So Who is our Starting QB after the Bye?
-
I think it will be Quinn. Neither will thrive under this offense with rookie receivers, half of an offensive line and a running back with no big-play potential. If I had to pick one for the future, I would want Anderson, but our season is done, might as well give Quinn a real shot.
Metcalf_FTW said:
I think it will be Quinn. Neither will thrive under this offense with rookie receivers, half of an offensive line and a running back with no big-play potential. If I had to pick one for the future, I would want Anderson, but our season is done, might as well give Quinn a real shot.Are you serious? How many more times does Anderson have to prove that he is terrible? There is no excuse for Anderson to play as bad as he has. He can't even complete 50% of his passes. He should never play another down in Cleveland.
-
I think it will be Quinn. Neither will thrive under this offense with rookie receivers, half of an offensive line and a running back with no big-play potential. If I had to pick one for the future, I would want Anderson, but our season is done, might as well give Quinn a real shot.
Metcalf_FTW said:
I think it will be Quinn. Neither will thrive under this offense with rookie receivers, half of an offensive line and a running back with no big-play potential. If I had to pick one for the future, I would want Anderson, but our season is done, might as well give Quinn a real shot.My thoughts, exactly.
-
They will keep BQ under the 70% of snaps. Anderson has played 5 1/2 games, but the offense has been so dreadful that conceivably BQ could still take 70% of the snaps if the O does better under him in the second half (esp. given that we are playing some very weak teams). I wouldn't be surprised to see DA again in at least one game after the bye because of this. Not sure if it'll be Baltimore. Whoever goes out there against them is a sacrificial lamb. I'd almost rather they give BQ snaps during the bye and throw DA out there against Baltimore, then start Quinn the following week against Detroit. That'll give him a start against a weaker opponent and hopefully build some confidence.
-
hope you all get an IQ boost. Its Quinn. End of story. This isnt an argument. Its a fact.
-
It should be Quinn or Ratliff. Don't think it will matter much but DA has done nothing after his first start to warrant starting the rest of the season. I am a big DA backer but he has shit the bed. It is not all his fault but enough of it is to deserve getting benched. Might as well see what BQ can do, not like it will hurt his trade value. Neither Qb has any trade value right now and I almost expected to see DA released after last week.
-
Its gotta be Quinn, right? I'm guessing that with the easier opponents Detroit, Jax, KC, and Oakland on the schedule that he will win 2 or 3 games and then everyone will feel much better about him. He'll either get traded after that or become the starter for next season.
If they really want to avoid the 70% of snaps thing, they can just snap it to Cribbs more often.
-
Zombo said:
I dropped anderson and picked up Quinn on my fantasy team if that's any indication of where I'm headging my bets.Zombo
--yeah, my team has serious QB issues...
Does your league only have bad QBs? Man I know at least 15 free agent QBs in my league that are better than those two quarterbacks...ouch bro.
-
Zombo said:
I have three QBs on my roster. Yes, they all suck, but I like to keep one of the Browns just for posterity's sake. Whatever that means.Zombo
And the rest of the league appreciates the way you operate, Z.
Oh yea, you kicked my butt this week, didn't you?
-
-
Its gotta be Quinn, right? I'm guessing that with the easier opponents Detroit, Jax, KC, and Oakland on the schedule that he will win 2 or 3 games and then everyone will feel much better about him. He'll either get traded after that or become the starter for next season.
If they really want to avoid the 70% of snaps thing, they can just snap it to Cribbs more often.
Its gotta be Quinn, right? I'm guessing that with the easier opponents Detroit, Jax, KC, and Oakland on the schedule that he will win 2 or 3 games and then everyone will feel much better about him. He'll either get traded after that or become the starter for next season.
If they really want to avoid the 70% of snaps thing, they can just snap it to Cribbs more often.
I think the chances of BQ being on the roster next season are greater than the chances of DA being here. I doubt the Browns will want to pay DA 7M+ next year for his level of production.
-
-
Metcalf_FTW said:
I think it will be Quinn. Neither will thrive under this offense with rookie receivers, half of an offensive line and a running back with no big-play potential. If I had to pick one for the future, I would want Anderson, but our season is done, might as well give Quinn a real shot.Are you serious? How many more times does Anderson have to prove that he is terrible? There is no excuse for Anderson to play as bad as he has. He can't even complete 50% of his passes. He should never play another down in Cleveland.
Are you serious? How many more times does Anderson have to prove that he is terrible? There is no excuse for Anderson to play as bad as he has. He can't even complete 50% of his passes. He should never play another down in Cleveland.
Unless he gets picked up by another team who plays us at home. Then I would love to see him play in Cleveland
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login