@playgroundlegend said:
I am here to ask this board a question, a question that has been overasked, and probably over done. This question s about the Browns starting QB Derek Anderson in relation to the Browns second string QB Brady Quinn. Does Derek Anderson really move the ball better than Quinn? If so why and how? If not, why would an individual think so? I am going to delve into some simple statistics, opinions and observations to try and answer this question. My main goal is hopefully for us to come to some sort of median consensus. One way or another. Most of all we want our Browns to win, and everyone has their own opinion as to how we can get that done.
First off I would like to delve into some exaples from Dereks 2009 repitaur. First off, Derek first came in to the Baltimore game and proceeded to throw 3 interceptions and post a 30.9 QBR. Second, Derek came into Cincy and played decent. He put up 269 passing yards, 1 pick, 1 PATD, and a 69 QBR. Lastly Derek came into Buffalo and completed 2 passes for the worst QBR of his carreer.
Now when we look back on what we have seen from Derek (it seems much worse in retrospect) we cn see he hasnt really plated that stellar, not even by his standards.
The fact is, DA and BQ so far have played the exact same amount of games (2.5) and many people believe DA moved the offense better. Lets see:
Derek Anderson
l Pass Attempts:84 l Passes Completed:39 l Comp. Percentage: 46.4% l Total PA Yards: 384 l PA TD: 1 l INT: 5 l QBR: 39
Brady Quinn
l Pass Attempts:74 l Passes Completed:45 l Comp. Percentage: 60.8% l Total PA Yards: 400 l PA TD: 1 l INT:3 l QBR: 62.9
Here are some things that I would like to take from these stats and the game situations:
1. People say DA moved the ball better than Quinn, and yet Quinn threw for more yards than DA, AND more completions DESPITE the fact that the O-coordinator did not let Quinn throw the ball as many times as Derek in the same amount of time.
2. During the first 2 games our offensive line was in trouble and had a crapton of false starts, thus lading to a TON of 3rd and longs.
3. Both QB's suffered from bad WR play. Royal dropped tons of passes from both QB's, as did Edwards and other various receivers.
4. DA has had Massaquoi, Quinn never had a chance to use tha weapon, and he still threw more completions and more yards.
5. Quinn diddnt have Fraley at RG until game 3.
6. Harrison diddnt play the first 2 games.
7. Cribbs got DA better field position, than Quinn (due to the fact he was winded running routes for Quinn) and yet DA did not take advantage as the stats show.
8. Quinn diddnt have as many pass plays called, and on the plays that were called, Braylon wasnt trying (not for DA either) and Cribbs sucked as a #2
All of these things hapened and yet we still disagree. It is my belief we should never have benched Quinn, and that we should start him from here on out. What do you think? Did DA really move our team better? He had more 1st downs which is good! I really like his arm, but did it really help any since Quinn still threw for more yards and complete less passes? But then again Quinn had to deal with more 3rd and longs.
Nicely done! Amazes me people on here and Mancock still have hard ons for 2 for 17 Anderception.