I told you I will educate you later when I can be more thorough which I cannot be on my phone then you maybe could being obtuse and thickheaded and listenI told you I will educate you later when I can be more thorough which I cannot be on my phone then you maybe could being obtuse and thickheaded and listen
Ok Shep. Er, Gipper
Shmuck off ShmucktardShmuck off Shmucktard
OK Shep Wannabe
Heard some of Brady's presser, evasive as hell. The answer will come Sunday afternoon. The Jags will have to assume he's sandbagging, until proven otherwise.
To those who cannot or do not watch Brady's post-game or weekly interviews, he NEVER says anything.
Don't read too much into this - despite fan's jealously about the Patriots.
Brady and Belichick are kindred spirits. They might not share a toothbrush or sleep in the same bed, but they both have a driving force to succeed.
Hope all you folks want to hope.
When you cheer against somebody else, you have very little self respect and - even - less knowledge about whatever game you rant about.
Women's March Madness:
"The day's biggest cheers came when activists in Las Vegas thanked Senate Democrats, and said that the government shutdown should not end until immigrants brought to the United States as children won legal status."
"We stand in solidarity with the Dreamers and with the senators who are fighting back and saying, they are Americans too", said Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards".
- Both quotes came from an AP article written by Haven Daley and John Locher. Published in the Hartford Courant on January 22, 2018
The government will shut down! We will all die!
WSS
My life is completely out of order!!!!!!
Sometimes - oftentimes? - the government works BEST when it's shut down.
I had missed the last quarter of the game. So did the refs take it in your hand to give the patriots the win. Her usual. As usual
First, Belichick is an average coach.
Then you say Belichick wins only because he has Brady on his team.
Now you say Brady wins because the referees make it SO he wins.
You're sounding pathetic, Gip.
PS Stop trolling, Tommy V. We all know you've been a BB fan since day 1 
Still honked we didn't draft Clay- he wanted to play here.
Agreed, Larry. However, Jr must be tickled pink the 'home team' passed on him. At least they didn't completely blow that draft though. Although not a playmaker / game changer as is a dominating LB, at least Alex Mack proved to be a pretty good NFL player.
Jack Lambert always held a grudge about not being drafted by the 'home team'.
No sure if Roth. thought the same way, but he is another HOF player (Matthews is not, at least at this point), the 'home team' passed on.
However, this doesn't mean the Browns should draft a kid simply because he went to OSU, for example. The above examples are HOF and/or PB players.
I bet he has a Manziel dart board
If he doesn't appreciate his opportunity to coach an NFL team - in Cleveland or anywhere else - he'd have to be a fool. I don't believe he is a fool. Bittersweet, maybe.
Do you support the Browns, or not?
Supporting Hue, basically, is a non-issue.
He will probably keep his job if the team wins a certain number of games next year. He will probably - and, IMHO, should get fired - given a sluggish start next year.
It is incredible that he is still employed, if you ask me.
What does supporting Jackson - or not - have to do with the price of tea in China?
Oprah would be very different than Clinton... Not "the same thing over and over" at all. I know all you guys see is "liberal", but she's pretty far away
Please explain..............................................
Backlash against the 'Hollywood Elite' was clearly in play a couple of Novembers ago.
What demographic watched that Award Show last night, any way? That is a real question, not a rhetorical one.
I could give a rat's butt about Tony Awards, Globe Awards, Oscar Awards, etc. One big country club patting each other on the back.
Deja Vu all over again.
I'm all for Smith or Cousins.
KC would save $17 million in cap space by releasing Smith and the full $22 million if they can trade him before his bonus kicks in.
If we get Smith, we still draft a QB at #1, and he sits 2-4 years.
If we get Cousins (odds are much lower), then we don't HAVE to take a QB at 1 bc Kirk would be our starter for 5+ years possibly. The only benefit to still drafting a QB at 1 would be, if all goes well, we shouldn't have another opportunity to draft this high.
Well, Dorsey certainly knows Smith and he knows the Chiefs' organization.
There has been noise the second half of the season about starting the young QB- Patrick Mahomes. If the organization believes Mahomes is their future QB, I believe they'd give up Smith for a 3rd Rounder. Why keep him around - on the bench - to maintain / create a(nother) QB controversy.
Smith = Gary Danielson.
Kosar = the QB drafted in the first round this year - either at #1 or #6.
The new QB plays Aaron Rodgers to Brett Favre / Garropollo to Brady. - except the new guy stays and plays in a year or two. Smith - even if he is still a top-flight player in a couple of years, certainly cannot sustain like Brady.
