldn't have this Quinn Fag problem.

    but there is no valid argument to support Captain Checkdown.

    A Adz1987 wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @lumbergh said:

    if there was actually a valid argument for Quinn in there somewhere then we wouldn't have this Quinn Fag problem.

    but there is no valid argument to support Captain Checkdown.

    1. Read that link.

    2. Watch some ND videos.

    3. Look at his number 1 draft status compared to round 6 of DA (don't give me Tom Brady BS).

    4. Watch the Broncos game from last year.

  • @lumbergh said:

    He got six games.

    By '3 season games', I was referring to this 1 season. I'm sorry if that didn't come across in the post.

    BrownB499B BrownB499 wrote on last edited by BrownB499
    #18

    @adz1987 said:

    By '3 season games', I was referring to this 1 season. I'm sorry if that didn't come across in the post.

    Actually 2 1/2

  • GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by
    #19

    Im all for seeing what bigfoot can do..BQ wasnt cutting it so penguini being the steadfast true to his dignity type of guy benches the maniquinn thinking in his tiny football brain he can tame bigfoots rifle and feeble mind in one foul swoop...we shall see i hope he is right because i cant take another loss....

  • D damajuki wrote on last edited by
    #20
    The 2009 season is meaningless from a win/loss standpoint. So why not play Quinn, remove the tight leash from his neck, and see what we have after 16 games? Maybe we’ll discover that he isn’t any better than what we’ve seen – but at least we’ll know.

    Best quote of the piece. At least we'll know.

    That was my only real hope for this season: finding out about Quinn. Giving the guy a shot to build something, to actually start his career

    Depressing is the word for this year, alright.

    Great thread, shep. Some excellent replies to the OP. Please come back. There's a dearth (yeah, I said it, go look it up) of intelligent football talk recently. We need all the help we can get.