@yeahdaisafuturehofer... said:
What is wrong with doing something that wasn't illegal?
People dislike Bonds becuase he did something people with morales and respect for rules didn't do.
People dislike Bonds because his use of PEDs helped him break individual records. Baseball is an individual stat driven game. Doing something that makes people question the validity of records, especially home run records, is the cardinal sin, because in the end baseball is more about individual performance than it is about winning. 61 homeruns in a season used to be a hallowed number, as did 755 career homeruns. Now 61 has been surpassed numerous times and 755 has been toppled. The people who did so were probably using PEDs, bringing their validity into question. That throws baseball fans into a tizzy. They no longer have hallowed homerun numbers, and they're not sure how to react. 73 and 762 will never be fully respected. Nevertheless, they still exist in the books, devaluing 61 and 755. That's the essence of the Bonds hatred. Bonds, along with McGwire and Sosa, stained baseball's religion.
Football is totally different. It's about teams winning and losing. Unlike baseball, which is essentially a series of one-on-one duals between a pitcher and a batter, Football is a pure team sport. Individual statistics are much more difficult to evaluate becuase each individual's statistics are intrinsically tied to the performance of his other teammates. Thus, there are no magic numbers in football other than number of Lombardis and 19-0. PED use is rampant in the league, but no one really cares. It doesn't diminish the game, because the widespread use essentially levels the playing field. The new stats produced eclipses some of the older stats, but that's not really that important.
The ridiculous thing about this ESPN article is that they take two year old news and re-release it during the AFCC, hoping that people will think that it's a new story. It insinuates that the Dr. supplied the Steelers with HGH, but neither states that flat out nor seeks to prove it. It's basically a trumped up piece of fluff designed to make ESPN the story. I think that it damages ESPN's credibility. They've released sensationalist stories late in the playoffs about teams still in the playoffs for two years in a row. The Walsh story was false, and the Steelers story is nothing but years old insinuations. ESPN is swiftly becoming E! SPN.