@bodogjoe said:They way things are progressing with Mccoy. I dont see how you can pull him for Jake Delhomme. Delhomme was obviously a bandaid till we could fiind a more permanent solution. Colt is possibly that solution, and thus far he has been doing pretty well considering whats hes been faced with. On top of that, you would throw a wrench into the current momentum they have. Doesnt make any sense on any level. His best contribution atm is to pass his wisdom of the game to Colt. Will he want to accept that role? I doubt it. But thats what is best for the team atm. Wallace is a free agent and Dellhomme is under contract for a hefty chunk of change that you'd have to eat! I agree Wallace would be a better back up and I'd eat Jakes contract and offer Wallace a new 3 year deal as a backup.

@mopaji said:And you feel awesome afterwards. Details? I wanna feel "awesome".

I smell upset! Go Browns! Take a look at 1989 stats, Ill be back...

@calfoxwc said:IMO: First you need a WR who is brave enough to come across the middle, MoMass, & Robiskie dont have large enough onions to perform that task. And they need to protect Cribbs, he takes enough shots on special teams. T ****************************** Oh, come on. I can't imagine MoMass and Robo saying "farc you, coach, I'm not going over the middle on a slant. That's bs," I'm looking for some short, quick patterns over the middle before int's happen on the many flare outs to the sidelines... I have NO idea what's going on with Robiskie, but I like Moore...a LOT! I also think Stuckey's starting to show something & calfoxwc & I agree on the quick slant patterns. Those short sideline patterns have ALWAYS scared the hell out of me...Miss that throw a little bit or timing a little off & it's 6 points the other way. Mike