Well... Trump started as a joke.
I'd bet on Oprah against a Trump 2nd term But shits weird... Who knows
It is sometimes said that the definition of ignorance, is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome.
If the 'Dem-Heads' refuse to confront reality RE: the last election, they will make the same mistake again. Be it Whinfrey, Warren, etc.
FWIW, Hillary is married to 'The First Black President'. I don't know if an Oprah - in this instance - could, even, equal the number of 'Black' votes Hillary got.
Keep the Hollywood elite on the front burner and keep a Dem President out of the White House.
Before you lose your Sheet let me explain. ? First what would be our first pick a qb and what would we be drafting the hope that the qb will develop. Well let's say Kirk cousins is a free agent because Washington is stupid. Kirk ranks third in qbs the past two years we know he's good and is proven. So they get Kirk. Now we trade number 1 too whom ever for maybe a 123maybe even a 4th or more pick so now we have our qb and can load the team with talent.
It is my knee-jerk reaction - I haven't looked at the evidence one way or the other - that GOOD teams can trade up or trade down. Good teams generally have good organizations and good organizations make good decisions.
Bad teams draft earlier but, somehow, stay bottom feeders, oftentimes because they 'are preyed upon' by good organizations. Multiple picks are great IF you can draft NFL-caliber players. One pick can be more than enough IF you can draft NFL caliber players.
If I were the Browns, I'd stay pat. They need players all over the map and, hopefully, they can find another Clay Matthews / Ozzie Newsome type of draft. They have plenty of picks this year and next (I believe). Chits - alone - can be worthless.
I know it was a different organization but the Browns passed up a goldmine in 1999 (the infamous Ditka trade) and, instead, stayed put to get one year out of Tim Couch.
Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional. The theory of nullification has never been legally upheld by federal courts.[1]
Like Reagan used to say - the States formed the Federal Government, not the other way around.
Thanks for the explicit law, Die, but we both know a State usurping the authority of the Federal Government ain't even going to happen. And I hate to use the word, "Never".
Sounds like a legal Catch-22 to me.
Wolfe comes, I suspect one or both are gone. Berry the more likely.
LeBron would need lots of help with a net worth of only $400 million, and I'd bet a lot of that isn't liquid. Les Wexner (The Limited) with $6 billion is one of two Ohioans with the necessary loot.
Sure thing, Larry. However, LeBron would be a good local, PR, etc. move. Nothing wrong with him being a minority owner with all that he would bring to the table - maybe simply an image improvement for the organization.
PS I just threw out his name. The big hope is that there is a NEW owner.
But Berry and Depo are still on board. Do we expect them to be aufed? Especially if they sign this guy?
Who cares about an internal feud if the 'football' guys actually turn the team and organization around.
It is obvious that Dorsey is, simply, a GM. He does not run the football operations as would a President, etc. However, he's worked with Highsmith and, at least, Wolfe's father, in GB.
PS I'd LOVE to see the team sold.
LeBron and Company????
If something is legal on a federal level, can a state make it illegal?
I am far from - even - being an armchair Attorney, never mind a Constitutional one.
I believe, though, Federal Law trumps States Laws.
Gip can, certainly, answer this question with much more velocity than can I.
If the majority of voters in a state want it, should they have the right to make it into law?
That is a very slippery slope, my friend.
We have a Republic, not a Democracy. Protecting 'minority' views, persuasions, etc. if what America is all about.
I like to see the Federal Drug Laws amended. I do not want to see 'Majority Rule' used as a broad brush.
And it would be safer. WSS
I have, unfortunately known of a few local kids - one of which I coached in baseball and had wonderful parents - passed away via a struggle with Heroine
Can't help but believe he -and many, many others - would be alive if the drug was sold 'over the counter' and fully regulated.
Of course one can argue - perhaps correctly - that this would encourage others to try it. At the same time, I will argue - it seems quite obvious, actually - that there would be many less deaths if users were to use the drug without it being laced with who-knows-what.
I know the root cause needs to be addressed - it is far from Prohibition, IMHO. However, dealing in parallel with addressing the symptoms makes a lot of sense to me.
Dumb and Dumb and Dumber.
All raise your beer, Scotch, Wine, etc. glasses and celebrate the ongoing modern Prohibition.
Keep throwing good money after bad.
The War on Communism. The War on Terrorism. The War on Poverty. Did any of them work? (rhetorical question).
