Skip to content

Marcus Benard promoted

The Browns Board
25 10 2.2k
  • ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #3

    How about adding some info to your posts...who the hell is the guy??

    Some guy with the Browns or some shoe salesman at Sears??

  • BrownIndianB BrownIndian wrote on last edited by
    #4

    The Cleveland Browns promoted rookie linebacker Marcus Benard to the active roster today, moving him up from the practice squad.

    Benard is an undrafted free agent from Jackson State.

    Cut during the Browns' final major roster cutdown, Benard has been on the practice squad all season.

    He played defensive end at Jackson State, but plays outside linebacker for the Browns.

    Meanwhile, the Browns still have another roster vacancy.

    more @: http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Wilson...linebacker.html

  • DestinFunkD DestinFunk wrote on last edited by
    #5

    http://cle.scout.com/a.z?s=149&p=8&amp...amp;nid=4326167

    Ht: 6-2 Wt: 256

    Position: LB

    Date of Birth: 07/26/1985

    Experience: R

    College: Jackson State

    Key member of defensive unit at Jackson State (2007-08) for two years, earning All-SWAC honors as a senior…Logged 80 tackles along with 16 sacks and 22.5 tackles for loss in 2008…Saw action in all 12 games as a junior, racking up 45 tackles and nine sacks…Had 33 tackles and nine sacks in five games for Grand Rapids Community College in 2006 and 43 tackles and 12 sacks in 2005…Plays the piano, organ, guitar, drums and saxophone and was a member of his high school band… Attended Ypsilanti (Mich.) High School.

    The Browns today announced that they have waived LB Marcus Benard, who impressed during the pre-season. The Browns may attempt to re-sign him to the practice squad. (which they did..and now hes on the big one...)

  • ClevelandFanForLifeC ClevelandFanForLife wrote on last edited by
    #6

    you've just been nard-dogged

  • How about adding some info to your posts...who the hell is the guy??

    Some guy with the Browns or some shoe salesman at Sears??

    ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @ballpeen said:

    How about adding some info to your posts...who the hell is the guy??

    Some guy with the Browns or some shoe salesman at Sears??

    Sorry, I assumed you'd been paying attention on the offseason and during preseason games when this guy looked like a stud.

  • D dawgpound3 wrote on last edited by
    #8

    This is really great great news! Benard has serious pass rush skills! His speed when rushing or bull-rushing is unbelievable. He's quick, fast, and agile. He also got some good moves, such as rip, swim. He could be the next James Harrison.

  • DestinFunkD DestinFunk wrote on last edited by
    #9

    yeah its cool..i think he looked good in pre season..but i doubt he will get inserted in a game other than special teams ..maybe im wrong!

  • yeah its cool..i think he looked good in pre season..but i doubt he will get inserted in a game other than special teams ..maybe im wrong!

    D dawgpound3 wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @destinfunk said:

    yeah its cool..i think he looked good in pre season..but i doubt he will get inserted in a game other than special teams ..maybe im wrong!

    Mangini said Bowens would play inside, and Benard would play outside opposite of Wimbley.

  • @destinfunk said:

    yeah its cool..i think he looked good in pre season..but i doubt he will get inserted in a game other than special teams ..maybe im wrong!

    Mangini said Bowens would play inside, and Benard would play outside opposite of Wimbley.

    C CLEVELandMILIDH wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @dawgpound3 said:

    Mangini said Bowens would play inside, and Benard would play outside opposite of Wimbley.

    he didnt say he was going to start at OLB he said he's going to keep playing him at outside just like he is only playing Veikune at ILB so they can learn one position first. It will probably be trusnik at OLB with Maiva at ILB or trusnik inside and Hall outside

  • @dawgpound3 said:

    Mangini said Bowens would play inside, and Benard would play outside opposite of Wimbley.

    he didnt say he was going to start at OLB he said he's going to keep playing him at outside just like he is only playing Veikune at ILB so they can learn one position first. It will probably be trusnik at OLB with Maiva at ILB or trusnik inside and Hall outside

    D dawgpound3 wrote on last edited by
    #12

    nmills said:

    he didnt say he was going to start at OLB he said he's going to keep playing him at outside just like he is only playing Veikune at ILB so they can learn one position first. It will probably be trusnik at OLB with Maiva at ILB or trusnik inside and Hall outside

    I thought it was a rotation. Trusnik/Benard, Wimbley/Bowens

  • nmills said:

    he didnt say he was going to start at OLB he said he's going to keep playing him at outside just like he is only playing Veikune at ILB so they can learn one position first. It will probably be trusnik at OLB with Maiva at ILB or trusnik inside and Hall outside

    I thought it was a rotation. Trusnik/Benard, Wimbley/Bowens

    C CLEVELandMILIDH wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @dawgpound3 said:

    I thought it was a rotation. Trusnik/Benard, Wimbley/Bowens

    wimbley and bowens are for sure OLB and ILB starters, Then Trusnik can play inside or outside, Probably outside since Veikune and Maiva both play inside, then you have Hall, Bernard outside and Castanza im not sure were he plays inside or out. They'll be a rotation but Benard wont start and I dont think he'll get that many reps if any. In the press conference Mangini said he has to find a way to make the gameday roster by contributing on ST's first. That doesnt sound like a guy thats going to get many reps at LB to me.

