That's the point I was trying to make. I'm usually all for protecting the QB. However, when a QB is being chased down, he needs to know when to slide or slip out of bounds. Just ask RG3 or Vivk.
so you're saying it wasn't a cheapshot. okay.
*and it was 4 super bowls in a row
i'd settle just for going to the playoffs for the first time in 13 years
Cheapshot. Should've been a flag... period
please explain how it was a cheapshot and should have been a flag. he didn't hit him helmet to helmet, he didnt hit him after he started sliding...
Seemed like Alonso launched himself just before Hoyer tried to slide.
are defenders not allowed to launch themselves at offensive players that aren't defenseless?
if anything TOUCHED hoyer's head, it might have been alonso's shoulder pads.
the link shows a better angle
except.... he started sliding way too late, and never got hit helmet to helmet. but keep thinking that if it makes ya feel better. 
how'd he cheapshot hoyer? that was a perfectly legitimate hit. hoyer started trying to slide way too late, just like the hit on ej manuel was legit because manuel decided he wanted to try and get an extra 3 yards by running.
doesn't matter if you were impressed with him or not, but with manuel in there @ qb the bills scored 24 points through 3 quarters
Good win for you guys. I can't help but think that if EJ had run out of bounds instead of getting himself hurt by getting an extra 3 yards that Buffalo could have come out of Cleveland with the W, but oh well what can ya do. You guys made plays when you had to and Travis Benjamin absolutely killed us. In the battle of third-string quarterbacks, your guy was superior to ours. Good luck the rest of the year and I hope you guys play the Patriots and kill them.
looks like it's a game, ladies. 10-10
I left you speechless I see.
that was weird. my response went inside your quote instead of below. but my point still stands. he holds several things against the bills despite being without the players i listed and he says 'we did this without xxxx and xxxx' about the browns.
You just played the injury card you told us not to.
2. The fact is: A. The Browns starting QB HAS been out because of injury (Weeden). Now maybe his is not the starting QB when he returns healthy, but he is still unofficially the starting QB.
3. The Browns were without their #1 receiver for 2 games (though not due to injury)
4. The Browns have been playing with their 3rd string ROG...and it showed in a couple of games, especially the Dolphins game.
5. The Browns gave up their #1 RB....ok, to trade, not injury. But the guy we all counted on to be the Browns #1 offensive weapon is not now playing for them.
6. The Browns have played without one of their starting LBs---Sheard, and one of their rotational linemen---Winn
So, you shuffled and dealt, all I did was take the action to the flop.
the only reason i mentioned those injured players was to emphasize the fact that more teams than the browns deal with players being out.
I never did I just said the last 2 games we are a completely different team with Hoyer and Gordon. I just can't let people get away with stupid.
oh. because you were responding to someone trolling that was saying that the browns were going to get 'blowed out' (emmitt smith-style). gotcha
We haven't been "blown out" all year. We have had 4 halftime leads...
We lost to the 3-1 Dolphins, and the defending champ Ravens. Without our best WR...
Bills have won 2 games by a combined 4 points, both at home... And, lost to the Jets... And, it only took 5 interceptions to win a game by 3 pts...
I'm optimistic... not overly, just optimistic...
Don't try to play the injury card. The Bills have played all 4 of their games thus far without their pro bowl free safety and their #1 cornerback.
2 games without their #2 cornerback.
