Please note that I never said that the TDs in the KSU and Tennessee game would have been disallowed by penalties (which the KSU kid didn't deserve but got, but Bray did but didn't)--I said that the officials who made those inconsistent calls would have the right to take scores off the board based on their own judgments, which is wrong in my book.
Even on the Black play--do we really want to trust the refs to not only watch the play on the field, but also check the stands to make sure that there are Florida fans where he pointed? And does it have to be a section of (mostly) Florida fans to count as acknowledging them? 50/50? His parents?
Three more objections to the rule:
1. Player Intent--Any rule that allows the refs to decide what the player meant by a celebration is already in trouble. I want rules that address what actually happened on a play, not what happened plus what the referee figures the player was thinking at the time of what happened.
2. Individual referee's reactions--There's always going to be a degree of subjectivity in officiating, but as we saw in the KSU-Tennessee-Florida-insert any other NCAA game, one man's excessive celebration is another man's giddiness and acknowledging his team's fans (becaus that could clearly not happen after the play on the sidelines).
Two examples from this year's games come to mind on this one. The first happened at Tennessee (forget the opponent; maybe Alabama). The opponent runs a play, Tennessee makes a good defensive stop. About three seconds after the play, one of UT's defensive linemen takes his helmet off to adjust something on it (maybe one of the straps or something)--not sure exactly what happened, but the hints were that it was several seconds after the play, he was five yards away from the players celebrating the play, and he immediately started adjusting something on the helmet. This was right in front of the referee. No problem. It was about five yards away from the umpire. Again, no problem. It was about thirty yards from the side judge, who came running in and threw a flag because he clearly took his helmet off to call attention to himself. After about a five second huddle (which, one would hope, involved the referee using the phrase "Go screw yourself"), the flag was waved off.
A second example, from an ESPN game--I can't remember who was playing. The receiver caught the ball and was being pursued. When he got to the goal line, he dove in. He didn't do a backflip, he didn't dive in sideways, he dove at the goal line the way players do. Flag--excessive celebration, drawing attention to yourself, fifteen yards. Next year, the touchdown would have been disallowed. There were two defenders pursuing, both within five yards of him. Could they have caught him? No, but how was he supposed to know exactly where they were? Should he have turned around and run in backwards? That would have gotten a flag. Is the NCAA going to bring in extra officials to hold up signs when players need to/are allowed to dive for the pylon, or should the players go just assume that if they're inside the ten, defenders will stop and let them score?
3. Timing--Let's say that a player does do a flip as a he crosses the goal line. Are the officials going to go to the replay to determine whether or not the ball had crossed the goal line before he started the flip? If one takes a TD off the board and the other is a 15 yard penalty, forget "Well, he shouldn't have done it in the first place"--they'd better make sure to get it right.
It's a stupid rule aimed at fixing something that isn't that much of a problem that is already addressed by the rule. Ask Washington a few years ago how much 15 yards on an extra point matters. Ask Kansas State this year. Ask any coach who loses it on the sideline when his team has to kick off from the 15 after a touchdown. It's a bad rule aimed at addressing a non-existent epidemic of touchdown celebrations. If they want to address the issue, then start calling more penalties on players celebrating first downs, sacks, or slightly better-than-average plays.
Dennis