  • @ballpeen said:

    How about adding some info to your posts...who the hell is the guy??

    Some guy with the Browns or some shoe salesman at Sears??

    Sorry, I assumed you'd been paying attention on the offseason and during preseason games when this guy looked like a stud.

    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @thaak said:

    Sorry, I assumed you'd been paying attention on the offseason and during preseason games when this guy looked like a stud.

    It's not a matter of paying attention, it's a matter of it being 3-4 months ago.

    We have had so many players come and go I don't even try to remember who is who.

  • @thaak said:

    Sorry, I assumed you'd been paying attention on the offseason and during preseason games when this guy looked like a stud.

    It's not a matter of paying attention, it's a matter of it being 3-4 months ago.

    We have had so many players come and go I don't even try to remember who is who.

    ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @ballpeen said:

    It's not a matter of paying attention, it's a matter of it being 3-4 months ago.

    We have had so many players come and go I don't even try to remember who is who.

    That isn't my fault.

  • @ballpeen said:

    It's not a matter of paying attention, it's a matter of it being 3-4 months ago.

    We have had so many players come and go I don't even try to remember who is who.

    That isn't my fault.

    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @thaak said:

    That isn't my fault.

    Sure it is....you obviously read something to say " Bernard promoted"

    My point is why not add some information when you add a thread to the board???

    It's one thing to add a comment to a thread. It's another to start a new thread and not give any information.

  • @thaak said:

    That isn't my fault.

    Sure it is....you obviously read something to say " Bernard promoted"

    My point is why not add some information when you add a thread to the board???

    It's one thing to add a comment to a thread. It's another to start a new thread and not give any information.

    ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @ballpeen said:

    Sure it is....you obviously read something to say " Bernard promoted"

    My point is why not add some information when you add a thread to the board???

    It's one thing to add a comment to a thread. It's another to start a new thread and not give any information.

    Because there was no more information than that. It was a single sentence that said he was promoted.

    It isn't my fault that you don't know/remember who Benard is.

  • @ballpeen said:

    Sure it is....you obviously read something to say " Bernard promoted"

    My point is why not add some information when you add a thread to the board???

    It's one thing to add a comment to a thread. It's another to start a new thread and not give any information.

    Because there was no more information than that. It was a single sentence that said he was promoted.

    It isn't my fault that you don't know/remember who Benard is.

    mopajiM mopaji wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @thaak said:

    Because there was no more information than that. It was a single sentence that said he was promoted.

    It isn't my fault that you don't know/remember who Benard is.

    Most of us don't remember him because he simply didn't and still doesn't matter. If and when he actually contributes then maybe it will be weird if we don't know him but no logical human being scouts an undrafted rookie LB in the second half of a preseason game. On that note, is anybody really excited about this move? This is a non-issue.

  • S Solon16 wrote on last edited by
    #19

    i'm excited...said he looked like our best OLB in the pre-season!

  • i'm excited...said he looked like our best OLB in the pre-season!

    mopajiM mopaji wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @solon16 said:

    i'm excited...said he looked like our best OLB in the pre-season!

    I sort of remember him too and he looked alright considering who he was playing against but I wouldn't get too excited about what looks to be a move made because we have no other option. I hope he's awesome too but I have just never heard of fans getting excited about a practice squad player getting the call to come up. It just seems a little premature.

  • @thaak said:

    Because there was no more information than that. It was a single sentence that said he was promoted.

    It isn't my fault that you don't know/remember who Benard is.

    Most of us don't remember him because he simply didn't and still doesn't matter. If and when he actually contributes then maybe it will be weird if we don't know him but no logical human being scouts an undrafted rookie LB in the second half of a preseason game. On that note, is anybody really excited about this move? This is a non-issue.

    ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @mopaji said:

    Most of us don't remember him because he simply didn't and still doesn't matter. If and when he actually contributes then maybe it will be weird if we don't know him but no logical human being scouts an undrafted rookie LB in the second half of a preseason game. On that note, is anybody really excited about this move? This is a non-issue.

    Then you must not have been paying much attention to what was happening on this board, or in the preseason games.

    I believe he played with the 1's a couple of the preseason games, and looked like a monster in some plays.

    Also, many of the articles regarding the "bubble" players on the OBR and elsewhere (which all ended up on this board in one form or another) had glowing reviews of him.

    I didn't do any extra scouting onf Benard. I simply paid attention to the articles on this message board and the OBR, and when I saw he'd been promoted, I remembered the name and the articles.

    Really not that difficult if you were paying even a remote amount of attention.

  • @solon16 said:

    i'm excited...said he looked like our best OLB in the pre-season!

    I sort of remember him too and he looked alright considering who he was playing against but I wouldn't get too excited about what looks to be a move made because we have no other option. I hope he's awesome too but I have just never heard of fans getting excited about a practice squad player getting the call to come up. It just seems a little premature.

    ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @mopaji said:

    I sort of remember him too and he looked alright considering who he was playing against but I wouldn't get too excited about what looks to be a move made because we have no other option. I hope he's awesome too but I have just never heard of fans getting excited about a practice squad player getting the call to come up. It just seems a little premature.

    It isn't about being excited. Its about seeing if someone that looked like he had some exciting potential can perform or not. Seeing if we have that James Harrison or whatever. That's what's exciting.